Skip to main content

Clinical Research and the Consumer

  • Chapter
Ethics in Reproductive Medicine
  • 71 Accesses

Abstract

In the introduction to a paper prepared for the February 1988 meeting of the WHO European Advisory committee for Health Research, the sociologist Margaret Stacey wrote:

All areas associated with reproduction are of profound importance for individuals and for society at large; they are not, and cannot be, conceived as merely clinical matters. Reproductive techniques affect the health of individuals beyond the immediate event of birth and also influence, as well as reflect, the basic values of societies. Reproduction is about the future of the society; the way it is handled will inevitably affect that future biologically and socially.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Botting B, Macfarlane A, Price F (1990) Three, four and more: a study of triplet and higher order births. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers I (1989) Evaluating the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC (eds) Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorowitz S (1990) Informed consent. In: Bromham D, Dalton M, Jackson J (eds) Philosophical ethics in reproductive medicine. Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York, pp 228–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer J (1991) The wider implications of new reproductive technologies. Royal Society of Medicine Forum on Maternity and the Newborn, February 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (1991) Code of practice: consultation document. Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Interim Licensing Authority for Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryology (1990) Fifth report. ILA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilford R (1990) What is informed consent? In: Bromham D, Dalton M, Jackson J (eds) Philosophical ethics in reproductive medicine. Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims P, Cameron N (1989) New medicine for old - the demise of the Hippocratic tradition. In: Bromham D, Forsythe E, Dalton M (eds) Ethical problems in reproductive medicine. National Association of Family Planning Doctors, London, pp 34–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey M (1988) The manipulation of the birth process: research implications. Meeting of the WHO European Advisory Committee for Health Research, February 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing Joint Committee of the British Paediatric Association and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1991) A checklist of questions to ask when evaluating proposed research during pregnancy and following birth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Somorjay, L. (1992). Clinical Research and the Consumer. In: Bromham, D.R., Dalton, M.E., Jackson, J.C., Millican, P.J.R. (eds) Ethics in Reproductive Medicine. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1895-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1895-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1897-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1895-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics