Skip to main content

Teaching, Typing, Talking Two Case Studies

  • Conference paper
CALL, Culture and the Language Curriculum
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give an account of two experiments in Tandem Learning via computer conferencing during 1996 by the Modern Languages Teaching Centre at the University of Sheffield.

After a successful e-mail tandem project1 between an adult learner of German and a German native speaker, the question arose whether computer conferencing could support language learning and whether such a success in language learning could also be made using a simple tool like Talk on the Unix system or IRC on the Internet. Beauvois [2], who carried out a project in computer conferencing for classroom discussion in the foreign language, claims that real-time networks have the potential to make an impact on language learning. I was curious to find out what students would make of computer conferencing outside the classroom. For that reason two case studies involving IRC and Talk were set up and explored.

The concept of Tandem Learning has a long educational history, its origins lying in a number of mutual teaching initiatives first employed in England in the early 19th Century. In the recent past, it has taken vigorous root in a number of German universities and colleges, where it has been seized on with particular suitability for language learning. This development has been given further impetus by the advent of easily accessible international E-mail links.

In language learning, a tandem partnership brings together a pair of native-speakers of two different languages, each of whom wishes to learn the mother tongue and the culture of the other. Its guiding principle is that of mutual assistance. As well as language practice, a tandem pairing also offers the possibility of a genuine intercultural exchange. In this respect, computer conferencing offers an ideal opportunity for Tandem Learning between two learners who are located in different countries and exposed to different cultures.

This paper aims to give an account of the practical requirements for the implementation of computer conferencing and to assess its relative merits versus e-mail. Finally, I will draw conclusions, from my own experience, about good practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. St. John E, Cash D. German language learning via e-mail: a case study. ReCall Journal 1995; 7(2):47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beauvois MH. Computer-Assisted Classroom Discussion in the Foreign Language Classroom Coversation in Slow Motion. Foreign Language Annals 1992; 25(5)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moran C. We write, but do we read? Computers and Composition 1991; 8 (3): 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tuman MC. Literacy Online. The Promise (and Peril) or Reading and Writing with Computers. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friel M. The Computer as Electronic Blackboard. System 1986; 14 (3): 269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenia GD. Computers and Teaching Composition in a Foreign Language. Foreign Language Annals 1992; 25(1)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings EM. Paperless Writing Revisited. Computers and the Humanities 1990; 24: 43–48

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron NS. Computer Mediated Communication as a Force in Language Change. Visible Language 1984; XVIII (2): 118–141

    Google Scholar 

  9. Woodin J. E-mail Tandem Learning and the communicative curriculum. ReCALL Journal 1997; 9 (1): 22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Young D J. An Investigation of Students’ Perspectives on Anxiety and Speaking. Foreign Language Annals 1990; 23 (6): 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis T, Woodin J, St. John E. Learner Autonomy: Tandem Learning: Independence through Partnership. In: Broady E, Kenning MM (eds) Promoting Learner Autonomy in University Language Teaching. AFLS and CiLT, London, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

St. John, E. (1998). Teaching, Typing, Talking Two Case Studies. In: Calvi, L., Geerts, W. (eds) CALL, Culture and the Language Curriculum. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1536-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1536-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76192-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1536-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics