Skip to main content

Abstract

Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of urinary incontinence involves the recording of urethrocystometry, sphincter EMG, urethral closure pressure profiles and voiding pressure studies. Integrating these tests and performing them at various states of bladder fullness as well as in different positions can allow the urodynamicist to obtain a great deal of useful information. However, this testing is costly and time consuming. Therefore, it is not appropriate for every patient who suffers from lower urinary tract dysfunction to undergo multichannel urodynamics. Various laboratories across the country have their exact criteria for who needs urodynamics and who does not. It is safe to say that most researchers would enjoy the opportunity to study all their patients if possible. Where to draw the line between who undergoes multichannel studies and who undergoes single channel standing cystometry, stress testing and other simple clinical tests is difficult. The performance of EMG testing with voiding pressure studies is essential in the patient who has urinary retention. However, it also provides useful information in those patients about to undergo incontinence surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Farrar DJ, Whiteside CG, Osborne JL et al: A urodynamic analysis of micturition symptoms in the female. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141: 875, 1975.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie KJ, Masey CU: Are urodynamics necessary in female patients presenting with stress incontinence? Br J Urol 63: 155, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Coutour X, Jung-Faerber S, Klein P et al: Female urinary incontinence: comparative value of history and urodynamic investigations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 37: 279, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sand PK, Bowen LW, Ostergard DR et al: The effect of retropubic urethropexy on detrusor stability. Obstet Gynecol 71: 818, 1988.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sand PK, Hill RC, Ostergard DR: Supine urethroscopic and standing cystometry as screening methods for the detection of detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 70: 57, 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sand, P.K., Ostergard, D.R. (1995). Who Needs Urodynamics?. In: Urodynamics and the Evaluation of Female Incontinence. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2109-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2109-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19904-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-2109-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics