Investigations

  • Richard F. Labasky
Chapter

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of a woman’s incontinence and prolapse is essential to guide treatment decisions, and because these problems may merely be indicators of more serious processes such as neoplasm, obstruction, or neurological diseases.1The evaluation process should lead to accurate diagnoses, and use appropriate diagnostic tests, while avoiding unnecessary ones. The evaluation should also provide an understanding of the patient’s health and personal status to facilitate wise counseling about what treatments will be successful and safe for her. The evaluation includes noting details of the patient’ssymptoms of incontinence and prolapse, confirming thesigns of urinary loss and prolapse, and possibly performing tests to isolate specifically the pathophysiological causes of the conditions.2-4 The basic evaluation with all three steps — history, examination, basic tests, and an optional simple “bedside CMG” (see later) — leads to accurate dianoses that correlate with the patient’s problems of incontinence and prolapse in about 80% of patients, especially for those with stress incontinence.5-12 If the basic evaluation fails to provide an adequate diagnosis, imaging studies, cystourethroscopy, and formal urodynamics — detailed neurophysiologic tests of the lower urinary tract — are used to confirm diagnoses. To be considered accurate and useful, it is essential that the final diagnoses correlate with the patient’s primary complaints and symptoms.

Keywords

Catheter Neuropathy Barium Sponge Proteinuria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blaivas JG, Bhimani G, Labib KB (1979) Vesicourethral dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. J Urol 122: 342 – 7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT (1988) The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn 7: 403 – 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Anderson JT (1988) The International Continence Society Committee on Standardization of Terminology: the standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Scand J Urol Nephrol 114S: 5 – 19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blaivas JG, Appell RA, Fantl JA et al. (1997) Definition and classification of urinary incontinence: recommendations of the Urodynamic Society. Neurourol Urodyn 16: 149 – 51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeBeau CE, Resnick NM (1991) Evaluation of the causes and severity of geriatric incontinence. Urol Clin N Amer 18: 243 – 56.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Videla FLG, Wall LL (1998) Stress incontinence diagnosed without multichannel urodynamic studies. Obstet Gynecol 91: 965 – 8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carey MP, Dwyer PL, Glenning pp. (1997) The sign of stress incontinence- Should we believe what we see? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 37: 436 – 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haylen BT, Sutherst JR, Frazer MI (1989) Is the investigation of most stress incontinence really necessary? Br J Urol 64: 147 – 9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Summitt RL, Stovall TG, Bent AE, Ostergard DR (1992) Urinary incontinence: correlation of history and brief office evaluation with multichannel urodynamic testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 1835 – 44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walters MD, Shields LE (1988) The diagnostic value of history, physical examination, and the Q-tips cotton swab test in women with urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159: 145 – 9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Diokno AC, Dimaculangan RR, Lim EU, Steinert BW (1999) Office based criteria for predicting type II stress incontinence without further evaluation studies. J Urol 161: 1263 – 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fantl JA, Newman DK, Colling J et al. (1996) Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Acute and Chronic Management. Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 2. AHCPR Publication No. 96-0682. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bump RC, Mattiasson MD, Bo K et al. (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 10 – 17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Snyder JA, Westmacott R (1991) Treatment of mild, moderate and severe cystoceles. Probl Urol 5: 85 – 93.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stamey TA (1980) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence in females. Ann Surg 192: 465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Versi E, Orrego G, Hardy E et al. (1996) Evaluation of the home pad test in the investigation of female urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103: 162 – 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siltberg H, Victor A, Larsson G (1997) Pad weighing tests: the best way to quantify urine loss in patients with incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76 (166S): 28 – 32.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryhammer AM, Djurhuus JC, Laurberg S (1999) Pad testing in incontinent women: a review. Int Urogynecol J 10: 111 – 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elser DM, Fantl JA, McClish DK (1995) The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Comparison of subjective and objective measures of severity of urinary incontinence in women. Neurourol Urodyn 14: 311 – 16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber AM, Walters MD, Ballard LA, Booher DL, Piedmonte MR (1998) Posterior vaginal prolapse and bowel function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179: 1446 – 50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wyman JF, Choi SC, Harkins SW, Wilson MS, Fantl JA (1988) The urinary diary in evaluation of incontinence in women: a test-retest analysis. Obstet Gynecol 71: 812 – 17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steele AC, Kohli N, Mallipeddi P, Karram M (1999) Pharmacologic causes of female incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 10: 106 – 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barber MD, Cundiff GW, Weidner AC et al. (1999) Accuracy of clinical assessment of paravaginal defects in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181: 87 – 90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sampselle CM, DeLancey JOL (1998) Anatomy of female continence. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 25: 63 – 74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW et al. (1996) Inter- observer and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 1467 – 71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blaivas JG, Olsson CA (1988) Stress incontinence: classification and surgical approach. J Urol 139: 727 – 31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Haab F, Zimmern PE, Leach GE (1996) Female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: recognition and management. J Urol 156: 3 – 17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bump RC, Coates KW, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Weidner AC (1997) Diagnosing intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: comparing urethral closure pressure, urethral axis, and Valsalva leak point pressures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177: 303 – 10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghonheim GM, Walters F, Lewis V (1994) The value of the vaginal pack test in large cystoceles. J Urol 152: 931 – 4.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blaivas JG, Zayed AAH, Labib KB (1981) The bulbo- cavernosus reflex in urology: a prospective study of 299 patients. J Urol 126: 197 – 9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bergman A, McKenzie C, Ballard C, Richmond J (1988) Role of cystourethrography in the preoperative evaluation of stress incontinence in women. J Reprod Med 33: 372 – 6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Greenwald SW, Thornburg JR, Dunn LJ (1967) Cystourethrography as a diagnostic aid in stress incontinence: an evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 29: 324 – 7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pelsang RE, Bonney WW (1996) Voiding cystourethrography in female stress incontinence. AJR 166: 561 – 5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dietz HP, Wilson PD (1998) Anatomical assessment of the bladder outlet and proximal urethra using ultrasound and videocystourethrography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 9: 365 – 9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Schuessler B, Haller U (1995) Perineal ultrasound for evaluating the bladder neck in urinary stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85: 220 – 4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mostwin JL, Yang A, Sanders R, Genadry R (1995) Radiography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging for stress incontinence. Contributions, uses, and limitations. Urol Clin N Amer 22: 539 – 49.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Huddleston HT, Dunnihoo DR, Huddleston PM, Meyers PC (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of defects in DeLancey’s vaginal support levels I, II, III. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172: 1778 – 82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aronson MP, Bates SM, Jacoby AF, Chelmow D, Sant GR (1995) Periurethral and paravaginal anatomy: an endovagi- nal magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 1702 – 8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hock D, Lombard R, Jehaes C et al. (1993) Colpo cystodefecography. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 1015 – 21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Altringer WE, Saclarides TJ, Dominguez JM, Brubaker LT, Smith C (1995) Four-contrast defecography: pelvic. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 695 – 9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Govier FE, Pritchett TR, Kornman JD (1994) Correlation of the cystoscopic appearance and functional integrity of the female urethral sphincteric mechanism. Urology 44: 250 – 3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Labasky RF (1997) Endoscopic Evaluation. In: Donnell PD (ed) Urinary Incontinence. Mosby, St. Louis, Mo., pp. 115 – 22.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cundiff GW, Bent AE (1996) The contribution of urethro- cystoscopy to evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction in women. Int Urogynecol J 7: 307 – 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aagaard J, Bruskewitz R (1991) Are urodynamic studies useful in the evaluation of female incontinence? Probl Urol 5: 11 – 22.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Labasky RF (1972) Urodynamics. In: Smith JA (ed) High Tech Urology: Technologic Innovations and Their Clinical Applications. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 140 – 8.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Coates KW, Harris RL, Cundiff GW (1997). Uroflowmetry in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Br J Urol 80: 217 – 21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Coates KW (1998) Physiologic evaluation of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Amer 25: 805 – 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dmochowski R (1996) Cystometry. Urol Clin N Amer 23: 243 – 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kulseng-Hanssen S (1997) Reliability and validity of stationary cystometry, stationary cysto-urethrometry and ambulatory cysto-urethro-vaginometry. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76 (166S): 33 – 8.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brown K, Hilton P (1997) Ambulatory monitoring. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 8: 369 – 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vereecken RL, Nuland T Van (1998) Detrusor pressure in ambulatory versus standard urodynamics. Neurourol Urodyn 17: 129 – 33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Swithinbank LV, James M, Shepherd A, Abrams P (1999) Role of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring in clinical urological practice. Neurourol Urodyn 18: 215 – 22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    McGuire EJ, Fitzpatrick CC, Wan J et al. (1993) Clinical assessment of urethral sphincter function. J Urol 150: 1452 – 4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nitti VW, Combs AJ (1996) Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 155: 281 – 5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    McGuire EJ (1995) Urodynamic evaluation of stress incontinence. Urol Clin N Amer 22: 551 – 5.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bump RC, Elser DM, Theofrastous JP, McClish DK (1995) Continence Program for Women Research Group. Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress incontinence: reproducibility, effect of catheter caliber, and correlation with other measures of urethral resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 551 – 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57..
    Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL (1996) [14] RC. The effect of vesical volume on Valsalva leak point pressures in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 87:711–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Petrou S, Kollmorgen TA (1998) Valsalva leak point pressure and bladder volume. Neurourol Urodyn 17: 3 – 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Miklos JR, Karram MM (1995) A critical appraisal of the methods of measuring leak-point pressures in women with stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86: 349 – 52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO, Wozniak-Petrofsky J (1997) Leak point pressures in women with urinary stress incontinence: correlation with patient history. J Urol 157: 818 – 20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McGuire EJ, Appell RA (1991) Collagen injection for the dysfunctional urethra. Contemp Urol 3 (9): 11 – 19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Appell RA (1994) Collagen injection therapy for urinary incontinence. Urol Clin N Amer 21: 177 – 82.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wan J, McGuire EJ, Bloom DA, Ritchey ML (1993) Stress leak point pressure: a diagnostic tool for incontinence children. J Urol 150: 700 – 2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK (1995) The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 407 – 14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hextall A, Boos K, Cardozo L et al. (1998) Video-cystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ. A clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dyfunct 9: 205 – 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Choe JM, Gallo ML, Staskin DR (1999) A provocative maneuver to elicit cystometric instability: measuring instability at maximum infusion. J Urol 161: 1541 – 4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG, Kaplan SA, Axelrod S (1991) Bladder outlet obstruction versus impaired detrusor con-tractility: the role of uroflow. J Urol 145: 810 – 12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Farrar DJ, Whiteside CG, Osborne JL, Turner-Warwick RT (1975) A urodynamic analysis of micturition symptoms in the female. Surg Gynecol Obstet 141: 875 – 81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lose G (1997) Urethral pressure measurement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76 (166S): 39 – 4.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, Cross CA, O’Connell HE (1996) Videourodynamic studies. Urol Clin N Amer 23: 309 – 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ouslander JG, Leach GE, Staskin DR (1989) Simplified tests of lower urinary tract function in evaluation of geriatric urinary incontinence. J Am Geriatr Soc 37: 706 – 14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sand PK, Brubaker LT, Novak T (1991) Standing incremental cystometry as a screening method for detrusor instability. Obstet Gynecol 77: 453 – 7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fonda D, Brimage PJ, D’Astoli M (1993) Simple screening for urinary incontinence in the elderly: comparison of simple and multichannel cystometry. Urology 42: 536 540.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Frenckner B, Van Euler C (1975) Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 16: 482 – 489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS (1979) A clinical study of patients with faecal incontinence and diarrhoea. Gastroenterology 76: 757 – 756.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Read NW, Haynes WG, Bartolo DCC (1983) Use of anorectal manometry during rectal infusion of saline to investigate sphincter function in incontinent patients. Gastroenterology 85: 105 – 13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nivatvongs S, Stern HS, Fryd DS (1981) The length of the anal canal. Dis Colon Rectum 67: 216 – 20.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen N (1986) New method for assessment of anal sensation in various anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 73: 310 – 312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Kiff E (1983) The clinical use of anorectal physiology studies. Sir Alan Parks Memorial Symposium. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 158: 498 – 512.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Neal ME, Swash M (1980) Increased motor unit fiber density in the external anal sphincter muscle in ano-rectal incontinence: a single fibre EMG study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 43: 343 – 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Nicholls RJ, Henry MM (1988) Increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with defecation straining. Br J Surg 75: 1095 – 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vernava AM III, Longo WE, Daniel GL (1992) Pudendal neuropathy and the importance of EMG evaluation of faecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 11.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Deen KI, Kumar D, Williams JG, Oliff J, Keighley MRB (1993) The prevalence of anal sphincter defects in faecal incontinence: a prospective endosonic study. Gut 34: 685 – 8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard F. Labasky

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations