Abstract
If organisations can be said to thrive and become more innovative when pushed far from equilibrium [5, 7], then business process re-engineering (BPR) may be seen as a means of creating these conditions. However, BPR often disregards the consequences of massive disruption in connectivity and tends to restrict emergence and self-organisation. The new engineered or designed structure may provide a new framework, but it does not encourage exploration, learning and evolution. Neither does it support divergence and variety, which are essential elements in enabling the emergence of new behaviours and ways of working. BPR, by relying on designing and controlling both the process and the outcome, blocks emergence and thus disables one of its key objectives: the creation of a new way of working.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kauffman, S. The Origins of Order: Self-Organisation and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, 1993.
Kauffman, S. At Home in the Universe Viking, 1995.
Holland, J. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
Holland, J. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
Prigogine, I. and Stengers, I. Order Out of Chaos. Flamingo, 1985.
Prigogine, I. Time and the problem of the two cultures. In First International Dialogue on the Transition to Global Society, Landegg Academy, 3–9 September 1990.
Nicolis, G. and Prigogine I. Exploring Complexity. W.H. Freeman, 1989.
Nicolis, G. Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organisation. Ch.11 in The New Physics, Davies, P. (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 1989 (reprinted 1994).
Allen, P.M. Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Model of Complexity. Environmental Problems and Social Dynamics Series, Vol. 1. Gordon & Breach, 1997.
Goodwin, B. How the Leopard Changed its Spots. Phoenix, 1995.
Webster, G. and Goodwin, B. Form and Transformation: Generative and Relational Principles in Biology. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Arthur, B.W. Positive Feedbacks in the Economy. Scientific American, February 1990.
Arthur, B.W. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Michigan, 1995.
Hodgson, G.M. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. PolityPress, 1993.
Parker, D. and Stacey, R.D. Chaos, Management and Economics: The Implications of Non-Linear Thinking. Hobart Paper 125, Institute of Economic Affairs, 1994.
Stacey, R.D. The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(6), 477–495.
Stacey, R.D. Complexity and Creativity in Organizations. Berrett-Koehler, 1996.
Parker, D. Nonlinear Dynamics and Organisational Adaptability. Research paper, April 1995.
Lane, D.A. and Maxfield, R. Foresight, complexity and strategy. In The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II: Proceedings, Arthur, B.W., Durlauf, S. and Lane, D.A. (eds). Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Vol. 27, 1997.
McMaster, M. The Intelligence Advantage: Organizing for Complexity. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996.
Gell-Mann, M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. W.H. Freeman, 1994.
Gell-Mann, M. Complexity J., 1995/96, 1(5).
Goodwin, B. LSE Strategy and complexity seminar, on 23/4/97, report on http://www.lse.ac.uk/lse/complex
Checkland, P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Wiley, 1981.
Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, 1990.
Varela, F. Paper given at the Complexity and Strategy Conference, London, May 1995.
Varela, F. and Maturana, H. The Tree of Knowledge. Shambhala, 1992.
Ashby, W.R. Self-regulation and requisite Variety. in Systems Thinking, Emery, F.E. (ed.). Penguin, 1969.
Kauffman, S. and Macready, W. Technological evolution and adaptive organizations. Complexity J., 1995, 1(2), 26–43.
Kauffman, S. Complexity and Technology Conference, London, 11 March 1997.
Maturana, H. Workshop at the Open University, March 1997.
Oliver, D. and Roos, J. The poised organisation: navigating effectively on knowledge landscapes. Paper presented at the Strategy and Complexity Seminar, London School of Economics, 13 February 1997 and on http://www.imd.ch/fac/roos/paper_po.html
Axelrod, R. The Evolution of Cooperation. Penguin, 1990.
Bovaird, T. and Sharifi, S. Partnerships and networks as selforganising systems: a case study of rural action for the environment. Research paper, September 1995.
Espejo, R. and Harnden R. The Viable Systems Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer’s VSM. Wiley, 1992.
Gleick, J. Chaos. Heinemann, 1987 (reprinted 1990).
Lewin, R. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. Macmillan, 1993.
Luhman, N. Essays on Self Reference. Columbia, 1990.
Peak, D. and Frame, M. Chaos under Control: The Art and Science of Complexity. W.H. Freeman, 1994.
Segel, L. Grappling with complexity. Complexity J., 1995, 1(2).
Waldrop, M.M. Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. Penguin, 1992.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2000). Complexity: Partial Support for BPR?. In: Henderson, P. (eds) Systems Engineering for Business Process Change. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0457-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1146-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0457-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive