Advertisement

The Environmental Management Aspects of Decommissioning Offshore Structures

  • G Simpson
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

This chapter reviews the environmental management aspects of the decommissioning of offshore structures, with particular reference to the United Kingdom Continental Shelf. After some brief background material and a discussion of the principles involved, the topic is described in terms of three separate levels. Level one is defined by the minimum requirements, as set out in the legal framework and government guidelines and requirements. The second level is represented by a set of guidelines, agreed by the operating companies and published by the association that represents them, the United Kingdom Offshore Operators Association (UKOOA). These go somewhat beyond the legal minimum, and provide a management system and an environmental checklist for all offshore operations, of which decommissioning is just one. Finally, an examination of the specific case of Brent Spar will illustrate how Shell fulfilled all requirements to the letter, went some way beyond even UKOOA’s guidelines, and still encountered major difficulties. The management issue at this point goes beyond the quantitative ticking off of tasks and conditions, and into the softer qualitative areas of politics and sociology, social responsibility and ethics.

Keywords

International Maritime Organisation Environmental Management System Mooring Line Flexible Riser Offshore Installation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    North Sea Infrastructure, in “The North Sea — A Province of Excellence”, pp 84–89, a Petroleum Economist publication, December 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Quinlan, Troll breaks all records, in “The North Sea — A Province of Excellence”, pp 84–89, a Petroleum Economist publication, December 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology: Decommissioning of Oil and Gas Installations, Session 1995–6, HL Paper 46-I.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, 1958, Art 5(5).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNLOSC), 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IMO (1989). Guidelines and Standards for the removal of offshore installations and structures on the continental shelf and in the exclusive economic core. Resolution A, 672(16) of the International Maritime Organisation, October 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DTI Oil and Gas Office, Aberdeen, “Consultative Document, Guidance Notes for Industry, Abandonment of Offshore Installations and Pipelines under the Petroleum Act 1989”, May 1995Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    AURIS Ltd, August 1995, “An Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Decommissioning Options for Oil and Gas Installations in the North Sea.”Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    UKOOA, 1997. World Wide Web Page, http://www.okooa.co.uk/Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Department of Trade and Industry, 1997. The Energy Report, Oil and Gas Resources of the United Kingdom, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shell, 1997. World Wide Web Page, http://shellexpro.brentspar.com.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rudall Blanchard Associates Ltd 1994. Brent Spar Abandonment BPEO. Prepared for Shell UK Exploration and ProductionGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rudall Blanchard Associates Ltd 1994. Brent Spar Abandonment Impact Hypothesis. Prepared for Shell UK Exploration and Production.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wood Mackenzie North Sea Service, Upstream Oil & Gas, LJKCS Summary Field Data, Fields in Production/Under Development, June 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Fay, 1996. Not Black and White but Shades of Green — a Business Perspective on Reporting the Environment, a speech delivered to a media conference at the University of Wales, 20 May 1996.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Wybrew, 1996. Brent Spar — the Implications for Environmental Decision-Making and Public Support, an article written for the “Marketing Managers’ Yearbook 1996”, abstract on Shell’s World Wide Web Page, see 11. above.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G Simpson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations