• Michael Bronzite


It has been a long journey, but this is where we can pull all the logical threads together that have been spun out in the preceding pages. The following two sections of the chapter will take a look back through the book to highlight the main points that have been covered in the past 200 odd pages. The fourth section will address one of the more serious questions still unanswered by the system development industry — the question of system utility. And, as a grand finale, we shall then explore some of the more intriguing strategic possibilities that could be applied in some future evolution of system development.


System Development Balance Scorecard Strategic Framework Corporate Benefit System Development Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    UK’s NAO report highlights defence projects delays, costs overruns,
  2. 2.
    Lewis M, Fuddled by the figures, Computer Weekly, 5.8.1999, p.20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riley J, Proving IT’s worth, Computer Weekly, 25.2.1999, p.18Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harrington T, Total cost of ownership — the search goes on to locate IT’s holy grail, Computing, 24.6.1999, p.26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan R and Norton D, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, 1996Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balanced Business Scorecard, http://metabpr.cont/bbs.htm
  7. 7.
    Pringle D, Measure for Measure, Information Strategy, September 1998, p.28Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meredith S, Measuring IT’s vital statistics, Computing, 27.5.1999, p.32Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goodwin C, Taking the measure of ARM’s method, Computing, 29.7.1999, p.22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harvey D, What’s in it for the business?, Computer Weekly, 5.10.1989, p.22Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Can IT count on the bottom line?, Computer Weekly, 10.12.1998, p.57Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Researchers blow myth of competitive advantage, Computing, 1.11.1990, p.4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Landauer T, The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity, MIT Press, 1966Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bicknell D, Computers ‘hinder productivity’, Computer Weekly, 29.6.1995, p.2Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sabbagh D, Bankers count the cost, Computing, 16.10.97, p.1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strassmann P, Will big spending on computers guarantee profitability?, Datamation,
  17. 17.
    McAteer J, Measuring the return on Information Technology, p.2, SRI International Business Intelligence Program D95–1964, Nov. 1995Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orlikowski W, and Hofman J, An Improvisational Model of Change Management, Sloan Management Review, Winter 1997Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pringle G, Information Strategy, Dec 1998/Jan 1999, p.26Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crook C, Strategic Planning in the Contemporary World, American Programmer, March 1996, p.9Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGrath R and MacMillan I, Discovery Driven Planning, Harvard Business Review, July-August 1995, p.44Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stacey R, Dynamic Strategic Management for the 1990s, (see under Bibliography) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Christensen C, The Innovator’s Dilemma, (see under Bibliography) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bronzite

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations