Skip to main content

Nativism and Constructivism

  • Chapter
  • 402 Accesses

Abstract

We now enter the heart of the hottest debate in the history of psycholinguistics. This is the question of just what processes are innate, and how they explain language behaviour, and acquisition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Narasimhan, R., Modelling Language Behaviour (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells, Gordon, Learning through interaction: The study of language development (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981), p.86f.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Piaget, Jean, “The Psychogenesis of Knowledge and Its Epistemological Significance”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.23f.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Piaget, Jean, “Language within Cognition”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.164f.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Op. cit., p.165.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Op. cit., p.167.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piaget, Jean, “The Psychogenesis of Knowledge and Its Epistemological Significance”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.28f.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piaget, Jean, The Construction of Reality in the Child, Original Title: La Construction du Reel chez VEnfant (New York, Basic Books, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  10. McNeill, David, “The Capacity for the Ontogenesis of Grammar”, in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.19f

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ervin-Tripp, Susan, “Some Strategies for the First Years”, in Timothy E. Moore, ed., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (Academic Press, New York, 1973), p.285f.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Narasimhan, R., Modelling Language Behaviour (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981), p.69.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlesinger, I.M., “Production of Utterances and Language Acquisition” in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.6.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bowerman, Melissa, Early Syntactic Development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1973), p.211f.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See McNeill, David, “The Capacity for the Ontogenesis of Grammar”, in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schlesinger, I.M., “Production of Utterances and Language Acquisition” in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.67

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roeper, Thomas, “Connecting Children’s Language and Linguistic Theory”, in Timothy E. Moore, ed., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (Academic Press, New York, 1973), p.188.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Piatelli-Palmarini, M., ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, England, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uhr, Leonard, Pattern Recognition, Learning and Thought: Computer-Programmed Models of Higher Mental Processes (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973), p.285.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, Timothy A., Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language (Academic Press, New York, 1973), p.4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Palermo, David S., “On Learning to Talk: Are Principles Derived from the Learning Laboratory Applicable?” in Dan I. Slobin, ed., The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  23. McNeill, David, “The Capacity for the Ontogenesis of Grammar”, in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.21

    Google Scholar 

  24. cp Pike, Kenneth L., Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behavior (Mouton, The Hague, Holland, 1954/1967)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kelley, KL., Early Syntactic Acquisition (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, November 1967), pp. 64f.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Op. cit., pp. 71, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, John R., “Computer Simulation of a Language Acquisition System: A First Report”, in R. L. Solso, ed., Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1975), p.311.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Block, H.D., J. Moulton, and G. M. Robinson, “Natural Language Acquisition by a Robot” Int. J. Man-Mach, Stud., Vol. 7 (1975), pp.571–7.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Staats, Arthur W., “Linguistic-Mentalistic Theory versus an Explanatory S-R Learning Theory of Language Development”, in Dan I. Slobin, The Ontogenesis of Language (Academic Press, 1971), p.103.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Block, H.D., J. Moulton, and G. M. Robinson, “Natural Language Acquisition by a Robot”, Int. J. Man-Mach, Stud., Vol. 7 (1975), p.578f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Siklossy, Laurent, “A Language-Learning Heuristic Program”, Cognitive Psychology, Vol.2, Pt.1 (1971), p.479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kucera, Henry, “The Learning of Grammar”, Perspectives in Computing, Vol 1, No. 2 (1981), p.29.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Skinner, B.F., “The Phylogeny and Ontogeny of Behaviour” (Reprinted from Science, (1966), Vol. 153)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Melzack, R., E. Penick, and A. Beckett, “The problem of “Innate Fear” of the Hawk Shape: an Experimental Study with Mallard Ducks” (Reprinted itom Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, Vol 52, pp 694–698)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Epstein, William, “Experimental Investigations of the Genesis of Visual Space Perception” (Reprinted from Psychological Bulletin, 1964, Vol 64, pp 115–128)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Held, Richard, and Alan Hein, “Movement-Produced Stimulation in the Development of Visually Guided Behaviour” (Reprinted from Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, Vol 56, pp 872–876)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Watson, John S., “Perception of Object Orientation in Infants” (Reprinted from the Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1966, Vol 12, pp 73–94)

    Google Scholar 

  38. all in E. Endler, L. Boulter, and H. Osser, eds, Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), pp.370–385.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hockett, Charles F., “Grammar for the Hearer”, Proc. Symposia in App. Math., Vol. XII (Amer. Mathl Soc., 1961), p.3ff.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Op. cit., p.58.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Skinner, B.F., “The Phylogeny and Ontogeny of Behaviour”, in E. Endler, L. Boulter, and H. Osser, eds, Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), p.62.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Op. cit., p.70f.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Melzack, R., E. Penick, and A. Beckett, “The problem of “Innate Fear” of the Hawk Shape: an Experimental Study with Mallard Ducks” (Reprinted from Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1959, Vol 52, pp 694–698), in E. Endler, L. Boulter, and H. Osser, eds, Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), p.333.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Op. cit., p.338.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Held, Richard, and Alan Hein, “Movement-Produced Stimulation in the Development of Visually Guided Behaviour” (Reprinted from Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963, Vol 56, pp 872–876), in E. Endler, L. Boulter, and H. Osser, eds, Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), p.368.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Watson, John S., “Perception of Object Orientation in Infants” (Reprinted from the Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 1966, Vol 12, pp 73–94), in E. Endler, L. Boulter, and H. Osser, eds, Contemporary Issues in Developmental Psychology (Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), p.379.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gardner, Howard, “Cognition Comes of Age”, pp xixff, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), pxxif.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Piaget, Jean, “The Psychogenesis of Knowledge and Its Epistemological Significance”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.23.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Op. cit., p.24.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Op. cit., p.25.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Op. cit., p.30.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gardner, Howard, “Cognition Comes of Age”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.xxif.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Op. cit., p.xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chomsky, Noam A., “On Cognitive Structures and Their Development: A Reply to Piaget”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.35.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cellerier, Guy, “Some Clarifications on Innatism and Constructivism”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.83.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Thouless, Robert H., Straight and Crooked Thinking (Pan, London, UK, 1930/1953).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cellerier, Guy, “Some Clarifications on Innatism and Constructivism”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.85.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Papert, Seymour, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Psychology”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979), p.91f.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Op. cit., p.93f.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Op. cit., p.96.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fodor, Jerry, “Fixation of Belief and Concept Acquisition”, in M. Piatelli-Palmarini, ed., Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (Routledge andKegan Paul, 1969), p.151.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Op. cit., p.155.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Op. cit., p.156f.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chang, C. L., and R. C. Lee, Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving (Academic Press, 1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. Op. cit., p.189f.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Op. cit., p.197.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Kelley, K.L., Early Syntactic Acquisition (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, November 1967), p.5.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Anderson, John R., “Computer Simulation of a Language Acquisition System: A First Report”, in R. L. Solso, ed., Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1975), p.334.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Narasimhan, R., Modelling Language Behaviour (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981), p.53f.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Uhr, Leonard, Pattern Recognition, Learning and Thought: Computer-Programmed Models of Higher Mental Processes (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1973), p.10f.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. Anderson, John R., “Computer Simulation of a Language Acquisition System: A First Report”, in R. L. Solso, ed., Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, 1975), p.302ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Powers, D.M.W., Turk, C.C.R. (1989). Nativism and Constructivism. In: Machine Learning of Natural Language. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1697-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1697-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-19557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1697-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics