Skip to main content

How to Improve Safety Critical Systems Standards

  • Conference paper
Book cover Safer Systems

Abstract

An effective standard for safety critical software systems is one that should help both developers and assessors of such systems. For developers it should be clear what is required in order to conform to the standard, while for assessors it should be possible to determine objectively compliance to the standard. The existing set of standards do not pass this basic quality test. We provide a framework for improving such standards. We view a standard as a collection of requirements. For each requirement we first identify the process, product, or resource that is the primary focus. Next we consider the clarity of the requirement in respect of the ease with which it is possible to assess conformance to it. We describe guidelines for interpreting requirements to make this task more objective. The method is applied extensively to the IEC 1508 Safety Critical Standard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albrecht A.J, Measuring Application Development, Proceedings of IBM Applications Development joint SHARE/GUIDE symposium. Monterey CA, pp 83–92, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Standards Institute, Specification for Safety Requirements for Pushchairs, British Standards Institute BS 4792, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton NE and Pfleeger SL, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach (2nd Edition), International Thomson Computer Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton NE, Littlewood B, and Page S, Evaluating software engineering standards and methods, in Software Engineering: A European Perspective (Ed: Thayer R, McGettrick AD), IEEE Computer Society Press, pp 463--470, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton NE, Pfleeger SL, Glass R, Science and Substance: A Challenge to Software Engineers, IEEE Software, 11(4), 86–95, July, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), Software for computers in the application of industrial safety related systems, IEC 65A, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission), Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable systems: generic aspects, IEC 1508, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defence Directorate of Standardization, Interim Defence Standard 00–55: The procurement of safety critical software in defence equipment; Parts 1–2, Kentigem House 65 Brown Street Glasgow, G2 8EX, UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfleeger SL, Fenton NE, Page P, Evaluating software engineering standards, IEEE Computer, 27(9), 71–79, Sept, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fenton, N. (1997). How to Improve Safety Critical Systems Standards. In: Redmill, F., Anderson, T. (eds) Safer Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0975-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0975-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76134-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0975-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics