BIS 2000 pp 121-133 | Cite as

Integrating Intelligent Software Agents into Collaborative Environments to Support Organizational Learning

  • Marcelo Milrad
  • Kristian Folkman

Abstract

The use of computers in networked, collaborative learning is increasing. Many applications are evolving towards highly interactive collaborative environments for learning. Another trend is observable: features that traditionally have been developed for e-business might support adaptive learning systems and they provide a platform for collaborative actions among learners. In this paper we will discuss those aspects related to the use of intelligent software agents in shared learning environments to support collaboration and knowledge construction.

Keywords

Europe Assimilation Expense Arena Univer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agyris C., Schon D.A. Organisational learning II. Addison-Wesley, 1996Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boy G.A . Software Agents for Cooperative Learning. In: Software Agents. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1997Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown J.S., Collins A., Duguid S. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 1989, pp 32 – 42Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cochinaux P., de Woot P. Moving Towards a Learning Society. A CRE-ERT Report on European Education, 1995Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drucker P. The Post Capitalist Society. Editorial Sudamericana, 1995Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT). Investing in Knowledge: The Integration of Technology in European Education. An ERT publication, 1997Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fischer G. Lifelong Learning Mindsets. In: Proceedings of ICCE 99 - New Human Abilities for the Networked Society, vol. 1, IOS Press, 1999, pp 21–30Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fjuk A. Incorporating networked computers and collaborative learning. LLine - Lifelong learning in Europe, 1999Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folkman K. Undersokelse blant hjemmepc brukere i Telenor. Internal research report. Unpublished, Telenor Corporate University, 1999Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    GargarianG. The Art of Design. In: Kafai Y., ResnickM. (eds) Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1996, pp 125 – 160Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hesselbein F., Goldsmith M., Beckhard R. Organization of the future. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1997Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kearsley G. Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory into Practice Database. 1994, see http://gvis2.circ.gvu.edu/~kearsley/Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lester J., Converses S., Kahler S., Barlow T., Stone B., Bhogal R. The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. Proceedings of CHI ’97, 1998, pp 359 – 366Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lave J., WengerE. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maes P. Agents That Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM, 1994; 37 (7): 31 – 40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mantovani G. New Communication Environments: From Everyday to Virtual. Taylor & Francis, 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marton F., Hounsell D., Entwistle N. Hur vi lar. Vol. 1. Kristianstad: Raben & Sjogren, 1986Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meister J.C. Corporate Universities. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minsky M. The Society of Mind, Simon & Schuster, 1986Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nardi B. Context and consciousness: Activity Theory in Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ogata H., Yano Y. Combining Social Networks and Collaborative Learning in Distributed Organizations. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 99, vol. 1, AACE Press, 1999, pp 119 – 125Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papert S. The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York, Basic Books, 1993Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schofield J.W. Computers and classroom culture. Cambridge University Press, 1995Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sfard A. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Research, 1998; 27 (2): 4 – 12Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spector J.M., Wasson B., Lindstrom B. A Theoretical foundation for the design of online collaborative learning environments. Discussion Paper for VITAL ’98, 1998Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Selker T. COACH: A teaching Agent that Learns. Communications of the ACM, 1994; 37 (7): 92 – 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sheth B., Maes P. Evolving Agents for Personalized Information Filtering. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shneiderman B. User Interfaces for Creativity Support Tools. Conference Proceedings of Creativity & Cognition 99, Loughborough, UK, ACM Press, 1999Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Singh M.P., Huhns M.N. (eds) Readings in Agents. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1997Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shute V., Psotka J. Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Past, Present and Future. In: Jonassen D. (ed) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 1994Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shuell T. The role of the student in learning from instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychologist, 1988; 13: 276 – 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vassileva J. Goal-Based Autonomous Social Agents, Supporting Adaptation and Teaching in a Distributed Environment. 1997, http://www.cs.usask.ca/staff/jiv/Texte/VassilevaJ.html Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wasson B . Advanced educational technologies: The learning environment. Computers in Human Behaviour, 1997; 13 (4): 571 – 594Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wasson B. Identifying coordination agents for collaborative telelearning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9. 3 /9. 4, 1998Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag London Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcelo Milrad
    • 1
  • Kristian Folkman
    • 2
  1. 1.The Institute for Media Technology (IMT)JönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Telenor Corporate UniversityGrimstadNorway

Personalised recommendations