Skip to main content
Book cover

CKBS ’90 pp 311–325Cite as

Object Recognition and Retrieval in the BACK System

  • Conference paper
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

The development of information management techniques is an important task in building future intelligent systems. In this context we describe the integration of the terminological knowledge representation system BACK with a relational database management system. High-level schemata definition and access to the knowledge base are provided by BACK, while persistency is obtained by the database management system. Query processing is delegated to the RDBMS by compiling knowledge base queries into a single (or few) complex SQL query. The run-time compiler is based on a semantic indexing technique provided by the terminological representation system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Borgida, R.J. Brachman, D.L. McGuinness, and L. Alperin Resnick. CLASSIC: A Structural Data Model for Objects. In Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIG MOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 59–67, Portland, Oreg., June 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Bergamaschi, F. Bonfatti, C. Sartori, and P. Tiberio. Relational Data Base Design for the Intensional Aspects of a Knowledge Base. Information Systems, 13 (3): 245–256, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H.W. Beck, S.K. Gala, and S.B. Navathe. Classification as a Query Processing Technique in the CANDIDE Semantic Data Model. In Proceedings of the International Data Engineering Conference, IEEE, pp. 572–581, Los Angeles, Cal., February 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Bertino and P. Randi. Task 5.4.2: Mapping AQL into SQL Programs Deliverable 2 Amendment Phase ESPRIT Project 311, May 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.L. Brodie. Future Intelligent Information Systems: AI and Database Technologies Working Together. In M.L. Brodie and J. Mylopoulos, editors, Readings in Artificial Intelligence and Databases. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Cal., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.J. Brachman and J.G. Schmolze. An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System. Cognitive Science, 9 (2): 171–216, April 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. W.W. Chu, Q. Chen, and R.-C. Lee. Cooperative Query Answering via Type Abstraction Hierarchy. In this book.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Chakravarthy, S.B. Navathe, K. Karlapalem, and A. Tanaka. Meeting the Cooperative Problem Solving Challenge: A Database-Oriented Approach. In this book.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Hull and R. King. Semantic Database Modelling: Survey, Applications and Research Issues. ACM Computing Surveys, 19 (3), 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Hollunder. Hybrid Inferences in KL-ONE-based Knowledge Representation Systems. In H. Marburger, editor, G WA I-90. 14th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 38–47, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Kindermann. Class Instances in a Terminological Framework — An Experience Report. In H. Marburger, editor, GWAI-90. 14th German Workshop on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 48–57, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. D.P. McKay, T.W. Finin, and A. O’Hare. The Intelligent Database Interface: Integrating AI and Database Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 677–684, Boston, Mass., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Nixon, K.L. Chung, D. Lauzon, A. Borgida, J. Mylopoulos, and M. Stanley. Design of a Compiler for a Semantic Data Model. In J.W. Schmidt and C. Thanos, editors, Foundations of Knowledge Base Management, pp. 293–343. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Nebel. Computational Complexity of Terminological Reasoning in BACK. Artificial Intelligence, 34 (3): 371–383, April 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Nebel and C. Peltason. Terminological Reasoning and Information Systems. In D. Karagiannis, editor, Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems: Aspects of an Integration, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Peltason, A. Schmiedel, C. Kindermann, and J. Quantz. The BACK System Revisited. KIT Report 75, Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.F. Patel-Schneider, et al. Term Subsumption Languages in Knowledge Representation. The AI Magazine, 11 (2): 16–23, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Quantz and C. Kindermann. Implementation of the BACK System Version 4. KIT Report 78, Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Berlin, December 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kindermann, C., Randi, P. (1991). Object Recognition and Retrieval in the BACK System. In: Deen, S.M. (eds) CKBS ’90. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1831-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1831-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19649-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1831-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics