Co-designing: Designers and Ergonomics

  • C. S. Porter
  • J. M. Porter
Conference paper


It is clear from the literature, and practice, that the most successful co-designing between ergonomists and designers happens in contexts where they are able to work together in a team and ergonomics and design are able to happen concurrently (Haslegrave and Holmes, 1994; Porter and Porter, 1998). However, this ‘ideal’ is often not achievable in small design houses as a consequence of financial and other constraints. It is, likewise, often not achievable for many design students working on short design projects with little or no support from an ergonomics ‘expert.’ The way in which this problem is dealt with may be by ignoring, or by paying ‘lip service’ to the identification of ergonomics issues and problems and die appropriate ways of dealing with them. Hasdogen (1995) supports this view; in her investigation of human models used by product designers and ergonomists in the product design industry, she also found the product designers critical of the ergonomics models and methods available to them.


Design Project User Population Apply Ergonomics Design Student Tutorial Session 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bonner J (1999) Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  2. Burns CM, Vicente KJ, Christofferson K, Pawlak WS (1997) Towards viable, useful and usable human factors guidance. Applied Ergonomics 28, 5 /6: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Haslegrave CM, Holmes K (1994) Integrating ergonomics and engineering in the technical design process. Applied Ergonomics 25,4: 211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hasdogen G (1995) The nature and limitations of user models in the household product design process. Design Studies 17,1: 19–33Google Scholar
  5. Jordan PW (1998) Human Factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29, 1: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jordan PW (1999) In: Green WS, Jordan PW (eds.) Human factors and product design. Taylor and Francis, London, pp l5–25Google Scholar
  7. Peebles L, Norris B (1998) Adultdata. Department of Trade and Industry. Crown copyrightGoogle Scholar
  8. Porter CS, Porter JM (1997) In: Green, WS, Jordan PW (eds.) Human factors and product design. Taylor and Francis, London, pp l5–25Google Scholar
  9. Rice S (2000) Pleasure versus utility. Internal Report. Coventry School of Art and Design, Coventry UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. Vicente KJ, Burns CM, Pawlak WS (1998) Better handbooks, better design. Ergonomics in Design: 21–27Google Scholar
  11. Woodcock A, Galer Flyte M (1995) The opaque interface - the development of an on-line database of ergonomics information for automotive designers. HCI ′95 Adjunct proceedings, pp 96–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. Porter
  • J. M. Porter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations