Abstract
Our experience with revision arthroplasty of the knee is more limited than with the hip because there is a 4:1 ratio of total hip to knee total joint replacements in North America. Loss of bone stock is the main problem with knee revision surgery although less than that associated with the hip. The options for salvage are to use more cement, a custom prosthesis or autograft. An arthrodesis is difficult at the best of times and generally unacceptable in North America today. Excision arthroplasty is not as good in the knee as the hip although, like an amputation, it is an option. Reconstruction with cement is weak and may lead to more rapid bone loss. Metal wedges are probably too small for most revisions so we tend to use bone grafts which give better load transfer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gross, A.E. (1992). Allografts in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Older, M.W.J. (eds) Bone Implant Grafting. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1934-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1934-0_20
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1936-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1934-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive