Abstract
From the viewpoint of psychology, perception is the function by which an organism gains knowledge of its environment. Equivalently, perception is the function by which sensory information is transformed into meaningful elements. In other words perception makes use of two different logics : the logic of the physical world, from which the organism extracts the information it needs by means of specialized captors, and the logic of cognition, where information is structured in the form of abstract knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Miller J.L., Kent R.D. and Atal B.S. (eds) Papers in speech communication: Speech perception. Published by the Acoustical Society of America, New York, 1991
Schouten M.E.H. (eds) The psychophysics of speech perception, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1987
Schwab E.I. and Nusbaum H.C. (eds) Pattern recognition by humans and machines, vol 1: Speech perception, Academic Press series in cognition and perception, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers, Orlando, 1986
Tokhura Y., Vatikiotis-Bateson E. and Sagisaka Y. (eds) Speech perception, production and linguistic structure, Ohmsha, Tokyo, 1992
Jakobson R., Fant G. and Halle M. Preliminaries to speech analysis: the distinctive features and their correlates, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1952
Delgutte B. and Kiang N.Y.S. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. vowel-like sounds, J. Ac. Soc. Am. 75 (3), 866ā878, 1984
Bregman A.S. Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990
Darwin C.J. Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception, J.Acoust.Soc.Am, 76, 6, 1984
McAdams S. Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86 (6), 2148ā2159, 1989
Carlson R., Granstrom B. and Fant G. Some studies concerning perception of isolated vowels, STL-QPSR 2ā3, 19ā35, 1970
Chistovitch L. A. and Lublinskaia V. V. The center of gravity effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-ike stimuli, Hearing Research, 1,185ā195, 1979
Bladon A. Two-formant models of vowel perception: shortcomings and enhancements, Speech Communication, 2, 305ā313, 1983
Miller G.A. The magical number seven plus or minus two, or, some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 63, 81ā96, 1956
Kuhl P. Speech prototypes: studies on the nature, function, ontogeny and phylogeny of the ācentersā of speech categories, in Speech perception, production and linguistic structure, eds Tokhura, Vatikiotis-Bateson and Sagisaka, Ohmsha, Tokyo, 1992
Peterson E. and Barney H.L. Control methods used in a study of the vowels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175ā184, 1952
Nearey T.M. Phonetic feature systems for vowels, doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Bloomington, 1978
Ferrari-Disner S. Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 253ā261, 1980
Delattre P., Liberman A.M. and Cooper F.S. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 27, 769ā774, 1955
Lisker L. and Abramson A.S. The voicing dimension: some experiments in comparative phonetics, in Proceedings of the 6th Int. Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Prague, Academia, 563ā567, 1970
Lienard J.S., Mlouka M., Mariani J., Sapaly J. Real-time segmentation of speech, 2nd Speech Communication Seminar, published by Almquist & Wiksell International, jointly with John Wiley & Sons, Stockholm, 1974
Lindblom B.E.F. and Studdert-Kennedy M. On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 42, 830ā843, 1967
Strange W, Jenkins J.J. and Johnson T.L. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74 (3), 695ā705, 1983
Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P. and Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code, Psychological Review 74, 431ā461, 1967
Blumstein S.E. and Stevens K.N. Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1001ā1017, 1979
Sussman H.M., McCaffrey H.A. and Matthews S.A. An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 1309ā1325, 1991
Selfridge O. Pandemonium: a paradigm for learning, in Symposium on the mechanization of thought processes, London, HM Stationery Office, 1959
Oden G.C. and Massaro W. Integration of featural information in speech perception, Psychological Review, 85 (3), 172ā191, 1978
Davis S.B. and Mermelstein P. Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences, IEEE Transactions on ASSP 28 (4), 357ā366, 1980
Miller G.A. and Nicely P. E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338ā352, 1955
Morton J. Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological review, 76, 165ā178, 1969
Marslen-Wilson W.D. Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process, Science, 189, 226ā228, 1975
McLelland J. and Elman J.L. The TRACE model of speech perception, Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1ā86, 1986
Pierrehumbert J. Synthesizing intonation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 70, 985ā995, 1981
Lehiste I. Isochrony reconsidered, Journal of phonetics, 5, 253ā263, 1977
Morton J., Marcus S.M. and Frankish C.R. Perceptual centers, Psychological Review, 83, 405ā408, 1976
McGurk H. and MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices, Nature, 264, 746ā748, 1976
Linblom B. Adaptive variability and absolute constancy in speech signals: two themes in the quest for phonetic invariance, In proceedings Xlth Int. Cong, of Phon. Sc., Tallinn, 1987
Cherry E.L. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one or two ears, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25, 975ā979, 1953
Perkell J. and Klatt D.H. (eds) Invariance and variability in speech processes, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986
Rossi M. De la quidditĆ© des variables, Actes du sĆ©minaire VariabilitĆ© et spĆ©cificitĆ© du locuteur, Ć©tudes et applications, SociĆ©tĆ© FranƧaise dāAcoustique, Luminy, 1989
Mullenix J.W., Pisoni D. and Martin C.S. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition, J. Acoust. Soc. Am 85, 365ā378, 1989
Rosch E. and Lloyd B. (eds) Cognition and categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1978
Harnad S. Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition, University Press, Cambridge, 1987
LiƩnard J.S. From speech variability to Pattern Processing: a non-reductive view of speech processing, in Levels in speech communication: relations and interactions, eds. C.Sorin et al., Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995
Laver J. The phonetic description of voice quality, University Press, Cambridge, 1980
Di Benedetto M.G. and LiƩnard J.S Influence of the vocal effort on vowels, 127th ASA meeting, Boston, June 1994
Scherer K. Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research, Psychological Bulletin, 99, (2), 143ā165, 1986
Murray I.R. and Arnott J.L. Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion, 93, (2), 1097ā1108, 1993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this paper
Cite this paper
LiƩnard, JS. (1999). Speech and Voice Perception: Beyond Pattern Recognition. In: Chollet, G., Di Benedetto, M.G., Esposito, A., Marinaro, M. (eds) Speech Processing, Recognition and Artificial Neural Networks. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0845-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0845-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-094-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0845-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive