Patterns of development

  • Michael Bronzite


The review of available data in Chapter 2 established an average failure rate for software system development at about 85%. This was based on figures generated over the last decade from a variety of sources.


Structure Framework Local Council British Library London Stock Exchange Private Finance Initiative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hall P, Great Planning Disasters, Penguin Books, 1981, p.170Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herbert S, Things are not looking up at the library, The Daily Telegraph, 4.11.94, p. 22Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blackhurst C, British Library ‘will be 10 years overdue’, The Independent, 27.11.95, p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, Progress in Completing the New British Library, HC 362 1995/96, 15.5.96Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bar-Hillel M, Reading between the lines, it’s a disaster, The Evening Standard, 13.10.97, p.14Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hewitt V, MPs sound alarm on project’s £1.2 bn bill, Computing, 1.12.88. p.1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Collins T, DSS system costs rise as staff snub Moore, Computing Weekly, 6.7.89, p.1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MP slates DSS systems failure, Computing, 20.6.91, p.9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kelsey T, £2.6 bn DSS computer ‘failure’, The Independent, 9.9.94, p.1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffiths C and Willcocks L, Are major information technology projects worth the risk?, p.9, (see under Documents) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins T, £2.6 bn DSS system fails to hit targets, Computer Weekly, 28.3.96, p.1Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Collins T and Bicknell D, Crash, p.128, (see under Bibliography)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelsey T, Flawed DSS computer system could cost £50m, The Independent, 8.7.94, p.1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moules J, DSS sues ICL over failed benefit analysis software, Computing, 25.5.95, p.3Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walker P, ‘No blame’ in ICL Assist dispute, Computing, 19.6.97, p.6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collins T, DSS setback stings Andersen for £25m, Computer Weekly, 2.5.96, p.1Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, The Contract to Develop and Operate the Replacement National Insurance Recording System, HC Session 1997–98, 29.5.98Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ITSA denies Nirs liability, Computing, 29.4.99, p.2Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nissé J, Andersen criticised over computer chaos, The London Times, 10.7.99, p.23Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holmes D, MoD rejects Chots flak, Datalink, 9.5.88, p.6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Read M, MoD office project hits trouble as BT pulls out, Computing, 7.2.91, p.1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evans J, MoD’s IT gaffes prompt rap from watchdog MPs, Computing, 27.2.92, p.4Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Collins T, MoD plans ‘out-of-date’ £14 m upgrade to Chots, Computer Weekly, 21.9.95, p.1Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    MoD confirms NT in ailing Chots project, Computing, 5.9.96, p.3Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fagan M, Brokers ‘wasted £100m on systems’, The Independent, 14.7.92, p.23Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bicknell D, City IT costs out of control, says survey, Computer Weekly, 4.1.96, p.3Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Griffiths C and Willcocks L, Are major information technology projects worth the risk? p.16, (see under Documents)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    International Stock Exchange: TAURUS Project, website:
  29. 29.
    The Spectacular Collapse of the London Stock Exchange Project, MBA 832 Mini Case Studies,
  30. 30.
    Hayward D, London Ambulance places dispatch system on sick list, Computing, 2.4.92, p.2Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jones J, Ambulance delays are blamed on staff errors, The Independent, 20.4.92, p.5Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Randell B, London Ambulance Service Inquiry Report, The Risks Digest,Vol. 14, Issue 48, 7.4.93, p.2Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Charette R, No One Could Have Done Better, American Programmer, July 1995, p.21Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glass R, Software Runaways, (see under Bibliography) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    New Denver Airport: Impact of the Delayed Baggage System, Briefing Report, 10/14/94. GAO/RCED-95–35BRGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Glass R, Software Runaways, p.35, (see under Bibliography) Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Collins T and Bicknell D, Crash, p.221, (see under Bibliography) Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    US auditor counts cost of transport unit fiasco. US Bureau, Computer Weekly,1.9.94, p.3Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Carey J, 2002, A Space Odyssey — or just a Pork Pie in the Sky, Business Week, 15.8.94, p.47Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration — 1999 Report, Inspector General:

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bronzite

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations