Skip to main content
  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

The role of laparoscopic surgery is to be a substitute for abdominal surgery without creating new indications when using this new technique. It is therefore not possible to discuss laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) without commenting on the ongoing discussion about benefits and hazards of preserving the cervix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Virtanen H (1994) Sequelae of operations related to uterine removal. Thesis, Turku University, Turku

    Google Scholar 

  2. The hospital discharge registry (1996) Centre for Epidemiology, Swedish Medical Board, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wessey M, Villard-Mackintosh L, McPherson K et al (1992) The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 99: 402–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sills E, Saini J, Applegate M et al (1998) Supracervical and total abdominal hysterectomy trends in New York State: 1990–1996. J Urban Health 75:903–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Masters W, Johnson V (1966) Human sexual response. Little, Brown and Co, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hasson H (1993) Cervical removal at hysterectomy for benign disease. Risks and benefits. J Reprod Med 38:781–789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilkku P (1983) Supravaginal uterine amputation vs hysterectomy. Effects on libido and orgasm. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 62:147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eicher W (1994) Totale und subtotale Hysterektomie. Arch Gynecol Obstet 255:S359-S366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexander A, Naji A, Pinion S et al (1996) Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy with endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: psychiatric and psychosocial aspects. BMJ 312:280–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Crosignani P, Vercellini P, Apolone G et al (1997) Endometrial resection versus vaginal hysterectomy for menorrhagia: long-term clinical and quality of life outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:95–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strauss B, Jakel I, Koch-Dorfler M et al (1996) Psychiatric and sexual sequelae of hysterectomy - a comparison of different surgical methods. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 56:473–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Helstrom L, Sorbom D, Backstrom T (1995) Influence of partner relationship on sexuality after subtotal hysterectomy. Acta Scand Obstet Gynecol 74:142–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Parys B, Haylen B, Hutton J et al (1989) The effect of simple hysterectomy on vesicourethral function. Br J Urol 64:594–599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Virtanen H, Makinen J, Tenho T et al (1993) Effects of abdominal hysterectomy on urinary and sexual symptoms. Br J Urol 72:868–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kilkku P (1985) Supravaginal uterine amputation versus hysterectomy with reference to subjective bladder symptoms and incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 64:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lalos O, Bjerle P (1985) Early and late effects of subtotal and total hysterectomy on bladder function. Arch Gynecol 237:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bhattacharya S, Mollison J, Pinion S et al (1996) A comparison of bladder and ovarian function two years following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:898–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Virtanen H, Makinen J (1993) Retrospective analysis of 711 patients operated on for pelvic relaxation in 1983–1989. Int J Gynecol Obstet 42:109–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilkku P, Gronroos M (1982) Preoperative electrocoagulation of the endocervical mucosa and later carcinoma of the cervical stump. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 62:265–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Storm H, Clemmensen I, Manders T et al (1992) Supravaginal uterine amputation in Denmark 1978–1988 and risk of cancer. Gynecol Oncol 45:198–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Stege J, van Beek J (1999) Problems related to the cervical stump at follow-up in laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS 3:335–336

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ewen S, Sutton C (1995) Advantages of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet Gynaecol 4:707–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Garry R, Shelley-Jones D, Mooney P et al (1995) Six hundred endometrial laser ablations. Obstet Gynecol 85:24–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nathorst Boos J, Fuchs T, von Schoultz B (1992) Consumer’s attitude to hysterectomy. The experience of 678 women. Acta Gynecol Scand 71:230–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Munro M, Parker W (1993) A classification system for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 82:624–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Semm K (1991) Hysterektomie per laparotomiam der per pelviskopiam ohne Kolpotomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 51:996–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pelosi M, Pelosi M 3d (1992) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med 37:777–784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyons T (1993) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. A comparison of morbidity and mortality results with laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 38:763–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz R (1994) Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Supracervical vs assisted vaginal. J Reprod Med 39:625–630.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richards S, Simpkins S (1995) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Ass Gynecol Laparosc 2:431–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lalonde C, Daniell J (1995) Early outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Am Gynecol Laparosc 2:S24-S28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mettler L, Semm K (1997) Subtotal versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dong HK, Do H, Min H et al (1998) Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Gynecol Laparosc 5:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Milad M, Morrison K, Sokol A et al (2001) A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 15:286–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hefni M, El-Toukhy T (2000) Vaginal subtotal hysterectomy and sacrospinous colpopexy: an option in the management of uterine prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:494–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Olsson JH, Ellström M, Hahlin M (1996) A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ellström M, Bengtsson A, Tylman M et al (1996) Evaluation of tissue trauma after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: measurements of neutrophil activation and release of interleukin-6 Cortisol and C-reactive protein. J Am Coll Surg 182:423–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ellström M, Fagevik Olsen M, Olsson JH et al (1998) Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol 77:923–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ellström M, Ferraz-Nunez J, Olsson JH et al (1998) A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 91:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Härkki Siren P, Sjöberg J, Tiitinen A (1998) Urinary tract injuries after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 92:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ellström, M. (2003). Laparoscopic Subtotal Hysterectomy. In: Ultrasound and Endoscopic Surgery in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0655-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1170-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0655-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics