Skip to main content

Neuropsychologically plausible sequence generation in a multi-layer network model of spelling

  • Conference paper
Connectionist Models in Cognitive Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

We investigate the possibility of incorporating the sequential dynamics of a ‘Competitive Queuing’ system in a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) architecture. The approach is applied to a model of output processes in spelling, and we show that it provides an explanation for so-called ‘Graphemic Buffer Disorder’. We describe a patient with an apparently novel dysgraphia affecting the start of words, and show that this can also be explained in terms of a simple manipulation to the model.

This work was supported by a grant from the McDonnell-Pew Program in Cognitive Neuroscience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lashley KS. The problem of serial order in behaviour. In Jefress LA. (ed) Cerebral mechanisms in behaviour. Wiley, New York, 1951. pp 112–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Houghton G. The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In Dale R, Mellish C & Zock M. (eds) Current Research in Natural Language Generation. London: Academic Press. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown GDA, Preece T & Hulme C. Oscillator-based memory for serial order. (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burgess N & Hitch JG. Towards a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language, 31. 1992. pp 429–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dell GS. The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27. 1988. pp 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glasspool DW. Competitive queuing and the articulatory loop: An extended network model. In Levy JP, Bairaktaris D, Bullinaria JA & Cairns P (eds), Connectionist Models of Memory and Language. London: UCL Press. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glasspool DW. & Houghton G. Response category constraints in serial behaviour: Consonant-vowel structure in a model of graphemic buffer disorder. (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glasspool DW, Houghton G & Shallice T. Interactions between knowledge sources in a dual-route connectionist model of spelling. In Smith LS and Hancock PJB (eds) Neural Computation and Psychology. Springer-Verlag. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hartley T & Houghton G. A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 35. 1996. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Henson RNA. Short-term memory for serial order: The Start-End model, (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Houghton G, Glasspool DW & Shallice T. Spelling and serial recall: Insights from a competitive queueing model. In Brown GDA & Ellis NC (eds), Handbook of Spelling: Theory, Process and Intervention, pp. 365–404. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milner PM. A neural mechanism for the immediate recall of sequences. Kybernetic 1. 1961. pp 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MPA & Norris DG. The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall, (submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rumelhart DE & Norman DA. Simulating a skilled typist: a study of skilled cognitive-motor performance. Cognitive Science, 6. 1982. pp 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shallice T, Glasspool DW & Houghton G. Can neuropsychological evidence inform connectionist modelling? Analyses of spelling. Language and Cognitive Processes 10. 1995. pp 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vousden JI & Brown GDA. To repeat or not to repeat: The time course of response suppression in sequential behaviour. In Bullinaria JA, Glasspool DW & Houghton G (eds) Proceedings of the fourth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop. Springer-Verlag, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jonsdottir M, Shallice T & Wise R. Language-specific differences in graphemic buffer disorder. Cognition 59. 1996. pp 169–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caramazza A & Miceli G. The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37. 1990. pp 243–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glasspool DW. Competitive Queueing dynamics in a multi-layer network. Internal Technical Report, UCL-PSY-CQ2. Dept. of Psychology, University College London. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glasspool DW. Modelling serial order in behaviour: Studies of spelling. Ph.D. thesis, Department of psychology, University College London. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Plaut DC & Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377–500. 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hinton GE. Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence 40, 1989. 185–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MRC Psycholinguistic Database. From the Oxford Text Archive, on the World Wide Web at http://www.psych.nwu.edu/psych/people/resappt/yamada/dict.html.

  24. Kucera H & Francis WN. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence: Brown University Press. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hinton G & Shallice T. Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review 98, 1991. 74–95. Deep dyslexia model lesion studies.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kay J & Hanley R. Peripheral disorders of spelling: The role of the graphemic buffer. In G.D.A. Brown & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Spelling: Theory, Process and Intervention. 1994. pp. 295–315. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McCloskey M, Badecker W, Goodman-Shulman R & Aliminosa D. The structure of graphemic representations in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 11, 1994. 341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shallice T. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Kinsbourne M & Warrington EK. A case showing selectively impaired oral spelling. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 28, 1965. 563–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kinsbourne M & Rosenfield DB. Agraphia selective for written spelling: An experimental case study. Brain and Language 1, 1974. 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Glasspool, D.W., Shallice, T., Cipolotti, L. (1999). Neuropsychologically plausible sequence generation in a multi-layer network model of spelling. In: Heinke, D., Humphreys, G.W., Olson, A. (eds) Connectionist Models in Cognitive Neuroscience. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0813-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0813-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-052-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0813-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics