The Disputed Death

Abstract

Rational people wish to die in their own bed, in the bosom of their devoted family, of a short and painless but necessarily severe illness supervised by a kindly and efficient physician who accurately certifies the cause of death to the satisfaction of all concerned.

Keywords

Dust Cocaine Hull Adrenalin Bark 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Picknett N, Prince C, Prior S. Double standards: The Rudolf Hess cover-up. London: Time Warner Paperbacks, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas G, Dillon M. The assassination of Robert Maxwell: Israel’ s superspy. London: Robson Books, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lock M. Twice dead: Organ transplants and the reinvention of death. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gray C. Book: Twice dead: organ transplants and the reinvention of death. (Book review). BMJ 2002;324:1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beevor A. Berlin: The downfall 1945. London: Viking, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conyers Nesbit R. Missing believed killed. Stroud: Sutton Publishing Ltd, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rutty GN (Ed.) Essentials of autopsy practice, vol 1. London: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Domes CP. Coroner’s courts: a guide to law and practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry PJ. Intra-alveolar haemorrhage in sudden infant death syndrome: a cause for concern? (Editorial). J Clin Pathol 1999;52:553–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Green MA. A practical approach to suspicious death in infancy - a personal view. J Clin Pathol 1999;51:561–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Walters TC, O’Connell MA. A Guide to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. London: Financial Training Publications, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    www.doj.gov.za/trc/ (cited 2002).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Conot RE. Justice at Nuremberg. New York: Harper and Row, 1983.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Report into the Royal Liverpool Children’s Hospital. London: Department of Health, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Report of a census of organs and tissues retained by pathology services in England. London: Department of Health, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anatomy Act, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Human Tissue Act, 1961.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Retained Organs Commission. Annual Report April 2001 -March 2002. London: The Commission, 2002.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Furness PN. Useful things you cannot do with “surgical waste”. Acp News 2001; Spring: 24–26.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holzel T, Salkeld A. The mystery of Mallory & Irvine. Fully revised edition. London: Pimlico, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Preston D. A first-rate tragedy: Captain Scott’s Antarctic expeditions. London: Constable, 1997.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Solomon S. The Coldest March: Scott’s fatal Antarctic expedition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Belsey A. Journalism and ethics: can they co-exist? In: Kieran M, editor. Media Ethics. London: Routledge, 1998;1–14.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aquino T. Essential evidence. 2nd ed. London: Cavendish Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gee DJ, Mason JK. The law of evidence. In: The courts and the doctor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990;63.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gee DJ, Mason JK. The courts and the doctor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dorries CP. Appendix 5: Coroner’s Rules 1984. In: Coroner’s courts: a guide to law and practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999;327–60.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dorries CP. No definitive list of verdicts. In: Coroner’s courts: a guide to law and practice. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 1999;200–1.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Knight B. The Coroner’s Autopsy: a guide to non-criminal autopsies for the general pathologist. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gee DJ, Mason JK. Failure of the expert witness. In: The courts and the doctor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990;143–59.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aquino T. Burden and standard of proof. In: Essential evidence. 2nd ed. London: Cavendish Publishing, 2000;1–12.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aquino T. The rule against hearsay. In: Essential evidence. 2nd ed. London: Cavendish Publishing, 2000;99–109.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kennedy L. Thirty-six murders and two immoral earnings. London: Profile Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gray

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations