Abstract
There are several options when dealing with bone deficiency in total knee reconstructions. Cement used by itself is inadequate for structural weight-bearing defects that are more than 1cm in depth. Cement, reinforced by screws, can be used to fill small defects in elderly patients. There is a definite place for wedges and revision components. Small contained defects can be filled with morsellised autograft or allograft bone, but for major bone loss I prefer structural weight-bearing bone grafts. The advantages of such grafts are that the bone architecture can be re-established and provides more bone stock for subsequent revisions, if these are necessary. If cement is used, the interface between the components and the graft is inert, at least initially.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Further Reading
Basset CAL, Becker RO (1962) Generation of electrical potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science 137:1063
Springfield DS (1987) Massive autogenous bone grafts. Orthop Clin North Am 18 (4):249–256
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandler, H.P. (1992). Structural Bone Grafting Technique in Total Knee Replacement Surgery. In: Older, M.W.J. (eds) Bone Implant Grafting. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1934-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1934-0_23
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1936-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1934-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive