Abstract
We learn numbers and counting as a process of succession. ‘Eleven’ has little real meaning to us except as ‘the number after ten’. In this chapter, we use this process of succession to define the natural numbers - to do God’s work, in Kronecker’s phrase - starting from nothing (more precisely, the empty set) and progressing from one number to the next. As succession is the defining characteristic of natural numbers, so induction is the key proof technique. We can use it to define the arithmetic operations and to prove their basic properties.
We have learned to pass with such facility from cardinal to ordinal number that the two aspects appear to us as one. To determine the plurality of a collection, that is, its cardinal number, we do not bother anymore to find a model collection with which we can match it - we count it... The operations of arithmetic are based on the tacit assumption that we can always pass from any number to its successor, and this is the essence of the ordinal concept.
And so matching by itself is incapable of creating an art of reckoning. Without our ability to arrange things in ordered succession little progress could have been made. Correspondence and succession... are woven into the very fabric of our number system.
Tobias Dantzig, Number: The Language of Science [12]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cameron, P.J. (1998). Ordinal numbers. In: Sets, Logic and Categories. Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0589-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0589-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-056-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0589-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive