Casual Social Games as Serious Games: The Psychology of Gamification in Undergraduate Education and Employee Training

  • Richard N. LandersEmail author
  • Rachel C. Callan


Gameification (or, gamification) is becoming an increasingly popular technique to motivate learners, yet little theory or empirical evidence is available to support its use. In the present chapter, instructional design in relation to games and gameification is explored, including discussion of the psychological determinants of learning. The extant research literatures surrounding online social media, learning-by-testing, and goal-setting theory are then integrated in order to provide a scientific rationale for gameification. The resulting integrative theory of gameification in learning suggests that students may learn more by completing tests than they do when studying, that students can be motivated to complete such tests by offering them social rewards in the form of carefully designed virtual badges, and that these badges should be offered in an online social context which students find meaningful in order to motivate them to action. To examine this integrative theory, an online social network with gameification elements was created and deployed in a Psychology department at a major east coast university in order to motivate students to complete optional online multiple choice quizzes. The system was highly successful; 29% of participants opted to complete gameified optional multiple choice quizzes and on average reported those quizzes as fun, enjoyable, and rewarding. This proof-of-concept study is discussed in terms of its implications for both undergraduate education and employee training, including a list of current “best practices” regarding social game implementation.


Social Network Site Performance Goal Online Social Network Observable Skill Social Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We offer special thanks to the Old Dominion University Research Foundation for funding a Summer Research Fellowship to support this project.


  1. Anastasi, A.: Coaching, test sophistication and developed abilities. Am. Psychol. 36, 1086–1093 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AppData: Top applications leaderboard Facebook application metrics. (2011). Accessed 15 Feb 2011
  3. Axellson, A.-S., Regan, T.: Playing online. In: Vorderer, P., Bryant, J. (eds.) Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, pp. 291–306. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway, NJ (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd, D.M., Ellison, N.B.: Social networking sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 13, 210–230 (2008). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, J.P.: Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Dunnette, M.D., Hough, L.M. (eds.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1, 2nd edn., pp. 687–732. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA (1990)Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J.P., Kuncel, N.R.: Individual and team training. In: Anderson, N., Ones, D.S., Sinangil, H.K., Viswesvaran, C. (eds.) Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Personnel Psychology, pp. 278–312. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Clark, T.: Attitudes of American higher education faculty toward distance education: A national survey. Am. J. Distance Educ. 7(2), 19–33 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dillon, C.L., Walsh, S.M.: Faculty: The neglected resource in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 6(3), 5–21 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput. Mediated Commun. 12, 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  13. Gemmill, E., Peterson, M.: Technology use among college students: Implications for student affairs professionals. NASPA J. 43, 280–300 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, S.G., Harris, M.L., Colaric, S.M.: Technology acceptance in an academic context: Faculty acceptance of online education. J. Educ. Bus. 83, 355–359 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gomes, B.G., Arranz, A.G., Cillan, J.G.: The role of loyalty programs in behavioral and affective loyalty. J. Consumer Market. 23, 387–396 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greitemeyer, T., Osswald, S., Brauer, M.: Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude. Emotion 10, 796–802 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Carter, S.M., Lehto, A.T., Elliot, A.J.: Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. J. Per. Soc. Psychol. 73, 1284–1295 (1997). doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hung, H.-T., Yuen, S.C.-Y.: Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teach. Higher Educ. 15, 703–714 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, S.: Let the games begin: Gaming technology and entertainment among college students. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. (2003). Accessed 31 Dec 2010
  20. Kim, B.-D., Shi, M., Srinivasan, K.: Reward programs and tacit collusion. Market. Sci. 20, 99–120 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kraiger, K.: Perspectives on training and development. In: Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., Klimoski, R.J. (eds.) Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2003)Google Scholar
  22. Lepper, M.R., Malone, T.W.: Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, Vol. 3, pp. 107–141. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (1987)Google Scholar
  23. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 705–717 (2002). doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: New directions in goal-setting theory. Curr Dir. Psychol. Sci. 15, 265–268 (2006). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maslow, A.H.: The Psychology of Science: A Reconnaissance. Harper & Row, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  26. Olson, C.: Children’s motivations for video game play in the context of normal development. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14, 180–187 (2010). doi: 10.1037/a0018984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ordóñez, L.D., Schweitzer, M.E., Galinsky, A.D., Bazerman, M.H.: Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Acad. Manage. Perspect. 23, 6–16 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orvis, K.A., Horn, D.B., Belanich, J.: An examination of the role individual differences play in videogame-based training. Mil. Psychol. 21, 461–481 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A., Calvert, S.L.: College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 30, 227–238 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodrigo, M.: Dynamics of student cognitive-affective transitions during a mathematics game. Simul. Gaming 42, 85–99 (2010). doi: 10.1177/1046878110361513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roediger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D.: Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci. 17, 249–255 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rogers, B.: TOEFL CBT Success. Peterson’s, Princeton, NJ (2001)Google Scholar
  33. Seijts, G.H., Latham, G.P.: The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. J. Organ. Behav. 22, 291–307 (2001). doi: 10.1002/job.70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spielberger, C.D.: Theory and research on anxiety. In: Spieldberger, C.D. (ed.) Anxiety and Behavior, pp. 3–20 Academic, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  35. Wakefield, J.: 2010, the year that privacy died? BBC News. (2010, December 31). Accessed 31 Dec 2010
  36. Westwood, D., Griffiths, M.D.: The role of structural characteristics in video-game play motivation: A Q-methodology study. Cyberpsychol Behav. Soc. Networking 13, 581–585 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, K.A., Bedwell, W.L., Lazzara, E.H., Salas, E., Burke, C.S., Estock, J.L., Orvis, K.L., Conkey, C.: Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simul. Gaming 40, 217–266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zynga, Inc.: About Zynga Inc. (2011). Accessed 1 Mar 2011

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations