Abstract
In this paper we shall discuss Schön’s views on design, in particular his model of the structure of design as reflection-in-action. Our assessment of Schön’s ideas takes account of both theoretical and empirical considerations. In our view, the chief importance of Schön’s work is his plea for the emancipation of design in overly knowledge-oriented universities. He effectively criticises the rather simplistic view of professional practice as little more than the application of scientific knowledge, and his descriptions of design practice stand as a vindication of what practitioners really do. His concept of framing has proved fruitful for describing conceptual design activities. However, the Schön model of the structure of reflection-in-action does not present a radical alternative to traditional models of problem solving in design and, taken as an empirical theory, Schön’s theory of reflective practice is, admittedly, weak and fuzzy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bucciarelli L. L. 1994: Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Coyne R. 1995: Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Snodgrass A., Coyne R. 1992: Models, Metaphors and the Hermeneutics of Designing. Design Issues Vol. IX, No. 1.
Dorst K. 1997: Describing Design: A Comparison of Paradigms. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology.
Schön D.A. 1983: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.
Schön D.A. 1987: Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Schön D.A., Rein M. 1994: Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, New York.
Schön D.A. 1988: Designing: Rules, Types and Worlds. Design Studies Vol. 9, No. 3.
Ritzer G. 1975: Sociology: a Multiple Paradigm Science. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Mass.
Simon H. A. 1969: The Sciences of the Artificial MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.
Christiaans H. H. C. M., Dorst C.H., Cross N. 1993: Levels of Competence in Product Designing. In: N.F.M. Roozenburg (ed.): Proceedings International Conference on Engineering Design ICED 93. Heurista, Zürich.
Dorst C.H. 1995: Analysing Design Activity: New Directions in Protocol Analysis. Design Studies Vol. 16, No. 2.
Roozenburg N.F.M. 1993: On the Pattern of Reasoning in Innovative Design. Design Studies 14, 4–18.
Staudenmaier J. 1985: Technology’s Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Rittel W. J., Webber M. M. 1973: Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Reprinted in: N. Cross (ed.) 1984: Developments in Design Methodology. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 135 - 144.
Hillier B., Musgrove J., O’Sullivan P. 1972: Knowledge and Design. Reprinted in: N. Cross (ed.) 1984: Developments in Design Methodology. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 245–264.
De Groot A. D. 1969: Methodology: Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences. Mouton, The Hague.
Dörner D. 1996: The Logic of Failure; Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do to Make Them Right. Metropolitan Books, New York, p. 43.
Hacker W., Sachse P., Schroda, F. 1998: This volume, pp. 205–216.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roozenburg, N.F.M., Dorst, K. (1998). Describing Design as a Reflective Practice: Observations on Schön’s Theory of Practice. In: Frankenberger, E., Birkhofer, H., Badke-Schaub, P. (eds) Designers. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1270-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-1268-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive