Skip to main content

Invariants of a Pair of Conics Revisited

  • Conference paper
Book cover BMVC91

Abstract

The invariants of a pair of quadratic forms and a pair of coplanar conics are revisited following [1, 5, 2]. For a given pair of conies, with their associated matrices C1 and C2, we show that Trace (C-12C1), Trace (C-11C2) and ∣C1∣/∣C1∣ are only invariants of associated quadratic forms, but not invariants of the conies. Two of true invariants of the conies are \(\frac{{Trace(C_2^{ - 1} C_1 )}}{{(Trace(C_2^{ - 1} C_1 ))^2 }}\frac{{\left| {C_2 } \right|}}{{\left| {C_1 } \right|}}and\frac{{Trace(C_2^{ - 1} C_1 )}}{{(Trace(C_2^{ - 1} C_1 ))^2 }}\frac{{\left| {C_1 } \right|}}{{\left| {C_2 } \right|}}\). Then the true invariants of the conies are geometrically interpreted, in terms of cross ratios, through the common self-polar triangle of the two conies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Forsyth, J. Mundy, and A. Zisserman. Transformationnal Invariance — a primer. In British Machine Vision Conference, pages 1-6, Sept. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Forsyth, J. L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, and C. Rothwell. Invariant Descriptors for 3D Object Recognition and Pose. In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, pages 171 — 208, Reykjavik — Iceland, 25–28 March 1991. DARPA — ESPRIT Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Kapur and J. L. Mundy. Fitting Affine Invariant Conics to Curves. In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, pages 209–233, Reykjavik — Iceland, 25–28 March 1991. DARPA — ESPRIT Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S.J. Maybank. The projection of two non-coplanar conics. In Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, pages pages 47–53, Reykjavik — Iceland, 25–28 March 1991. DARPA — EEC Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.G. Semple and G.T. Kneebone. Algebraic Projective Geometry. Oxford Science Publication, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Zisserman, C. Marinos, D.A. Forsyth, J.L. Mundy, and C.A. Rothwell. Relative Motion and Pose from Invariants. In British Machine Vision Conference, pages 7-12, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quan, L., Gros, P., Mohr, R. (1991). Invariants of a Pair of Conics Revisited. In: Mowforth, P. (eds) BMVC91. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1921-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1921-0_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19715-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1921-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics