Advertisement

Online Communities: Usability, Sociabilty, Theory and Methods

  • Jenny Preece

Abstract

Internet usage doubles every 52 days. Over 18 million people are AOL subscribers - many of whom are attracted by AOL’s emphasis on email, chats, instant messaging and, of course, the Web. Active Worlds, a graphical chat environment, has over a million participants. During the first quarter of 1998, 450 000 messages were posted to 20 000 Usenet groups. The number of people coming online continues to increase as e-commerce, online education, online health, and increasing amounts of information and people with whom to chat entice even more people. Meanwhile, according to Moore’s Law computing power doubles every 18 months. For the well educated, with jobs and Internet stock, the future looks bright. However, the gap continues to broaden between low and high income, and between poorly and well-educated people. There are fears that socializing face-to-face will decline leading to an unprecedented number of lonely, psychologically impoverished people. Better access to successful online communities for all citizens could reduce isolation and improve quality of life for all citizens.

Keywords

Online Community Universal Access Social Presence Communication Task Revealing Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, M, and Starr, B (1996) Social activity indicators for groupware.IEEE Computer29(6), 37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R (1984)The Evolution of Cooperation.New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J, van Dam, A, Earnshaw, R, Encarnacao, J, Guedj, R, Preece, J, Shneiderman, B and Vince, J (1999a) Human-centered computing, online communities and virtual environments, IEEE Computer Graphics, 19(6), 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J, van Dam, A, Earnshaw, R, Encarnacao, J, Guedj, R, Preece, J, Shneiderman, B and Vince, J (1999b) Human-centered computing, online communities and virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Interactions, 6(5).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J, van Dam, A, Earnshaw, R, Encarnacao, J, Guedj, R, Preece, J, Shneiderman, B and Vince, J (1999c) Special report on human-centered computing, online communities and virtual environments.ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics33(3), 42–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Card, S (1991) Presentation on the Theories of HCI at the NSF Workshop on Human Computer Interaction, Washington, DC, National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, HH and Brennan, SE (1993) Grounding in communication, in Groupware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ed. RM Baecker), San Francisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 222–233.Google Scholar
  8. Daft, RL and Lengel, RH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural designManagement Science32, 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Figallo, C (1998)Hosting Web Communities.New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Fukuyama, F (1995)TrustNew York, Free Press Paperbacks, Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Gaines, BR, Chen, L-JL and Shaw, MLG (1997) Modeling the Human factors of scholarly communities supported through the Internet and the World WideWeb, Journal of the American Society oflnformation Science48(11), 987–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garton, L, Haythornthwaite, C, and Wellman, B (1999) Studying online social networks, in S Jones (ed.), Doing Internet Research (pp. 75–105), London, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Hackos, J, and Redish, JC (1998)User Analysis and Task Analysis for Interface DesignNew York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  14. Haythornthwaite, C (1996) Media use in support of communication networks in an academic research environment, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, SE (1999)Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the NetThousand Oaks, Sage.Google Scholar
  16. King, S (1994) Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century (IPCT), 2(3), 47–56.Google Scholar
  17. Kling, R (1999) What is social informatics and why does it matter?D-Lib Magazine5(1).Google Scholar
  18. Kollock, P (1998) Design principles in online communitiesPC Update15, 58–60.Google Scholar
  19. Lazar, J, and Preece, J (1999) Designing and implementing Web-based surveys, Journal of Computer Information Systems, xxxix(4), 63–67.Google Scholar
  20. Levenson, RW, and Ruef, AM (1992) Empathy: a physiological substrate, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liebowitz, JE (1999)Knowledge Management HandbookBoca Raton, FL, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lynch, PJ, and Horton, S (1999)Web Style Guide (Preliminary Version)New Haven and London, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Markus, ML (1987) Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependence and diffusionCommunication Research14, 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Markus, ML (1990) Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependence and diffusion. InOrganizations and Communication Technology(eds. J Fulk and C Steinfeld), Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 194–218.Google Scholar
  25. Morris, M, and Ogan, C (1996) The Internet as mass mediumJournal of Communication46(1).Google Scholar
  26. National Telecommunications and Information Administration & Commerce (1999)Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital DivideWashington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Nielsen, J and Mack, RL (1994)Usability Inspection MethodsNew York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  28. Nonnecke, B, and Preece, J (2000) Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In press: available from the authors.Google Scholar
  29. Norman, DA (1986) Cognitive engineering, in User-Centered Systems Design (eds. D Norman and S Draper), Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Olson, GM, and Olson, JS (1997) Research on computer supported cooperative work, inHandbook of Human Computer Interaction2nd edn (eds. M Helander, TK Landauer and P Prabhu), Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp. 1433–1456.Google Scholar
  31. Preece, J (1998) Empathic communities: reaching out across the WebInteractions Magazine2(2), 32–43.Google Scholar
  32. Preece, J (1999a) Empathic Communities: balancing emotional and factual communication, Interacting with Computers, 12, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preece, J (1999b) A research agenda for online communities: Understanding behavior, predicting outcomes and informing design. Bonas, France, EC and NSF Workshop.Google Scholar
  34. Preece, J (2000) Thriving Online Communities: Usability and Sociability, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  35. Preece, J, Rogers, Y, Sharp, H, Benyon, D, Holland, S, and Carrey, T (1994) Human-Computer Interaction, Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  36. Rice, RE (1987) Computer mediated communication and organizational innovations, Journal of Communication, 37, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rice, R (1993) Media appropriateness. Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizationalmedia, Human Communication Research19(4), 451–484.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rice, R (1994) Network analysis and computer-mediated communication systems, in Advances in Social Network Analysis (ed. SWJ Galaskiewkz), Newbury Park, CA, Sage, pp. 167–203).Google Scholar
  39. Schuler, D (1996)New Community Networks: Wired for ChangeReading, MA, ACM Press and Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  40. Shneiderman, B (1999) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-computer Interaction, 3rd edn, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  41. Short, J, Williams, E, and Christie, B (1976)The Social Psychology of TelecommunicationsLondon, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, MA (1999) Invisible crowds in cyberspace: mapping the social structure of the Internet, inCommunities in Cyberspace(ed. MASP Kollock), London, Routledge, pp. 195–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spool, JM, Scanlon, T, Schroeder, W, Snyder, C, and DeAngelo, T (1997)Web Site Usability: A Designer’s GuideNorth Andover, MA, User Interface Engineering.Google Scholar
  44. Sproull, L, and Kiesler, S (1991) Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Suchman, L (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: the Problem of Human-machine Communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Wellman, B (1992) Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support? Advances in Group Processes, 9, 207–235.Google Scholar
  47. Wellman, B (1997) An electronic group is virtually a social network, inCulture of the Internet(ed. S Kiesler), Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 179–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenny Preece

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations