LIFETRACK — Enhancing Team Knowledge and Corporate Memory in Petrochemical Operations through Sharing Lessons Learnt

  • Paul Wilhelmij
  • Tony Holden
  • Barrie Reynolds
  • Boon Horng Liew

Abstract

Petrochemical plant operations have an inherent risk. To minimise these risks and prevent economic loss, injury or loss of life, operational teams need to share a compatible perspective on the plant. Otherwise, there is a risk of working at cross-purposes. This means that all operational staff should be able to draw on a consistent set of information and knowledge describing the plant and be aware of relevant experiences and lessons from past events. Maintaining a reliable corporate memory for those working in the operational environment is therefore important.

Unfortunately, due to the complexity of petrochemical plants, maintaining an effective corporate memory for operational teams is a non-trivial task. A particular complication is the need to manage on an ongoing basis “soft” factors, such as team knowledge and culture, in conjunction with the “hard” technological and systems factors. Traditional engineering and management approaches are inadequate as they do not provide an appropriate holistic framework.

The LIFETRACK project addresses the need to identify areas of risk related to soft factors in a systematic way. The result is a practical management framework, a set of operational bench marking techniques and an illustration of how electronic techniques can improve corporate memory for the benefit of operator teams. A particular focus is information use and communications at the operator level of a plant, with electronic approaches allowing improved shift handover, log keeping and recording of shift highlights by operators, and common access by all staff to a consistent plant records. Technology in the form of electronic information storage and computer-based decision support is necessary to deliver and sustain improved operational practices. Reliable information management practices must be designed into the organisational framework if this electronic storage is going to provide a sustainable corporate memory facility.

The LIFETRACK framework has been developed in collaboration with operational staff at a state-of-the-art process plant in the UK, with cross-industry critique used to ensure general applicability. Options for ongoing work include wider application and bench marking, with the development of compatible approaches and processes to share lessons learnt across the industry. A particular issue is the application of this framework to operations in developing countries, where the operational team culture and attitudes to safety reflect local rather than Western values.

Keywords

Petroleum Malaysia Kelly Ethos Olivo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Carson 93]
    Carson, PA, Mumford, CJ. Major Hazards in the Chemical Industry: Part III — A Retrospective View. Safety Sciences 16, 279–305, 1993. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [Chemical Manufacturers Association 90]
    A Manager’s Guide to Reducing Human Error: Improving Human Performance in the Chemical Industry. Chemical Manufacturers Association Inc, 2501 M Street NW, Washington DC 20037.Google Scholar
  3. [Donkin 95]
    Donkin R, Survival of the fitters: Policies that pay dividends from investing in people. Financial Times, Wednesday July 12, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. [Holden 94]
    Holden T, Glykas M, Wilhelmij GP, Reynolds R. LIFETRACK: Organisational Modelling for Safety-Critical Decision Support. Technology and Assessment of Safety-Critical Systems: Proceedings of the 2nd Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, Birmingham, February 1994. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. [Holden 95]
    Holden T, Wilhelmij GP, Chow W-Y, Cross J, Schade R. KNOVA: Modelling the Knowledge Value-Added Factors that Influence Business Process Performance in Organisations. 28th International Conference on Systems Science, Maui, USA, January 1995.Google Scholar
  6. [Hopley 92]
    Hopley I, Holden T, Wilhelmij GP. Decision Support for Energy Management Systems. IDASCO 92 International Conference on Information-Decision-Action Systems in Complex Organisations, Oxford, UK, 6-8 April 1992.Google Scholar
  7. [HSE 89]
    Human Factors in Industrial Safety. HMSO, HS(G) 48, 1989.Google Scholar
  8. [HSE 91]
    Successful Health and Safety Management. Health and Safety Executive, HS(G) 65, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. [IMS 94]
    Intelligent Manufacturing Systems: Meeting the Challenges of Global Manufacturing — World Scale Collaboration. Department of Trade and Industry, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [Investors in People 95]
    The Benefits of Being an Investor in People. Investors in People UK, IIP37R, 1995.Google Scholar
  11. [Kelly 80]
    Kelly TA. Organisations Have No Memory. Loss Prevention 13, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. [McAllister 90]
    McAllister RL, Bunnell J. Continuous Improvement Through Plantwide Integration. Control Engineering, June 1990, vol II.Google Scholar
  13. [Nimmo 95]
    Nimmo I. Outline of the Abnormal Situation Management Programme, ASM Consortium, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. [Olivo 94]
    Olivo. Loss Prevention in a Modern Ethylene Plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 1994; 7(4): 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [O’Reilly 95]
    The British are Coming: Australia at the Centre of a Wide-Ranging Investment Campaign. The Bulletin, August 15, 1995: 84-85.Google Scholar
  16. [Palframan 94]
    Palframan D. Knowledge is Power: Knova is an analytical tool that aspires to making the intangibles tangible. Financial Times, June 3, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. [UKCIC 94]
    Elliott GRE, Froome DS, Holden T, Stirling KC, Trevenna S, Wilhelmij GP. CALS — A Strategy for Industrial Competitiveness or a Cost for Compliance? DTI OSTEMS Review of US Industry Trends, October 1994.Google Scholar
  18. [Wagenaar 92]
    Wagenaar WA. Influencing Human Behavior: Toward a Practical Approach for E&P. Journal of Petroleum Technology; November 1992: 1258-1261.Google Scholar
  19. [Wilhelmij 92]
    Wilhelmij GP. Integrated Electronic Documentation for Decision Support in Safety Critical Plant Operations. IEE Colloquium on Hazard Analysis, Savoy Place, London, 9 November 1992.Google Scholar
  20. [Wilhelmij 93a]
    Wilhelmij GP, Betteridge D, Holden T. KNOVA Knowledge Value-Added Framework for Performance Improvement and Team Investment: Case Study — The Stuck Pipe Awareness Campaign. Technical Report CUED/F-INFENG/TR 147, Decision Support Group, University of Cambridge, July 1993.Google Scholar
  21. [Wilhelmij 93b]
    Wilhelmij GP, Betteridge D, Holden T, KNOVA Knowledge Value-Added Framework for Performance Improvement and Team Investment: Case Study: Team Culture on Oil Rigs in the North Sea, Gulf of Mexico & Alaska. Technical Report CUED/F-INFENG/TR 148, Decision Support Group, University of Cambridge, August 1993.Google Scholar
  22. [Wilhelmij 93c]
    Wilhelmij GP, Holden T. Knowledge Management for Reduced Risk in Petrochemical Operations. IEE Safety Critical Distributed Systems Colloquium, Savoy Place, London, 21 October 1993.Google Scholar
  23. [Wilhelmij 94]
    Wilhelmij GP. Human Factors — People and Team Lessons. DTI CALS Review of US Industry, UKCIC Conference, University College, London, 19 October 1994.Google Scholar
  24. [Wilhelmij 95a]
    Wilhelmij GP, Holden T. (ed) LIFETRACK Industry, Operational and Team Review. Decision Support Group Technical Report, Cambridge University Engineering Department, February 1995.Google Scholar
  25. [Wilhelmij 95b]
    Wilhelmij GP, Wilhelmij H, Bosch J. Landuse and Timber Resources in the South Cape Region of South Africa: Considerations for a Management Framework and Survey to Address Improved Overall Landuse. Working Paper, Cambridge University Engineering Department, 9 February 1995.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Wilhelmij
    • 1
  • Tony Holden
    • 2
  • Barrie Reynolds
    • 3
  • Boon Horng Liew
    • 2
  1. 1.BP InternationalLondonUK
  2. 2.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Honeywell ControlBracknellUK

Personalised recommendations