Advertisement

Risks of Dietary Exposure to Pesticides in Infants and Children

  • D. Krewski
  • J. Wargo
  • R. Rizek
Part of the ILSI Monographs book series (ILSI MONOGRAPHS)

Abstract

Each year in the United States, approximately 2.7 billion pounds of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides, nematicides, and other chemicals are used to control a variety of living organisms collectively named “pests” [1]. Nearly 600 active chemical ingredients are combined with 1200 inert ingredients in various formulations to produce approximately 50 000 different pesticide products.

Keywords

Food Frequency Questionnaire Pesticide Residue Dietary Exposure Acceptable Daily Intake Risk Assessment Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    US Environmental Protection Agency (1988) Pesticide industry sales and usage: 1987 market estimates. Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    US Code of Federal Regulations (1989) Title 21, Part 193; Title 40, Part 180. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dwyer JT (1988) Assessment of dietary intake. In: Shuls ME, Young VR (eds). Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, 7th edn, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 887–905Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Research Council (1989) Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    US Department of Agriculture (1972) Food and nutrient intake of individuals in the United States, spring 1965. Household Food Consumption Survey 1965–66, Rep. No. 11, US Department of Agriculture, Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    US Department of Health and Human Services (1983) Dietary intake source data: United States, 1976-80. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 83 - 1681, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tillotson JL, Gorder DD, Kassim N (1981) Nutrition data collection in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. J Am Diet Assoc 78: 235–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frank GC, Voors AW, Schilling PE, Berenson GS (1977) Dietary studies of rural school children in a cardiovascular survey. J Am Diet Assoc 71: 31–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    US Department of Agriculture (1987) Continuing survey of food intakes by individuals: women 19–50 years and their children 1-5 years, 4 days, 1985. NFCS, CSFII Rep. No. 85 - 4, US Department of Agriculture, Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sampson L (1985) Food frequency questionnaire as a research instrument. Clin Nutr 4: 171–178Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Freudenheim JL, Johnson NE, Wardrop RL (1987) Misclassification of nutrient intake of individuals and groups using one-, two-, three-, and seven-day food records. Am J Epidemiol 126: 703–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantified food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122: 51–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chu SY, Kolonel LN, Hankin JH, Lee J (1984) A comparison of frequency and quantitative dietary methods for epidemiologic studies of diet and disease. Am J Epidemiol 119: 323–334PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Basiotis PP, Welsh SO, Cronin FJ, Kensay JL, Mertz W (1987) Number of days of food intake records required to estimate individual and group nutrient intakes with defined confidence. J Nutr 117: 1638–1641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marr JW, Heady JA (1986) Within- and between-person variation in dietary surveys: number of days needed to classify individuals. Hum Nutr Appl Nutr 40A: 347–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wargo J (1987) Analytical methodology for estimating oncongenic risks for human exposure to agricultural chemicals in food crops. In: Regulating pesticides in food: the Delaney paradox. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 174–195Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidt RD (1989) Guidelines for predicting dietary intakes of pesticide residues. Prepared with the Joint UNEP/FAO/WHO Food Contamination Monitoring Program in collaboration with the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gunderson EL (1988) FDA total diet study, April. 1982-April 1984, dietary intakes of pesticides, selected elements, and other chemicals. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 71: 1200–1209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    US Food and Drug Administration (1988) Food and Drug Administration pesticide program: residues in foods-1987. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 71: 156A–174AGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Archibald SO, Winter CK (1989) Pesticide residues and cancer risks. Calif Agric 43: 6–9Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Office of Technology Assessment (1988) Pesticide Residues in Food: technologies for detection. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fan AM, Jackson RJ (1989) Pesticides and food safety. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 9: 158–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klaasen CD (1986) Principles of toxicology. In: Klaasen CD, Amdur MO, Doull J (eds) Macmillan, New York, pp 11–32Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aldridge WN (1986) The biological basis and measurement of thresholds. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 26: 39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lehman AJ, Fitzhugh OG (1954) 100-fold margin of safety. Assoc Food Drug Off USO Bull 18: 33–35Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    National Research Council (1970) Evaluating the safety of food chemicals. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Research Council (1977) Drinking water and health. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barnes DG, Dourson ML (1988) Reference dose (RfD): description and use in health assessments. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 8: 471–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Armitage P (1985) Multistage models of carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perpsect 63: 195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moolgavkar SH (1986) Carcinogenesis modeling from molecular biology to epidemiology. Ann Rev Public Health 7: 151–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moolgavkar SH (1986) Hormones and multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Surveys 5: 635–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rail DP, Hogan MD, Huff JE, Schwetz BA, Tenant RW (1987) Alternatives to using human experience in assessing health risks. Ann Rev Public Health 8: 355–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krewski D, Van Ryzin J (1981) Dose response models for quantal response toxicity data. In: Csorgo M, Dawson D, Rao JNK, Saleh E (eds) Statistics and related topics. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 201–231Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Krewski D, Murdoch D, Withey J (1989) Recent developments in carcinogenic risk assessment. Health Phys 57 (Suppl 1): 313–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lutz WK, Buss P, Baertsch A, Caviezel M (1990) Evaluation of DNA binding in vivo for low dose extrapolation in chemical carcinogenesis. In: Waters MD, Nesnow S, Lewtas J, Moore NM, Daniel FB (eds) Genetic toxicology of complex mixtures. Plenum, New York. In press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Office of Science and Technology Policy (1985) Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. Federal Register 50: 10372–10442Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    US Environmental Protection Agency (1986) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Federal Register 51: 33992–34003Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Crump KS (1984) An improved procedure for low-dose carcinogenic risk assessment from minimal data. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol 6: 339–348Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krewski D, Gaylor DW, Szyszkowicz MS (1990) A model-free approach to low dose extrapolation. Environ Health Perspectives.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Krewski D, Goddard MJ, Withey J (1990) Carcinogenic potency and interspecies extrapolation. In: Mendelsohn ML (ed) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference in Environmental Mutagents. Alan R Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Allen B, Crump KS, Shipp A (1988) Carcinogenic potency of chemicals in animals and humans. Risk Anal 8: 531–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Travis CC, Whyte RK (1988) Interspecific scaling of toxicity data. Risk Anal 8: 119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Research Council (1987) Regulating pesticides in foods: the Delaney paradox. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Natural Resources Defence Council (1989) Intolerable risk: pesticides in our children’s food. Natural Resources Defence Council, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    International Program on Chemical Safety (1986) Principles for evaluating health risks from chemicals during infancy and early childhood: The need for a special approach. Environmental Health Criteria 59, World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    McColl S (1989) Biological safety factors in toxicological risk assessment. Health and Welfare Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Babich H, Davis DL (1981) Food tolerances and action levels: do they adequately protect children? Bioscience 31: 429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gaines TB, Linder RE (1989) Acute toxicity of pesticides in adult and weanling rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 7: 299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    American Health Foundation (1989) Coronary artery disease prevention: cholesterol - a pediatric perspective. Prev Med 18: 323–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Peto R, Gray R, Brantom P, Grasso P (1986) Nitrosamine carcinogenesis in 5120 rodents: chronic administration of sixteen different concentrations of NDEA, NDMA, NPYR and NPIP in the water of 4440 inbred rats, with parallel studies on NDEA alone of the effect of age of starting (3, 6 or 20 weeks) and of species (rats, mice or hamsters). In: L’Neil IK, Von Borstel RC, Miller CT, Long J, Bartsch H (eds) N- Nitroso compounds: occurrence, biological effects and relevance to human cancer. IARC Scientific Publications No. 57, IARC, Lyon, pp 627–665Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Arnold DL, Krewski D, Munro IC (1983) Saccharin: a toxicological and historical perspective. Toxicology 27: 179–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Anonymous (1985) Saccharin: current status. Food Chem Toxicol 23: 417–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kodell RL, Gaylor DW, Chen JJ (1987) Using average lifetime dose rate for intermitten exposures to carcinogens. Risk Anal 7: 339–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen JJ, Kodell RL, Gaylor D (1988) Using the biological two-stage model to assess risk from short-term exposures. Risk Anal 8: 223–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Murdoch D, Krewski D (1988) Carcinogenic risk assessment with time-dependent exposure patterns. Risk Anal 8: 521–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Krewski
    • 1
  • J. Wargo
    • 2
  • R. Rizek
    • 3
  1. 1.Health Protection BranchHealth and Welfare CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Human Nutrition Information ServiceUS Department of AgricultureHyattsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations