Choosing a Serious Game for the Classroom:An Adoption Model for Educators

  • Kae NovakEmail author
  • Rurik Nackerud


Educators eager to integrate serious games into the curriculum, but who are not trained or funded for game development, must choose an off-the-shelf or online game. These educators face a special set of questions. Current instructional design models do not address how a educator should conduct formative evaluation prior to the integration of online serious games or off the shelf games that are not specifically designed for their course. A team comprised of educators developed and tested an approach on evaluation and implementation of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) video games. The RCIPR model consists of five components for initial adoption of a game. This adoption model for evaluating COTS harnesses the power of player and instructor evaluation to achieve a comprehensive grasp of the deep learning made possible by playing a well-chosen video game. Additionally it emphasizes researching the game, working with IT personnel, piloting the game and documentation.


Video Game Learning Objective Instructional Designer Virtual World Early Adopter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

List of Acronyms


Commercial-off-the-shelf games


Digital gamed based learning


Entertainment Software Rating Board


Information technology


Learning management system


Massively Multi-player Online Role-Playing Game


World of Warcraft

Model Specific Acronyms


Cause You To Ignore Everything


Research, choose, investigate, pilot and reflect


  1. Akilli, G.K., Cagiltay, K.: An instructional design/development model for the creation of game like learning environments: the FIDGE model. In: Pivec, M. (ed.) Affective and Emotional Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction Game-Based and Innovative Learning Approaches, Vol. 1, pp. 93–112. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A.: Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, J. Implementing technology initiatives: the impact of individual cognitive dissonance on success. In: Pearson, E., Bohman, P. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, pp. 1344–1349. AACE, Chesapeake, VA (2006)Google Scholar
  4. Blizzard Entertainment Inc.: World of Warcraft® subscriber base reaches 12 million worldwide. (2010)
  5. Csíkszentmihályi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  6. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S.: Third generation educational use of computer games. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 16(3), 263–281 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. Festinger, L.A.: Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1957)Google Scholar
  8. Gee, J.: What Video Games Have To Tell Us About Learning and Literacy. Palgrave, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Grushka, K., McLeod, J.H., Reynolds, R.: Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian University teacher education program. Reflective Pract. 6(2), 239–246 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huizinga, J.: Homo ludens. The Beacon Press, Boston, MA (1950)Google Scholar
  11. Jenkins, H., Puroshotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., Robinson, A.: Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. (2005). Accessed 20 Mar 2011
  12. Keller, J.M.: The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In: Shaw, K., Trott, A.J. (eds.) Aspects of Educational Technology Volume XVII: Staff Development and Career Updating, pp. 140–145. Kogan Page, London (1984)Google Scholar
  13. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  14. Luttenberg, J., Bergen, T.: Teacher reflection: the development of a typology. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 14(5–6), 543–566 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malone, T.W., Lepper, M.R.: Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow, R.E., Farr, M.J. (eds.) Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses, pp. 223–253. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1987)Google Scholar
  16. Moore, G.A.: Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling Disruptive Products to Mainstream Customers. First Collins Business Essentials Edition. Harper Collins Publishers, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  17. Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning, 1st edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  18. Rice, J.W.: New media resistance: Barriers to implementation of computer video games in the classroom. J. Educ. Multimedia Hypermedia 16(3), 249–261 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Squire, K., Jenkins, H.: Harnessing the power of games in education. InSight 3. (2003). Accessed 28 Dec 2008
  20. Van Eck, R.: Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. Educause Rev. 41(2), 16–30 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Front Range Community CollegeWestminsterUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Virtual AcademyNorth BendUSA

Personalised recommendations