Dermatoethics pp 233-236 | Cite as

Telling the Same Tale Twice: Déjà vu and the Shades of Grey in Self-Plagiarism

  • Andrea L. Suárez
  • Jeffrey D. Bernhard
  • Robert P. Dellavalle
Chapter

Abstract

The integrity of medical and scientific publishing depends on responsible and honest practices by authors. Some of the practices that threaten the integrity of scientific publication include publishing the same paper in more than one journal (i.e. duplicate publication), presenting data from one study in multiple small papers (i.e. salami-slicing), copyright infringement, and text recycling [1]. While this subject is of vital interest to authors and investigators, as well as to journal editors and reviewers, it is also relevant to the readership of these publications. This chapter will explore and analyze examples of these practices.

Keywords

Placebo Keratosis Salami 

References

  1. 1.
    von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramer MR. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA. 2004;291(8):974–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martin JBD, Cheng D. Duplicate publication in meta-analysis of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass. CC Testing Journal 2004. http://www.imbi.uni-freiburg.de/OJS/cca/index.php/cca/article/view/2584. Accessed 8 Nov 2011.
  3. 3.
    Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):635–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Couzin-Frankel J, Grom J. Scientific publishing. Plagiarism sleuths. Science. 2009;324(5930):1004–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. ICMJE website. 2008. www.icmje.org. Accessed 25 Nov 2011.
  6. 6.
    Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D, et al. Research methods & reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ. 2009;339:b4330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kassirer JP, Angell M. Redundant publication: a reminder. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(7):449–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, et al. American Medical Association manual of style. A guide for authors and editors. 9th ed. Batimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roig M. Re-using text from one’s own previously published papers: an exploratory study of potential self-plagiarism. Psychol Rep. 2005;97(1):43–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roig EP. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing. 2009;http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/plagiarism/index.shtml. Accessed 10 July 2010.
  11. 11.
    Norman I, Griffiths P. Duplicate publication and ‘salami slicing’: ethical issues and practical solutions. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(9):1257–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott-Lichter D. Council of science editors white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications, 2009 Update. 2009; 77. Available at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/whitepaper/entire_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2010.
  13. 13.
    Samuelson P. Self-plagiarism or fair use? Institute of Computing Machinery. Commun ACM. 1994;37:21–5.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scanlon P. Song from myself: an anatomy of self-plagiarism. Plagiary. 2007;2(17):1–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boisvert R, Irwin M. Plagiarism on the rise. Association of Computing Machinery. Commun ACM. 2006;49:23–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Office of Research Integrity. Policy on plagiarism: US Department of Health and Human Services; Dec 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szklo M, Wilcox A. On the failure to disclose sibling manuscripts. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(4):281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Langdon-Neuner E. When does previous disclosure become a ‘prior publication’ problem? Chest. 2009;135(1):233–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    BioMed Central. Guidance on duplicate publication for BioMed Central journal editors. http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/duplicatepublication. Accessed 6 Mar 2010.
  20. 20.
    Dellavalle RP, Banks MA, Ellis JI. Frequently asked questions regarding self-plagiarism: how to avoid recycling fraud. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(3):527.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dobson RL. Dual publication and manipulation of the editorial process. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(6 Pt 1):1181–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Loadsman JA, Garner HR, Drummond GB. Towards the elimination of duplication in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(5):643–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Errami M, Wren JD, Hicks JM, Garner HR. eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(Web Server issue):W12–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Errami M, Hicks JM, Fisher W, et al. Deja vu–a study of duplicate citations in Medline. Bioinformatics. 2008;24(2):243–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Errami M, Sun Z, Long TC, George AC, Garner HR. Deja vu: a database of highly similar citations in the scientific literature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D921–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea L. Suárez
    • 1
  • Jeffrey D. Bernhard
    • 2
  • Robert P. Dellavalle
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Dermatology, Denver VA Medical Center, School of MedicineUniversity of Colorado DenverAuroraUSA
  2. 2.University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of EpidemiologyColorado School of Public HealthAuroraUSA
  4. 4.Department of Veterans Affairs, Dermatology ServiceEastern Colorado Health Care SystemDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations