Advertisement

Consent and Litigation in Thyroid Surgery

  • Barney HarrisonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Prior to agreeing to a recommendation for thyroid surgery, the patient should be made aware of the indications for operation and its implications, risks, and potential complications. When the outcome from surgery is not as planned, be reassured that litigation after thyroidectomy is uncommon, and if appropriate decision-making took place before, during, and after operation, it is unlikely to succeed.

Keywords

Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Thyroid Surgery Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy Expert Witness Laryngeal Nerve Palsy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abadin SS, Kaplan EL, Angelos P. Malpractice litigation after thyroid surgery: the role of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, 1989–2009. Surgery. 2010;148(4):718–22; discussion 22–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina PF, Rolfs T, Hommeltenberg S, Hinrichs J, Meier B, Mohmand W, et al. Intraoperative neuromonitoring does not reduce the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in thyroid reoperations: results of a retrospective comparative analysis. World J Surg. 2012;36(6):1348–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barczynski M, Konturek A, Cichon S. Randomized clinical trial of visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 2009;96(3):240–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lydiatt DD. Medical malpractice and the thyroid gland. Head Neck. 2003;25(6):429–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mello MM, Chandra A, Gawande AA, Studdert DM. National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(9):1569–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mihai R, Randolph G. Thyroid surgery, voice and the laryngeal examination—time for increased awareness and accurate evaluation. World J Endocr Surg. 2009;1:1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morris LG, Ziff DJ, Delacure MD. Malpractice litigation after surgical injury of the spinal accessory nerve: an evidence-based analysis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(1):102–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schulte KM, Roher HD. Medico-legal aspects of thyroid surgery. Chirurg. 1999;70(10):1131–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaw GY, Pierce E. Malpractice litigation involving iatrogenic surgical vocal fold paralysis: a closed-claims review with recommendations for prevention and management. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(1):6–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Singer MC, Iverson KC, Terris DJ. Thyroidectomy-related malpractice claims. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3):358–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wheeler R. The numeric threshold for the disclosure of risk: outdated and inapplicable to surgical consent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94(2):81–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Acting as an expert witness – Guidance for doctors. www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/expert_witness_guidance.asp.
  2. Sokol DK. How can I avoid being sued? BMJ. 2011;343:d7827.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Endocrine SurgeryRoyal Hallamshire HospitalSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations