Abstract
Early on in its development, you ought to get your argument reviewed by someone else; preferably your Customer, if you have one. This chapter introduces additional notation that you can use to let your reviewers know where in your Goal Structure there is more to be done. These additions include the Goal to be Developed symbol, which is also known as Undeveloped Goal. Some people like to add explanatory notes to their Goal Structures; this chapter also suggests some symbols for this, but note that they are not part of the formal notation and they can clutter your diagrams. Finally, I start development of a checklist that may be used by the reviewer of arguments presented in GSN; the author of such arguments should always use it…
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReference
Kelly TP (2007) Reviewing assurance arguments—a step-by-step approach. In: Proceedings of a workshop on assurance cases for security—the metrics challenge, Dependable Systems and Networks, July 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Spriggs, J. (2012). The Argument is Ready for Review…. In: GSN - The Goal Structuring Notation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2312-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2312-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2311-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2312-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)