Abstract
The evolution of today’s computer networks to higher bandwidths and increased connectivity to a wider range of end-user devices will further exacerbate the need for adaptive streaming solutions. Motivated by these adaptive streaming techniques, we introduce the notion of a malleable presentation and outline a framework for the transmission of such presentations across heterogeneous networks to different end-user devices. We devise a method for partitioning a schedule into independent segments. Our adaptive scheduling scheme uses the segmentation scheme to efficiently make schedule changes for delivering the highest quality presentation based on specified network bandwidth and device constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Salehi, Z. Zhang, J. Kurose, D. Towsley, “Supporting Stored Video: Reducing Rate Variability and End—to—End Resource Requirements through Optimal Smoothing”, IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 6(4), August 1998.
W. Zhao, T. Seth, M. Kim, M. Willebeek-LeMair, “Optimal Bandwidth/Delay Tradeoff for Feasible—Region—Based Scaleable Multimedia Scheduling”, Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM’98, March 1998.
W. Feng, S. Sechrest, “Critical Bandwidth Allocation for Delivery of Compressed Video”, Computer Communications, 18, October 1995.
H. Kanakia, P. Mishra, A. Reibman, “An Adaptive Congestion Control Scheme for Real-time Packet Video Transport”, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM’93, August 1993.
S. McCanne, V. Jacobson, M. Vetterli, “Receiver—driven Layered Multicast”, Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM’96, August 1996.
P. Pancha, M. El Zarki, “MPEG Coding for Variable Bit Rate Video Transmission”, IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1994.
E. Amir, S. McCanne, H. Zhang, “An Application Level Video Gateway”, Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia’95, November 1995.
L. Delgrossi, C. Halstrick, D. Hehmann, R. Herrtwich, O. Krone, J. Sandvoss, C. Vogt, “Media Scaling in a Multimedia Communication System”, Multimedia Systems Journal, Springer-Verlag, 2, 1994.
D. LeGall, “MPEG: A video compression standard for multimedia applications”, Communications of the ACM, 34(4), April 1991.
World—Wide—Web Consortium, “Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL) 1.0 Specification”, W3C Recommendation, (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-smil), June 1998.
N. Manohar, M. Willebeek-LeMair, A. Prakash, “Applying Statistical Process Controls to the Adaptive Rate Control Problem: A Framework for the Streaming of Heterogeneous Streams”, SPIE and IS&T Multimedia Computing and Networking 1998 Conference, January 1998.
M. Naghshine, M. Willebeek-LeMair, “End—to—End QoS Provisioning in Multimedia Wireless/Mobile Networks Using an Adaptive Framework”, IEEE Communications Magazine, November 1997.
L. Chiariglione, “MPEG and Multimedia Communications — A Guided Tour to MPEG—1 and MPEG—2”, (http://www.cselt.stet.it/ufv/leonardo/paper/mpeg.htm), August 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, W., Willebeek-LeMair, M., Tiwari, P. (1999). Malleable Multimedia Presentations: Adaptive Streaming Tradeoffs for Best-Quality Fast-Response Systems. In: De Natale, F., Pupolin, S. (eds) Multimedia Communications. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0859-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0859-7_17
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-135-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0859-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive