Skip to main content

Sequencing Training Examples for Iterative Knowledge Refinement

  • Conference paper
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVI

Abstract

Refinement tools seek to correct faulty knowledge based systems (KBSs) by identifying and repairing faults that are indicated by training examples for which the KBS gives an incorrect solution. Refinement tools typically use a hill-climbing search to identify suitable repairs. Backtracking search algorithms, developed for constraint satisfaction problems, have been incorporated with an iterative knowledge refinement tool, to solve local maxima problems. This paper investigates how the efficiency of such a tool can be improved and introduces new and general heuristics for ordering training examples. Experimental results reveal that these heuristics applied to static and dynamic ordering of training examples can significantly improve the efficiency of the iterative refinement tool, without increasing the error-rate of the final refined KBS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. R. Bitner and E. Reingold. Backtrack programming techniques. Communications of the ACM, 18: 651–656, 1975.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Blake and E. Keogh and C.J. Merz. UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases. In University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences, 1998. www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robin Boswell, Susan Craw, and Ray Rowe. Knowledge refinement for a design system. In Enric Plaza and Richard Benjamins, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, pages 49–64, Sant Feliu de Guixols, Spain, 1997. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Susan Craw and Robin Boswell. Representing problem-solving for knowledge refinement. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 227–234, Menlo Park, California, 1999. AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rina Dechter and Itay Meiri. Experimental evaluation of preprocessing algorithms for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 68: 211–341, 1994.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Daniel Frost and Rina Dechter. Look-ahead value ordering for constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth IJCAI Conference, pages 572–578, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Gaschnig . Performance measurements and analysis of certain search algorithms. Technical Report CMU-CS-79-124, Carnegie-Mellon University, PA, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ian Gent, Ewan MacIntyre, Patrick Prosser, Barbara Smith, and Toby Walsh. An empirical study of dynamic variable ordering heuristics for the constraint satisfaction problem. In in Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pages 179–193. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.M. Haralick and G.L. Elliott. Increasing tree-search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems. Artificial Intelligence, 14: 263–313, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grzegorz Kondrak and Peter van Beek. A theoretical evaluation of selected backtracking algorithms. Artificial Intelligence, 89: 365–387, 1997.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Steven Minton, Mark D. Johnston, Andrew B. Philips, and Philip Laird. Minimizing conflicts: A heuristic repair method for constraint satisfaction and scheduling problems. Artificial Intelligence, 58: 161–205, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Ourston and R. Mooney. Theory refinement combining analytical and empirical methods. Artificial Intelligence, 66: 273–309, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Michael J. Pazzani. Student loan relational domain. In UCI Repository of Machine Learning Databases [2], 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Richards and R. Mooney. Automated refinement of first-order horn-clause domain theories. Machine Learning, 19: 95–131, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norman M. Sadeh and Mark S. Fox. Variable and value ordering heuristics for the job shop scheduling constraint satisfaction problem. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Expert Systems in Production and Operations Management, pages 134–144, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barbara Smith and Stuart Grant. Trying harder to fail first. In Proceedings of the ECAI98 Conference, pages 249–253, Brighton, UK, 1998. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Edward Tsang. Foundations of Constraint Satisfaction. Academic Press, San Diego, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nirmalie Wiratunga and Susan Craw. Incorporating backtracking search with knowledge refinement. In Anca Vermesan and Frans Coenen, editors, Proceedings of the Sixth European Symposium on the Validation and Verification of Knowledge Based Systems, Oslo, Norway, 1999. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wiratunga, N., Craw, S. (2000). Sequencing Training Examples for Iterative Knowledge Refinement. In: Bramer, M., Macintosh, A., Coenen, F. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0745-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0745-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-231-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0745-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics