Cancer and Pregnancy: Bioethical and Legal Dilemmas

  • Frank A. Chervenak
  • Laurence B. McCullough
Chapter

Abstract

Ethics is an essential dimension of the management of cancer in pregnancy.1 In this chapter we define ethics, medical ethics and two basic ethical principles, and develop the concept of the fetus as a patient. We then apply these concepts to the clinical issues of counseling and advance directives in the care of prepared patients with cancer.2

Keywords

Hydration Expense Defend Univer Preven 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thorny S, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. # Cancer Bull 1994; 5: 391–94Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Englehardt, Jr, HT. The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd edn. New York, Oxford University Press, 1996Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beauchamp TL, McCullough LB. Medical Ethics: The Moral Responsibilities of Physicians. England Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1984Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th edn. New York, Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, Oxford University Press, 1986Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strong C. Ethics in Reproductive Medicine: A New Framework. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dustan GR. The moral status of the human embryo. A tradition recalled. J Med Ethics 1984; 10: 38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elias S, Annas GJ. Reproductive Genetics and the Law. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers, 1987Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evans MI, Fletcher JC, Zador IE, et al. Selective first-trimester termination in octuplet and quadruplet pregnancies: Clinical and ethical issues. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 289–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ruddick W, Wilcox W. Operating on the fetus. Hastings Cent Report 1982; 12: 10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macklin R. Abortion: Contemporary Ethical and Legal Aspects. In: Reich WT (ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 2nd edn. New York, Macmillan, 1995: 6–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hellegers AE. Fetal development. Theological Studies 1970; 31: 3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noonan JT (ed.) The Morality of Abortion. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1970Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bopp J (ed.) Restoring the Right to Life: The Human Life Amendment. Provo, Brigham Young University, 1984Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bopp J (ed.) Human Life and Health Care Ethics. Frederick, University Publications of America, 1985Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Noonan JT. A Private Choice. Abortion in America in the Seventies. New York, The Free Press, 1979Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Callahan S, Callahan D (eds.) Abortion: Understanding Differences. New York, Plenum Press, 1984Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roe v. Wade,410 US 113 (1973)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. What is obstetric ethics? J Perinat Med 1996; 3: 331–41Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fost N, Chudwin D, Wikker D. The limited moral significance of fetal viability. Hastings Cent Rep 1980; 10; 10–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahowald M. Beyond abortion: Refusal of Cesarean section. Bioethics 1989; 3: 106–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hack M, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants between 1982 and 1988. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1642–7Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Whyte HE, Fitzhardinge PM, et al. External immaturity: outline of 568 pregnancies of 23–26 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 1–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Perinatal ethics: A practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 442–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The limits of viability. J Perinat Med 1997; 25: 418–20PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank A. Chervenak
  • Laurence B. McCullough

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations