Innovations and Future Possibilities
The standard of care and the quality of life for patients with spinal cord injuries have improved enormously in the last 40–50 years, and along with these has come a very significant reduction in mortality.
KeywordsSpinal Cord Injury Spinal Cord Injury Patient Posterior Root Autonomic Dysreflexia Pelvic Plexus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arnold EP, Gowland SP, MacFarlane MR, Bean AR, Utley WLF (1986) Sacral anterior root stimulation of the bladder in paraplegics. Br J Urol 58: 319–324Google Scholar
- Arnold EP, Anthony A, Henderson S, Schousboe M (1989) Intermittent self catheterisation and a catheter storage tube: a review of experience in a neuropathic bladder. In: Proceedings of the Urological Society of Australasia, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Bielby JA, Keogh EJ (1989) Spinal cord injuries and anejaculation. Paraplegia 27: 152Google Scholar
- Bors E (1954) Bladder disturbances in the management of patients with injury to the spinal cord. J Int Coll Surg Bulletin 21: 513Google Scholar
- Bors E, Comarr AE (1960) Neurological disturbances of sexual function with special reference to 529 patients with spinal cord injuries. Urol Surv 10: 191–222Google Scholar
- Brindley GS (1973) Emptying the bladder by stimulating sacral ventral roots. J Physiol 237: 15–16Google Scholar
- Brindley GS (1984a) Electrical stimulation in vesico-urethral dysfunction. In: Mundy AR, Stephenson TP, Wein AJ (eds) Urodynamics: principles, practice and applications. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 381–388Google Scholar
- Chaffee EL, Light RU (1934) Radiofrequency link to stimulate the monkey brain. Yale Biol Med 7: 83–128Google Scholar
- Fall M, Erlandson BE, Nilson EA, Sundin T (1978) Longterm intravaginal electrical stimulation in urge and stress incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol [Suppl] 44: 55–60Google Scholar
- Marman JL, DeBenedictus TJ, Praiss DE (1984) Clinical experience with an artificial spermatocele. Andrology 5: 304–311Google Scholar
- Rossier AB, Fam BA (1983) Indications and results of semirigid penile prostheses in spinal cord injury patients: long-term follow up. J Urol 131: 59–62Google Scholar