Abstract
Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of urinary incontinence involves the recording of urethrocystometry, sphincter EMG, urethral closure pressure profiles and voiding pressure studies. Integrating these tests and performing them at various states of bladder fullness as well as in different positions can allow the urodynamicist to obtain a great deal of useful information. However, this testing is costly and time consuming. Therefore, it is not appropriate for every patient who suffers from lower urinary tract dysfunction to undergo multichannel urodynamics. Various laboratories across the country have their exact criteria for who needs urodynamics and who does not. It is safe to say that most researchers would enjoy the opportunity to study all their patients if possible. Where to draw the line between who undergoes multichannel studies and who undergoes single channel standing cystometry, stress testing and other simple clinical tests is difficult. The performance of EMG testing with voiding pressure studies is essential in the patient who has urinary retention. However, it also provides useful information in those patients about to undergo incontinence surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Farrar DJ, Whiteside CG, Osborne JL et al: A urodynamic analysis of micturition symptoms in the female. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141: 875, 1975.
Hastie KJ, Masey CU: Are urodynamics necessary in female patients presenting with stress incontinence? Br J Urol 63: 155, 1989.
Le Coutour X, Jung-Faerber S, Klein P et al: Female urinary incontinence: comparative value of history and urodynamic investigations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 37: 279, 1990.
Sand PK, Bowen LW, Ostergard DR et al: The effect of retropubic urethropexy on detrusor stability. Obstet Gynecol 71: 818, 1988.
Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR: Supine urethroscopic and standing cystometry as screening methods for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 70: 57, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sand, P.K., Ostergard, D.R. (1995). Who Needs Urodynamics?. In: Urodynamics and the Evaluation of Female Incontinence. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2109-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2109-1_14
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19904-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2109-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive