Skip to main content

Writing, Speaking, Drawing: the Distribution of Meaning in Architects’ Communication

  • Chapter
The New Writing Environment

Abstract

This chapter is about architects. At the end of architects’ work there is a physical creation of massive material presence, a building. Although they are closely involved with the construction of the building as well as its design, and even though they are often present on the site with dust on their hard hats and mud on their boots, architects don’t build. All they do is configure signs, including the signs that constitute writing. Their configuring of signs — alphabetic, numeric, but also, of course, graphical (that is, drawings) — makes buildings go up. How does this happen? What are the signs doing that brings about such an outcome, an outcome beyond the universe of signs, in the material world?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Applebee, A. (1984). ‘Writing and reasoning’. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, L. E. (1968). ‘The rhetorical situation’. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certeau, M. de (1984). The practice of everyday life. Trans. Steven F. Rendell. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. ( 1992, May/August). ‘The phenomenology of writing by hand’. Intelligent Tutoring Media, 3 (2/3), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P. and Pare, A. (forthcoming). Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emig, J. (1977). ‘Writing as a mode of learning’. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991). ‘The dialectics of sketching’. Creativity Research Journal, 4 (2), 123–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. (1989). ‘Cognitive dimensions of notation’, in A. Sutcliffe and L. Macauley (eds), eople and computers V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold (Nelson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1986). ‘Word, dialogue and novel’, in T. Moi (ed.), The Kristeva reader(pp. 34–61 ). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K. (1951). Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. Second edition. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nattiez, J.-J. (1990). Music and discourse: Toward a semiology of music, trans. Carolyn Abbate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglia, C. (1990). Sexual Personae: Art and decadence from Nefertiti to Emily Dickinson. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, J., Dobrin, D. and Miller, R. (1985). ‘Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization’, in L. Odell and D. Goswami (eds), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281–307 ). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L. (1992). Talking and writing in a group writing task: A sociocognitive perspective. Brighton: University of Sussex School of Cognitive and Computing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge niversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. and Pemberton, L. (1992). ‘Representing writing: External representations and the writing process’, in P. O. Holt and N. Williams (eds), Computers and writing: State of the art(pp. 319–36 ). Oxford: Intellect Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. ( 1995, February). ‘Constructing meaning in the disciplines: Reconceptualising writing across the curriculum as composing across the curriculum’. American Journal of Education, 103, 160–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978a). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978b). ‘The prehistory of written language’, chapter 8 of Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes(pp. 105–19). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, trans. newly rev. and ed. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. C. (1992a). A study of the graphical mediating representations used by collaborative authors. Brighton: University of Sussex School of Cognitive and Computing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. C. (1992b). A cultural cognitive approach to collaborative writing. Brighton: University of Sussex School of Cognitive and Computing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. C. (1993). A cognitive dimensional analysis of idea sketches. Brighton: University of Sussex School of Cognitiye and Computing Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Medway, P. (1996). Writing, Speaking, Drawing: the Distribution of Meaning in Architects’ Communication. In: Sharples, M., van der Geest, T. (eds) The New Writing Environment. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1482-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1482-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76011-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1482-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics