An Internet-based Approach to the Capture and Reuse of Knowledge in Design

  • Paul A. Rodgers
  • Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
  • Avon P. Huxor

Abstract

Designers in modern design settings are confronted with several pressures. They are faced with increasing demands to reduce development costs, shorten time to market periods and at the same time improve the total quality of the product which inevitably leads to an increase in the complexity of design projects. In an effort to meet these pressures, and others, designers now rely upon vast quantities of knowledge to support their design tasks. This knowledge must be in a format that the designer can locate, access, use and re-use easily. To this end, this paper describes a practical approach that facilitates methods for capturing, storing, applying and re-using knowledge in design activities. The approach taken is based on an “AI as writing” metaphor which has been implemented in an Internet-based “knowledge server” architecture. The implementation, WebCADET, provides effective mechanisms for capturing, using and re-using knowledge in modern conceptual design tasks.

Keywords

Assimilation Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    MacLeod, A., McGregor, D.R. and Hutton, G.H., 1994, “Accessing of information for engineering design”, Design Studies, 15(3), pp. 260–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Court, A.W., Culley, S.J. and McMAHON, C.A., 1997, “The influence of information technology in new product development: Observations of an empirical study of the access of engineering design information”, International Journal of Information Management, 17(5), pp. 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ertas, A. and Jones, J.C., 1993, The Engineering Design Process. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Pugh, S., 1991, Total Design. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Lincoln, J.R., Ahmadjian, C.L. and Mason, E., 1998 “Organizational learning and purchase-supply relationships in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota compared”, California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P., 1998, “Organizing knowledge”, California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Court, A.W., 1995, The modelling and classification of information for engineering designers. PhD Thesis, University of Bath, UK.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Boston, O.P., Culley, S.J. and McMahon, C.A., 1996, “Designers and suppliers — modelling the flow of information”, Proceedings of ILCE’96, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Marsh, J.R., 1997, The capture and structure of design experience. PhD Thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department, UK.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hamilton, J., Clarkson, P.J. and Burgess, S., 1997, “The modelling of design knowledge for computer supported aerospace design”, Proceedings, 11th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’97), Tampere, Finland, 1, pp. 235–240.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Frank, D., 1999, “The importance of knowledge management for BMW”, Proceedings 12th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’99), Munich, Germany, 1, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., 1991, The Knowledge Creating Company: How Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Polanyi, M, 1974, Personal Knowledge Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Roozenburg, N.F.M. and Eekels, J., 1995, Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Johnson, P., 1992, Human Computer Interaction. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Garnham, A. and Oakhill, J., 1994 Thinking and Reasoning. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Boy, G., 1991, Intelligent Assistant Systems. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Stauffer, L.A. and Ullman, D.G., 1988, “A comparison of the results of the empirical studies into the mechanical design process”, Design Studies, 9(2), pp. 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sanvido, V.E., Kumara, S. and Ham, I., 1989, “A top-down approach to integrating the building process”, Engineering with Computers, (5), pp. 89–103.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Wood, W.H., Yang, M.C., Cutkosky, M.R., Agogino, A.M., 1998, “Design information retrieval: Improving access to the informal side of design”, CD-ROM Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC’98), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Rodgers, P.A., Patterson, A.C. and Wilson, D.R., 1993, “A computer-aided evaluation system for assessing design concepts”, Manufacturing Intelligence, (15), pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Coyne, R.D., Rosenman, M.A., Radford, A.D., Balachandran, M. and Gero, J.S., 1990, Knowledge-Based Design Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Cross, N., 1994, Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Allen, L., 1986, “The cost of an expert”, Computerworld, July 21, pp. 59–68.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ong, W. J., 1986, “Writing is a technology that restructures thought”, In G. Baumann (Ed.), The Written Word: Literacy in Transition. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Hill, W.C., 1989, “The mind at AI: Horseless carriage to clock”, AI Magazine, (9), pp. 29–41.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Fischer, G. and Nakakoji, K., 1992, “Beyond the macho approach of artificial intelligence: Empower human designers — do not replace them”, Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), pp. 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Wood, W.H. and Agogino, A. M, 1996, “Case-based conceptual design information server for concurrent engineering”, Computer-Aided Design, 28(5), pp. 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P., 1996, The social life of documents, First Monday, 1(1).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Hoft, K. and Ito, Y., 1999, “A method for culture — and mindset-harmonised design”, Proceedings, 12th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’99), Munich, Germany, 1, pp. 313–316.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Sinding-Larsen, H., 1988, “Information technology and the extemalisation of knowledge”, In H. Sinding-Larsen (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence and Language: Old Questions in a New Key. Tano, Oslo, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Eriksson, H., 1996, Expert systems as knowledge servers, IEEE Expert, 11(3), pp. 14–19.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Liu, J. and Brown, D.C., 1994, “Generating design decomposition knowledge for parametric design problems”, In J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘94. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 661–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Dym, C.L., 1994, Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Leake, D.B., Birnbaum, L., Hammond, K., Marlow, C. and Yang, H., 1999, “Integrating information resources: A case study of engineering design support”, Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR-99), Springer-Verlag, Berlin (in press).Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Brown, D.C. and Grecu, D.L., 1997, “An ‘AI in design’ view of design”, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Computer Science Dept. Technical Report, WPI-CS-TR-97–12Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Lee, J., 1997, “Design rationale systems: Understanding the issues”, IEEE Expert, 12(3), pp. 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Kobayashi, S., 1990, Colour Image Scale. Kodansha International, London.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    Rodgers, P.A., Blessing, L.T.M., Caldwell, N.H.M., Huxor, A.P., 1999, “Exploring the effectiveness of network-based tools in distributed conceptual design activity”, In N.P. Juster (Ed.), The Continuum of Design Education. Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd., London, pp. 151–161.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Rodgers, P.A., Caldwell, N.H.M, Clarkson, P.J., Huxor, A.P., 2000, “Managing knowledge in dispersed design companies”, In J.S. Gero (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘2000. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Rodgers
    • 1
  • Nicholas H.M. Caldwell
    • 2
  • Avon P. Huxor
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of DesignNapier UniversityEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Engineering Design CentreUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Centre for Electronic ArtsMiddlesex UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations