Abstract
As the range of prenatal tests becomes wider due to technological advances, and the number of women offered tests increases, so does the need for appropriate counselling provision. The ascertainment and counselling of those at high risk, as well as counselling of all pregnant women offered prenatal screening tests, must be addressed. Care for couples undergoing prenatal diagnosis hinges on communication and much of this, especially for those at relatively high risk, may be provided through the process of genetic counselling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ad Hoc Committee on Genetic Counselling. Genetic counselling. Am J Hum Genet 1975; 27:240–2.
A Report of the Royal College of Physicians. Prenatal diagnosis and genetic screening. Community and service implications. The Royal College of Physicians of London, 1989.
Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Niermeijer MF, van de Berge SMM, Galjaard H. Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counselling. Am J Med Genet 1990; 35:496–502.
Read AP, Kerzin-Storrar L, Mountford RC, Elles RG, Harris R. A register based system for gene tracking in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Med Genet 1986; 23:581–6.
Evers-Kiebooms G, Denayer L, van den Berghe H. A child with cystic fibrosis: II. Subsequent family planning decisions, reproduction and use of prenatal diagnosis. Clin Genet 1990; 37:207–15.
Sjogren B, Uddenberg N. Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1988; 8:263–73.
Phipps S, Zinn AB. Psychological response to amniocentesis: I. Mood state and adaptation to pregnancy. Am J Med Genet 1986; 25:131–42.
Drugan A, Greb A, Johnson MP et al. Determinants of parental decisions to abort for chromosome abnormalities. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:483–90.
Clayton-Smith J, Andrews T, Donnai D. Genetic counselling and parental decision following antenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies. J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 10:5–7.
Leonard MF, Sparrow S. Prospective study of development of children with sex chromosome anomalies: New Haven Newborn Study IV. Adolescence. Birth Defects 1986; 22:221–49.
Ratcliffe SG, Murray L, Teague P. Edinburgh study of growth and development of children with sex chromosome abnormalities III. Birth Defects 1986; 22:73–118.
Connor JM. Prenatal diagnosis of the Turner’s syndrome: what to tell the parents. Brit. Med J. 1986; 293:711–12.
Warburton D. Outcome of cases of de novo structural rearrangements diagnosed at amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4:69–70.
Donnai D. The clinical significance of de novo structural rearrangements and markers detected prenatally by amniocentesis. J Med Genet 1989; 26:545.
Chorionic Villi Working Party Report. Chorionic Villi 1987 and 1989. Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists, 1988.
Stiovi S, De Silvestris M, Molinari A, Stripparo L, Ghisoni L, Simoni G. Trisomic 22 placenta in the case of severe intrauterine growth retardation. Prenat Diagn 1989; 9:673–80.
Kalousek DK, Barrett IJ, McGillivray BC. Placental mosaicism and intrauterine survival of trisomies 13 and 18. Am J Hum Genet 1989; 44:338–43.
Clayton-Smith J, Farndon PA, McKeown C, Donnai D. Examination of fetuses after induced abortion for fetal abnormality. Br Med J 1990; 300:295–7.
Becker J, Glinski L, Laxova R. Long-term emotional impact of 2nd trimester pregnancy termination after detection of fetal abnormality. Am J Hum Genet 1984; 36:122.
White-van Mourik MCA, Connor JM, Ferguson-Smith MA. Patient care before and after termination of pregnancy for neural tube defect. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10:497–505.
Donnai P, Charles N, Harris R. Attitudes of patients after ‘genetic’ termination of pregnancy. Br Med J 1981; 282:621–2.
Lloyd J, Laurence KM. Sequelae and support after termination of pregnancy for fetal malformation. Br Med J 1985; 290:907–9.
Pauker SP, Pauker SG. The amniocentesis decision: ten years of decision analytic experience. Birth Defects 1987; 23:151–69.
Thornton JG. Decison analysis in prenatal diagnosis: measuring patient values. In: Lilford R, ed. Diagnosis and prognosis. London: Butterworths, 1990.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donnai, D., Kerzin-Storrar, L. (1991). Counselling After Prenatal Diagnosis. In: Drife, J.O., Donnai, D. (eds) Antenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Abnormalities. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1854-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1854-1_19
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1856-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1854-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive