Cyberspace as Representation of Space Experience: In Defence of a Phenomenological Approach

  • Lars Qvortrup

Abstract

This article is about cyberspace as a name for virtual spaces created by virtual reality techniques (virtual reality hardware and software). Thus it is about a special 3D interface concept, not about the Internet as a metaphorical communication space. The message of the article can be condensed into three points:
  • Cyberspace should be understood neither as something constituting a parallel world (referring to a dualistic paradigm), nor as a representation of the real world (referring to a positivistic paradigm), but should be conceptualized as a representation of the space experience of human beings (referring to a phenomenological paradigm).

  • The basic aspects of virtual reality techniques – passive stereo, active stereo and interaction devices – are representations of fundamental space experience attributes and not of attributes of space as such. They represent the way in which weperceivespace (by observing space with our two eyes and ears); the way in which wearein space (by moving our body in space); and the way in which wepracticespace (by interacting with objects in space).

  • Three functional types of cyberspace applications can be identified: the reference function, the support function and the parallel world function. These three functional aspects can be systematized within the scheme of cyberspace semiotics: the iconic cyberspace functionality; the indexical cyberspace functionality; and the symbolic cyberspace functionality.

Keywords

Manifold Logical Positivism Paral Defend Photography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberti, L. B. (1972) (1435 andca.1466) OnPainting and on Sculpture(ed. C. Grayson). London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  2. Berkeley, G. (1938) (1710) Principles of human knowledge. InA New Theory of Vision and Other Writings.London: Dent.Google Scholar
  3. Gingerich, O. (1993)The Eye of Heaven. Ptolemy Copernicus Kepler. New York: The American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  4. Heidegger, M. (1950)Holzwege.Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. (1986)Sein und Zeit.Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  6. Heim, M. (1993)The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Heim, M. (1998)Virtual Realism.New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (1973)Ding und Raum.Husserliana XVI, Den Haag.Google Scholar
  9. Ibn al-Haytham (1989) (1083)The Optics of Ibn al-Haytham(translated with Introduction and Commentary by A. I. Sabra). London: The Warburg Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Jammer, M. (1954)Concepts of Space.Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, S. (1997)Interface Culture.San Franscisco, CA: HarperEdge.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, S. G. (1997)Cybersociety 2.0.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Luhmann, N. (1995)Social Systems.Stanford CA: Stanford University Press (translation ofSoziale Systeme.Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt a. M. 1984).Google Scholar
  14. Luhmann, N. (1997)Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft.Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945)Phénoménologie de la perception.Paris: Editions Gallimard. (The first part, “Lecorps”, has been translated into Danish (1994) Kroppens fcenomenologi. Det line Forlag, Frederiksberg).Google Scholar
  16. Meyrowitz, J. (1985)No Sense of Place. The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. NewYork and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Michelsen, A. and Stjernfelt, F. (eds) (2000)Rum og Fcenomenologi.Viborg: Forlaget Spring.Google Scholar
  18. Peirce, C. S. (1955)Philosophical Writings of Peirce.(Selected and edited, with an introduction by Justus Buchler). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Price, H. H. (1954)Perception.London.Google Scholar
  20. Qvortrup, L.The Hypercomplex Society.New York: Peter Lang (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  21. Searle, J. R. (1995)The Construction of Social Reality.USA, Great Britain: Allen Lane, the Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Vince, J. (1998)Essential Virtual Reality.London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zahavi, D. (1997)Husserls fcenomenologi.Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  24. Zhai, R. (1998)Get Real. A Philosophical Adventure in Virtual Reality.Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Qvortrup

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations