Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Neural Computing ((PERSPECT.NEURAL))

Abstract

Several theories of action selection assume that the environment both suggests and constrains possible actions at each moment. We present an interactive activation model (based on an existing model of routine sequential action selection) in which actions are organised into partially ordered schemas for simple task elements, and the current state of the environment contributes to selecting actions and schemas. Previous versions of the model have not accounted for learning. We show that a simple reinforcement learning paradigm allows environment-action associations to be acquired through unguided exploration of the environment. The basic model is limited in the types of environment/action associations that it acquires. We explore ways in which greater diversity of learning (and behaviour) may be achieved, and suggest that, in order to acquire a broad range of environment/action associations, mechanisms for boredom avoidance or novelty seeking are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cooper, R., & Fox, J. (1998). COGENT: A visual design environment for cognitive modeling. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 30, 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, R., & Shallice, T. (2000).Contention Scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, R., Shallice, T., & Farringdon, J. (1995). Symbolic and continuous processes in the automatic selection of actions. In Hallam, J. (Ed.), Hybrid Problems, Hybrid Solutions, pp. 27–37. IOS Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Miftin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glasspool, D. W. (1998). Modelling Serial Order in Behaviour: Studies of Spelling. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Psychology, University College, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In Dale, R., Mellish, C., & Zock, M. (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation, chap. 11, pp. 287–319. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lhermitte, F. (1983). Utilisation behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain,106, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maes, P. (1989). How to do the right thing. Connection Science, 1, 291–323.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. Chip report 99, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In Davidson, R., Schwartz, G., & Shapiro, D. (Eds.), Consciousness and Self Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory, Volume 4, pp. 1–18. Plenum, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Plaut, D. c., & Shallice, T. (1993). Perseverative and semantic inftuences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 5, 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reason, J. T. (1984). Lapses of attention in everyday life. In Parasuraman, W., & Davies, R. (Eds.), Varieties of Attention, chap. 14, pp. 515–549. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs, 2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cooper, R., Glasspool, D. (2001). Learning Action Affordances and Action Schemas. In: French, R.M., Sougné, J.P. (eds) Connectionist Models of Learning, Development and Evolution. Perspectives in Neural Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0281-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-354-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0281-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics