The Impact of Interorganizational Networks on Buyer-Seller Relationships

  • Charles Steinfield
  • Robert Kraut
  • Alice Chan
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)

Abstract

During the past decade, organizational theorists, business consultants, and telecommunications managers and vendors have directed our attention to the strategic role that information can play in the competitive strategy of firms (see, for example, Bradley, Hausman and Nolan, 1993; Keen, 1988; Porter and Millar 1985). Throughout the 1980s, widely discussed case examples demonstrated how the use of telecommunications networks to link firms to their suppliers and distribution chains conveyed important first mover advantages to such firms as American Hospital Supply and McKesson. The reported benefits to the firms deploying such interorganizational networks included: increased efficiency of order processing; reduced costs due to just-in-time inventory management; locking in trading partners because of the difficulties competitors faced once a network was in place; and greater ability to customize products and services based upon information arising from the transactions carried by the network (Cash and Konsynski, 1985; Johnson and Vitale, 1988).

Keywords

Europe Petroleum Income Marketing Explosive 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakos, J. Y. and Brynjolffson, E.: 1992. When quality matters: Information technology and buyer-supplier relationships, Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Irvine, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Bradley, S., Hausman, J. and Nolan, R. (eds): 1993, Globalization, Technology and Competition: The Fusion of Computers and Telecommunications in the 1990s, Harvard University School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Brousseau, E.: 1990, Information technologies and inter-firm relationships: The spread of interorganizational telematics systems and its impact on economic structure, Presented to the International Telecommunications Society, Venice, June.Google Scholar
  4. Brynjolffson, E., Malone, T., Gurbaxani, V. and Kambil, A.: 1993, Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Business Week: 1994, The Internet: How it will change the way you do businessBusiness Week, November 14, 80–88.Google Scholar
  6. Cash, J. I. and Konsynski, B. R.: 1985, IS redraws competitive boundaries, Harvard Business Review, March-April, 134–142.Google Scholar
  7. France Telecom: 1992, Minitel Strategy, Author, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Granovetter, M.: 1985, Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, P. and Estrin, D.: 1991, Interorganizational networks, computer integration, and shifts in interdependence: The case of the semiconductor industry, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9(4), 370–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnston, H. R. and Vitale, M. R.: 1988, Creating competitive advantage with interorganizational information systems, MIS Quarterly,153–165.Google Scholar
  11. Johnston, R. and Lawrence, P.: 1988, Beyond vertical integration: The rise of the value-adding partnership, Harvard Business Review, July-August, 94–101.Google Scholar
  12. Kambil, A.: 1991, Information technology and vertical integration: Evidence from the manufacturing sector, in M. Guerin-Calvert and S. Wildman (eds), Electronic Services Networks: A Business and Public Policy Challenge,Praeger, NY, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
  13. Keen, P.: 1988, Competing in Time: Using Telecommunications for Competitive Advantage, Ballinger Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Kekre, S. and Mudhopadhyay, T.: 1992, Impact of electronic data interchange technology on quality improvement and inventory reduction programs: A field study, International Journal of Production Economics,28, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lucas, H., Levecq, H., Kraut, R. and Streeter, L.: 1995, France’s grass-roots data net, IEEE Spectrum, November, 71–77.Google Scholar
  16. Malone, T.: 1987, Modeling coordination in organizations and markets, Managementn Science, 33, 1317–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malone, T., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R.: 1987, Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies: effects of information technology on market structure and corporate strategies, Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malone, T., Yates, J. and Benjamin, R.: 1989, The logic of electronic markets, Harvard Business Review, May-June, 166–171.Google Scholar
  19. Mansell, R. and Jenkins, M.: 1992, Electronic trading networks: EDI and beyond, Conference Proceedings, IDATE 91, Montpellier, France, November.Google Scholar
  20. Moch, M. and Morse, E.: 1977, Size, centralization and organizational adoption of innovations, American Sociological Review, 42, 716–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Porter, M. E. and Millar, V. E.: 1985, How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 149–160.Google Scholar
  22. Porter, M. E.: 1980, Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Powell, W.: 1990, Neither market nor hierarchy: Networked forms of organization, in B. Staw and L.. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
  24. Salton, G. and McGill, M. J.: 1979, Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, NY.Google Scholar
  25. Sarkar, M. B., Butler, B. and Steinfield, C.: 1995, Intermediaries and cybermediaries: A continuing role for mediating players in the electronic marketplace, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 1(3): http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/
  26. Steinfield, C. and Caby, L.: 1993, Strategic organizational applications of videotex among varying network configurations, Telematics and Informatics, 10(2), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Steinfield, C., Caby, L. and Vialle, P.: 1992, Exploring the role of videotex in the international strategy of the firm, Paper presented to the Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Solomons Island, Md, September.Google Scholar
  28. Streeter, L. A., Kraut, R. E., Lucas, H. C. and Caby, L.: 1996, How open data networks influence business performance and market structure, Communications of the ACM, 39, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weber, J.: 1995, Just get it to the stores on time, Business Week, March 6, 66–67Google Scholar
  30. Wildman, S. and Guerin-Calvert, M.: 1991, Electronic services networks: Functions, structures, and public policy, in M. Guerin-Calvert and S. Wildman (eds), Electronic Services Networks: A Business and Public Policy Challenge, Praeger, NY, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, O.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, Free Press, NY.Google Scholar
  32. Zucker, L.: 1986, Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure: 1840–1920, in B. Staw and L. Cummings (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior,Vol. 8, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 53–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Steinfield
    • 1
  • Robert Kraut
    • 2
  • Alice Chan
    • 3
  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Carnegie Mellon UniversityCarnegieUSA
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityCornellUSA

Personalised recommendations