Emerging Technological Risk

  • Stuart Anderson
  • Massimo Felici


Technology involves risk . But what is technology risk? The literature on risk is broad and involves a vast spectrum of disciplines. It is difficult even to draw a multidisciplinary account of risk . Although different risk accounts might initially seem to be controversial or contradicting each other, it is useful to draw similarities or relationships between them. This supports cross-fertilisation between scientific and practitioner communities, who share an interest in understanding risk in technology and its evolution , or technology innovation . The problem, on the one hand, is a communication one—different disciplines need to inform each other. On the other hand, it requires a shift from multidisciplinary accounts to an interdisciplinary understanding of technology risk . Our socio-technical studies highlight and discuss various research results that contribute towards an interdisciplinary account of emerging technological risk .


  1. 1.
    Anderson S, Felici M (2009) Classes of socio-technical hazards: microscopic and macroscopic scales of risk analysis. Risk Manag 11(34):208–240. doi: 10.1057/rm.2009.7 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Douglas M, Wildavsky A (1982) Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Felici M (2006) Capturing emerging complex interactions: safety analysis in air traffic management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(12):1482–1493. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.010
  5. 5.
    Le Coze J (2005) Are organisations too complex to be integrated in the technical risk assessment and current safety auditing? Saf Sci 43(8):613–638. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.06.005 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Coze J (2008) Disasters and organisations: from lessons learnt to theorising. Saf Sci 46(1):132–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.12.001 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacKenzie D (2001) Physics and finance: S-terms and modern finance as a topic for science studies. Sci Technol Hum Values 26(2):115–144. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600201
  8. 8.
    MacKenzie D (2003) An equation and its worlds: bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Soc Stud Sci 33(6):831–868. doi: 10.1177/0306312703336002 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacKenzie D (2003) Long-term capital management and the sociology of arbitrage. Econ Soc 32(3):349–380. doi: 10.1080/03085140303130 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MacKenzie D (2004) The big, bad wolf and the rational market: portfolio insurance, the 1987 crash and the performativity of economics. Econ Soc 33(3):303–334. doi: 10.1080/0308514042000225680
  11. 11.
    MacKenzie D (2004) Social connectivities in global financial markets. Environ Plan D Soc Space 22(1):83–101. doi: 10.1068/d317t
  12. 12.
    MacKenzie D, Millo Y (2003) Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. Am J Sociol 109(1):107–145. doi: 10.1086/374404 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neumann PG (1995) Computer related risks. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Informatics, The University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations