Skip to main content

Clinical Coronary Heart Disease

  • Chapter
British Cardiology in the 20th Century
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiologists did not regard coronary heart disease as an important part of their specialty until well after the second world war. General practitioners or general physicians cared for most patients with angina and myocardial infarction, and it was not until the advent of coronary care units and the development of techniques such as arteriography and echocardiography that it was appreciated (at least in the United Kingdom) that cardiologists had an essential role in the diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and notes

  1. Peel AAF. Diseases of the heart. London: Oxford University Press, 1947:292.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wood P. Diseases of the heart and circulation. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewis T. Disease of the heart. 3rd ed. London: Macmillan, 1946:60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wood P. Diseases of the heart and circulation. 2nd ed. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1956 (reprinted 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wright IS, Marple CD, Beck DF. Report of the committee for the evaluation of anticoagulants in the treatment of coronary thrombosis with myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1948;36:801–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilchrist AR, Tulloch JA. Anticoagulants in coronary disease. BMJ 1954;2:720.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffiths GC. The treatment of shock associated with myocardial infarction. Circulation 1954;9:527–32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Peel AAF, Semple T, Wang I, Lancaster WM, Dall JLC. A coronary prognostic index for grading the severity of myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1962;24:745–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Norris RM, Brandt PWT, Caughey DE, Lee AJ, Scott PJ. A new coronary prognostic index. Lancet 1969;i:278–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocker GG. Closed-chest cardiac massage. JAMA 1960;173:1064–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Julian DG. Treatment of cardiac arrest in acute myocardial ischaemia and infarction. Lancet 1961;ii:840–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas M, Malmcrona R, Shillingford JP. Hemodynamic changes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1965;31:811–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mackenzie GJ, Taylor SH, Flenley DC, McDonald AH, Staunton HP, Donald KW. Circulatory and respiratory studies in myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Lancet 1964;ii:825–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cochrane AL. Effectiveness and efficiency. London: Nuffield Hospital Trust, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rose G. The contribution of intensive coronary care. Br J Prev Soc Med 1965;29:147–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oliver MF, Julian DG, Donald KW. Problems in evaluating coronary care units. Am J Cardiol 1967;20:465–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mather HG, Morgan DC, Pearson NG, et al. Myocardial infarction: a comparison between home and hospital care for patients. BMJ 1976;1:925–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill JD, Hampton JR, Mitchell JRA. A randomised trial of home versus hospital management for patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Lancet 1978;i:837–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lie KI, Wellens HJJ, Downar E, Durrer D. Observations on patients with primary ventricular fibrillation complicating myocardial infarction. Circulation 1975;52:75–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell RWF, Murray A, Julian DG. Ventricular arrhythmias in first 12 hours of acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1981;46:351–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pantridge JF, Geddes JS. A mobile coronary care unit in the management of myocardial infarction. Lancet 1967;ii:271–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISIS-4 Collaborative Group. Fourth international study of infarct survival. A randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58 050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1995;435:669–85.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Suprawivenza nell’infarto Miocardico. GISSI-3. Effect of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6 week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1994;343:1115–22.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISIS-1 Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous atenolol among 16 027 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-1. Lancet 1986;ii:57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woods KL, Ketley D, Lowy A, et al. (3-blockers and antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1998;19:74–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. ISIS-2 Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17 187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-2. Lancet 1988;i:349–60.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Delia Streptokinase Nell’infarto Miocardico.(GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986;i:397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  28. ISIS-3 (Third International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. ISIS-3: a randomised comparison of streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator vs anistreplase and of aspirin plus heparin vs aspirin alone among 41 299 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1992;339:753–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. The International Study Group. In-hospital mortality and clinical course of 20 891 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction randomised between alteplase and streptokinase with or without heparin. Lancet 1990;336:71–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. The GUSTO Investigators. An international randomized trial comprising four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993;329:673–82.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weston CF, Penny WJ, Julian DG. Guidelines for the early management of patients with myocardial infarction. British Heart Foundation Working Group. BMJ 1994;308:767–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. GREAT Group. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners. Grampian region early anistreplase trial. BMJ 1992;305:548–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Birkhead JS. Thrombolytic treatment for myocardial infarction; an examination of practice in 39 United Kingdom hospitals. Myocardial Infarction Audit Group. Heart 1997;78:28–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Norris RM. Sudden cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction in three British health districts, The UK heart attack survey. London: British Heart Foundation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Medical Research Council. Second report of the working party on anticoagulant therapy in coronary thrombosis. BMJ 1964;2:837–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitchell JRA. Anticoagulants in coronary disease-retrospect and prospect. Lancet 1981;i:257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Multicentre International Study. Improvement in prognosis of myocardial infarction by long-term β-adrenoceptor blockade using practolol. BMJ 1975;3:735–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Baber NS, Wainwright Evans D, Howitt G, et al. A multicentre propranolol post-infarction trial in 49 hospitals in the United Kingdom, Italy and Yugoslavia. Br Heart J 1980;44:419–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Norwegian Multicenter Study Group. Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1981;304:801–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Beta-blocker Heart Attack Study Group (BHAT). A beta-blocker heart attack trial. JAMA 1981;246:2073–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chamberlain DA, Jewitt DE, Julian DG, et al. Oral mexiletine in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction. Lancet 1980;ii:1324–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. Lancet 1993;342:821–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moyé LA, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1992;327:669–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kober L, Torp-Pedersen, C, Carlsen JE, et al. for the Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation Study Group. A clinical trial of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor trandolapril with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1670–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Heberden W. Some account of a disorder of the breast. Med Trans R Coll Physicians Lond 1772;2:59.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Herrick JB. Clinical features of sudden obstruction of the coronary arteries. JAMA 1912;59:2015–20.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stowers M, Short D. Warning symptoms before major myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1970;32:833–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wood P. Acute and subacute coronary insufficiency. BMJ 1961;1:1779–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Krauss KR, Hutter AM Jr, De Sanctis RW. Acute coronary insufficiency: course and follow-up. Circulation 1972;45(suppl I):66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fulton M, Duncan B, Lutz W, et al. Natural history of unstable angina. Lancet 1972;i:860–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Fulton M, Julian DG. Unstable angina. In: Julian DG ed. Angina pectoris. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lewis HD Jr, Davis JW, Archibald DG, et al. Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1983;309:396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cairns JA, Gent M, Singer J, et al. Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone or both in unstable angina. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1369–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. The Holland Interuniversity Nifedipine/Metoprolol Trial (HINT) Research Group. Early treatment of unstable angina in the coronary unit. Br Heart J 1986;56:400–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Adams PC, Skinner JS, Cohen M, McBride R, Fuster V. Acute coronary syndromes in the United States and the United Kingdom: a comparison of approaches. The Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes Research Group. Clin Cardiol 1998;21:348–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Prinzmetal M, Kennamar R, Merliss R, Wada T, Bor N. A variant form of angina pectoris. Am J Med 1959;27:375–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Maseri A, Severi S, Nes MD, et al. Variant angina: one aspect of a continuous spectrum of vasospastic myocardial ischemia. Pathogenetic mechanisms, estimated incidence and clinical and coronary arteriography findings in 138 patients. Am J Cardiol 1978;42:1019–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Master AM, Rosenfeld I. Two-step exercise test: current status after 25 years. Modern Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1967;36:19–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Balcon R, Maloy WE, Sowton E. Clinical use of atrial pacing test in angina pectoris. BMJ 1968;610:91–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Modern Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 1962;31:735–38.

    Google Scholar 

  61. European Coronary Surgery Study Group. Coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris: survival at two years Lancet 1979;ii:889–93.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Grüntzig AR. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis Lancet 1978;i:263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Working Party of the Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians of London. The investigation and management of stable angina pectoris. J R Coll Physicians 1993;27:267–73.

    Google Scholar 

  64. De Bono D for the Joint Working Party of the British Cardiac Society and the Royal College of Physicians of London. Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998. Heart 1999;81:546–55.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Sculpher MJ, Pettigrew M, Kelland JL, Elliott RA, Holdright DR, Buxton MJ. Resource allocation for chronic stable angina: a systematic review of effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of alternative interventions. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Spinger-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Julian, D. (2000). Clinical Coronary Heart Disease. In: Silverman, M.E., Fleming, P.R., Hollman, A., Julian, D.G., Krikler, D.M. (eds) British Cardiology in the 20th Century. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0773-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0773-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1199-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0773-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics