Knee Biomechanics and Materials

  • Malcolm H. Pope
  • Braden C. Fleming

Abstract

“Biomechanics is the study of forces and the effects that these forces have on the human body” (LeVeau 1984). From the orthopaedist’s perspective, there is a normal equilibrium between mechanical stress on the musculoskeletal system and its response to that stress. Any disturbance to this balance will eventually result in remodeling, degeneration, or failure of a structure. Within the realm of total knee replacement, it is necessary to understand fully the biomechanics of the normal joint since the objective of total knee arthroplasty is to re-establish normal joint function.

Keywords

Fatigue Titanium Arthritis Polyethylene Brittle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andriacchi T (1988) Biomechanics and gait analysis in total knee replacement. Orthop Rev 17: 470–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriacchi T, Galante J, Fermier R (1982) The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 65: 1328–1335Google Scholar
  3. Balazs E, Gibbs D (1970) Chemistry and molecular biology of the intercellular matrix. Academic Press, New York, pp 1241–1253Google Scholar
  4. Barbos M, Benvenuti A (1983) Metallic debris arising from prosthetic abrasion: An investigation of biodégradation of the materials and physiology of bone. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 9: 377–386Google Scholar
  5. Bartel D, Burstein A, Santavicca E, Insall J (1982) Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 64: 1026–1033Google Scholar
  6. Beaupre G, Vasu R, Carter C, Schurman D (1986) Epiphy- seal-based designs for tibial plateau components. II. Stress analysis in the sagittal plane. J Biomech 19: 663–673Google Scholar
  7. Bennett G, Waine H, Bauer W (1942) Changes in the knee joint at various ages. The Commonwealth Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaha J, Freeman M, Revell P, Todd R (1982) The fixation of a proximal tibial polyethylene prosthesis without cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 64: 326–335Google Scholar
  9. Bobyn J, Cameron H, Abdulla D, Pilliar R, Weatherly C (1982) Biologic fixation and bone modeling with an unconstrained canine total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 166: 301–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourne R, Finlay J, Cohn N (1981) Principal strain in the human tibia before and after total knee arthroplasty. Trans Orthop Res Soc 6: 160Google Scholar
  11. Brostrom L, Gillquist J, Liljedahl S, Lindvall N (1968) Treatment of old ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. Lakartidmingen 65: 4479–4487Google Scholar
  12. Bullough P, Goodfellow J (1968) The significance of the fine structure of the articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 50: 852–857Google Scholar
  13. Bullough P, Munuera L, Murphy J, Weinstein A (1970) The strength of the menisci as it relates to fine structure. J. Bone Joint Surg (Br) 52: 564–570Google Scholar
  14. Calderale P, Scelfo G (1987) A mathematical model of thelocomotor apparatus. Eng Med 16: 147–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheal E, Hayes W, Lee C, Snyder B, Miller J (1985) Stress analysis of a condylar knee tibial component: Influence of metaphyseal shell properties and cement injection depth. J Orthop Res 3: 424–434Google Scholar
  16. Collopy M, Murray M, Gardner G, DiUlio R, Gore D (1977) Kinesiology measurements of functional performance before and after Geometric total knee replacement: One year follow-up of twenty cases. Clin Orthop 126: 196–202Google Scholar
  17. Connelly G, Rimnac C, Wright T, Hertzberg R, Manson J (1984) Fatigue crack propagation behavior of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. J Orthop Res 2: 119–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleming B, Stein A, Howe J, Pope M (1987) An in vitro comparative study of total knee arthroplasties. Trans Rehabil Eng Soc N Am 10: 256Google Scholar
  19. Fung Y (1981) Bone and cartilage. In: Biomechanics: Mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 383–413Google Scholar
  20. Garg A, Walker P (1986) The effect of the interface on the bone stresses beneath tibial components. J Biomech 19: 957–967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodfellow J, Bullough P (1967) The pattern of aging of the articular cartilage of the elbow joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 49: 175–181Google Scholar
  22. Goodfellow J, Oconnor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 60: 358–369Google Scholar
  23. Greenwald A, Black J, Matejczyk M (1981) Total knee replacement. In: The AOSS instructional course lectures, 30, pp 301–341Google Scholar
  24. Harrington I (1976) A bioengineering analysis of force actions at the knee in normal and pathological gait. J Biomed Eng 98: 167–172Google Scholar
  25. Harrison M, Scajowicz F, Trueta J (1953) Osteoarthritis of the hip: A study of the nature and evolution of the disease. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 35: 598–626Google Scholar
  26. Hood R, Wright T, Burstein A (1983) Retrieval analysis total knee prostheses: A method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 17: 829–842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huson A (1974) Biomechanische Probleme des Kniegelenks.Orthopaede 3: 119–126Google Scholar
  28. Johnson J, Krug W, Nahon D, Miller J, Ahmed A (1983) An evaluation of the load bearing capability of the cancellous proximal tibia with special interest to the design of knee implants. Trans Orthop Res Soc 8: 403Google Scholar
  29. Kapandji I (1970) The knee. In: The physiology of the joints, Vol. 2, Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 72–135Google Scholar
  30. Kettlekamp D, Chao E (1972) A method for quantitative analysis of medial and lateral compression forces at the knee during standing. Clin Orthop 83: 202–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kettlekamp D, Jacob A (1972) Tibiofemoral contact area - determination and implications. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 54: 349–356Google Scholar
  32. King R (1966) On the viscosity of synovial fluids. Rheol Acta 1: 41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landy M, Walker P (1985) Wear in condylar replacement knees: A ten year follow-up. Trans Orthop Res Soc 10: 96Google Scholar
  34. Laskin R (1988) Tricon-M uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A review of 96 knees followed for longer than 2 years. J Arthroplasty 3 (l): 27–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Le Veau B (1984) Biomechanics. A summary of perspectives.Phys Ther 64: 1812Google Scholar
  36. Lewis J, Galante J (1985) Workshop on the bone-joint implant interface. J Orthop Res 3: 380–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis J, Jaycox D, Wang O (1977) Stress analysis of some features of knee prostheses by finite elements. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2: 55Google Scholar
  38. Liljedahl S, Nordstrand A (1969) Injuries to the ligaments of the knee. Injury 1: 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manley M, Stulberg B, Stern L, Watson J, Stulberg S (1987) Direct observation of micromotion at the implant bone interface with cemented and noncemented tibial components. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12: 436Google Scholar
  40. Maquet P (1984a) Mechanics of the knee. In: Biomechanics of the knee, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 9–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maquet P (1984b) The pathomechanics of osteoarthritis of the knee. In: Biomechanics of the knee, 2nd ed. Springer- Verlag, New York, pp 75–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mathur P, McDonald J, Ghormley R (1949) A study of the tensile strength of menisci. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 31: 650–654Google Scholar
  43. Matsen FA, Sidles J, Laskin RS, Gabrini M (1988) The effects of joint line position in total knee replacement. Trans of the 54th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, p 42Google Scholar
  44. Mears D (1979) Mechanical behaviors of real materials. In: Materials in Orthopaedic surgery, 1st ed. Williams Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 92–106Google Scholar
  45. Mena D, Mansour J, Simon S (1981) Analysis and synthesis of human swing leg motion during gait and its clinical applications. B Biomech 14: 823–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Menschik A (1974) Mechanik des Kniegelenkes: I. Z Orthop 112: 481–495PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Miegel R, Walker P, Nelson P . (1986) A compliant interface for total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 4:486– 493Google Scholar
  48. Mikosz R (1985) Mathematical model for the study of forces in the human knee joint during locomotion. University of Illinois, Chicago. ThesisGoogle Scholar
  49. Mikosz R, Andriacchi T, Andersson G (1988) Analysis of factors influencing the prediction of muscle forces at the knee. J Orthop Res 6: 205–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller J (1989) Fixation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall J (ed) Surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 717–728Google Scholar
  51. Minns R (1981) Forces at the knee joint: anatomical considerations. J Biomech 14: 633–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mirra J, Amstutz H, Matos M, Gold R (1976) The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop 117: 221–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mirra J, Marder R, Amstutz H (1982) The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 170: 175–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Miura H, Whitesides L, Easley J, Amador D (1988) Effects of screws and sleeve on initial fixation in uncemented total knee tibial component. Pamphlet from the DePaul Biomechanics Laboratories, 12255 DePaul Drive, Bridgeton, MO, 63044Google Scholar
  55. Morrison J (1968) Bioengineering analysis of force actions transmitted by the knee joint. J Biomed Eng 2: 164–170Google Scholar
  56. Morrison J (1970a) The function of the knee joint in various activities. B Biomed Eng 4: 573–580Google Scholar
  57. Morrison J (1970b) The mechanics of the knee joint during normal walking. J Biomech 3: 51–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Muller W (1938) Kinematics. In: The knee: form, function, and ligament reconstruction. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 8–28Google Scholar
  59. Nisell R (1985) On the biomechanics of the knee. Acta Orthop Scand 216: 11Google Scholar
  60. Palmer I (1938) On the injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint. Acta Chir Scand 81 [Suppl] 53Google Scholar
  61. Rittman N, Kettlekamp D, Pryor P, Schwartzkopf G, Hill- berry B (19181) Analysis of patterns of knee motion walking for four types of total knee implants. Clin Orthop 155: 111–117Google Scholar
  62. Rose R, Crugnola A, Reis M . (1979) On the origins of high in vivo wear rates in polyethylene components in total joint prostheses. Clin Orthop 145: 277–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rostoker W, Chao E, Galante J (1978) The appearance of wear on polyethylene - A comparison of in vivo and in vitro wear surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 12: 317–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryd L, Lindstrand A, Rosenquist R, Selrik G (1986) Tibial component fixation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 213: 141–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Seedhom B, Dowson D, Wright V, Longton E (1972) A technique for the study of geometry and contact in normal and artificial knee joints. Wear 20: 189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Seireg A, Arvikar R (1975) The prediction of Musculoskeletal load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomech 8: 89–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shoemaker S, Markolf K, Finerman G (1982) In vitro stability of the implanted total condylar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 64: 1201–1213Google Scholar
  68. Simon S, Paul I, Mansour J, Munro M, Abernethy P, Radin E (1981) Peak dynamic force in human gait. J Biomech 14: 817–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simon S, Trieshmann H, Burdett R, Ewald F, Sledge C (1983) Quantitative gait analysis after total knee arthroplasty for monarticular degenerative arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 65: 605–613Google Scholar
  70. Stein A, Fleming B, Howe J, Pope M (1987) Total knee arthroplasty kinematics: An in vivo evaluation of four different designs. J Arthroplasty [Suppl] S31–S36Google Scholar
  71. Thatcher J, Zhou X, Walker P (1987) Inherent laxity in total knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty 2 (3): 199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Townsend P, Diamond R, Wyatt P (1979) Aspects of tibial plateau design: Condyle and stem deflections by micromotion and photo-elastic analysis. Trans Orthop Res Soc 4: 251Google Scholar
  73. Treharne R, Young R, Young S (1981) Wear of artificial joint materials III: Simulation of the knee joint using a computer controlled system. Eng Med 10: 137–142Google Scholar
  74. Vainionpaa S, Laike E, Kirves P, Tiusanen P (1981) Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 63: 938–946Google Scholar
  75. Vasu R, Carter D, Schurman D, Beaupre G (1986) Epiphy- seal-based designs for tibial plateau components. I. Stress analysis in the frontal plane. J Biomech 19: 647–662Google Scholar
  76. Walker P (1977a) Friction and wear in artificial joints. In: Human joints and their artificial replacements. Thomas, Illinois, pp 368–422Google Scholar
  77. Walker P (1977b) Lubrication and degeneration. In: Human joints and their artificial replacements. Thomas, Illinois, pp 211–252Google Scholar
  78. Walker P (1989) Requirements for successful total knee replacements. Design considerations. Orthop Clin N Am 20: 15–29Google Scholar
  79. Walker P, Hajek J (1972) The load-bearing areas in the knee joint. J Biomech 5: 581–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walker P, Hsieh H (1977) Conformity in condylar replacement knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 59: 222–228Google Scholar
  81. Walker P, Seitelman D (1978) The interdependence of rotational stiffness and contact stress in condylar replacement knee prostheses. Trans Orthop Res Soc 3: 152Google Scholar
  82. Walker P, Zhou X (1987) The dilemma of surface design in total knee replacement. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12: 291Google Scholar
  83. Walker P, Reilly D, Ben-Dov M (1980) Load transfer in the upper femur before and after tibial component attachment. Trans Orthop Res Soc 5: 16Google Scholar
  84. Walker P, Greene D, Reilly D . (1981) Fixation of tibial components of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 63: 258–267Google Scholar
  85. Whittle M (1985) Dynamic assessment of knee joint function. Eng Med 15 (2): 71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wismans J, Veldpaus F, Janssen J, Huson A, Struben P (1980) A three dimensional mathematical model of the knee joint. J Biomech 13: 677–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wright T, Bartel D (1986) The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components. Clin Orthop 205: 67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright T, Fukubayashi T, Burstein A (1981) The effect of carbon fiber reinforcement on contact area, contact pressure, and time dependent deformation in polyethylene tibial components. J Biomed Mater Res 15: 719–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wright T, Rimnac C, Faris P, Bansel M (1988) Analysis of surface damage in retrieved carbon fiber reinforced and plain polyethylene tibial components from posterior stabilized tibial components. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 0: 1312–1319Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Malcolm H. Pope
  • Braden C. Fleming

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations