Advertisement

Designs for Networked Learning in Higher Education: A Phenomenographic Investigation of Practitioners’ Accounts of Design

  • Chris Jones
  • Mireia Asensio
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)

Abstract

Academics in higher education are coming under increasing pressure, which includes pressure to adapt their teaching practices to accommodate networked learning technologies. In order to incorporate networked learning into teaching and learning in higher education, there has been a search for what may be described as ‘good’ practice. There has also been discussion of what has been called a new paradigm, a convergence between different modes of teaching and learning enabled by networked technologies. In the search for ‘good’ pedagogic practice in networked learning there is a need to examine in depth the current practices of educators designing networked learning activities, courses or programs. In particular we need to understand the design process itself and the assumptions about the nature of learning and the learning process that are often implicit in design decisions.

Keywords

Instructional Design Online Learning Environment Cognitive Apprenticeship Reflective Practitioner Common Sense View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boot. R.L. & Hodgson. V.E. (1987) OpenLearning: Meaningand Experience. In Hodgson, V.E., Mann, S. & Snell, R. (Eds.) Beyond Distance Teaching Towards Open Learning. Buckingham: SRHF/Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Boot, R. & Reynolds, M. (1984) Rethinking Experience Based Events. In Cox, C. & Beck, J. (Eds.) Management Developments: Advances in Practice and Theory. Chichester: John Wileyand SonsGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989) Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1) pp32–42Google Scholar
  4. Brown. J.S. & Duguid. P. (1996) Stolen Knowledge. In Mclellan, H. (Ed) Situated Learning Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs,N.J.: Educational Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers, J. & Martin, D. (1999) Informing Collaborative Information Visualization Through an Ethnography of Ambulance Control. In Bodker, S., Kyng, M. & Schmidt, K. ECSCW’ 99: The Proceedings of the Sixth. European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  6. ]Burgoyne, J. & Reynolds, M. (Eds) (1997) Management Learning. Integrating Perspectives in Theory and Practice. London: Sage publicationsGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley, M. (1999) Human-Centered Design. In Jacobson, R. (Ed.) Information Design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp59–83Google Scholar
  8. Dills, C.R. & Romiszowski, A.J. (1997) Instructional Development Paradigms. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  9. Eastmond, D. & Ziegahn, L. (1995) Instructional Design for the Online Classroom. In Berge, Z. & Collins, M. (Eds) Computer Mediated Communication and the Online Classroom (Vol. 3: Distance Learning) pp59–80. New Jersey: Hampton PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, D. & Mercer, N. (1987) Common Knowledge: The Development Of Understanding In the Classroom. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Enwistle, N., Entwistle, A. & Tait, H. (1993) Academic Understanding and Contexts to Enhance It: A Perspective from Research on Student Learning. In Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J. & Jonassen, D.H. (Eds) (1993) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Berlin: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleming, W.G. (1986) The Interview: A Neglected Issue in Research on Student Learning. Higher Education IS, pp547–563Google Scholar
  13. Harasim, L. (1989) Online Education: A New Domain. In Mason, R. & Kaye, A.R. (Eds) Mindweave: Communication, Computer and Distance Education. Oxford: PergamonGoogle Scholar
  14. Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L. & Turoff, M. (1995) Learning Networks: A Field Guide to Teaching and Learning Online. Cambridge, MA. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Hiltz, S.R. & Benbunan-Fich, R. (1997) Supporting Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Learning Networks. In UNESCO/OPEN UNIVERSITY International Colloquium: Virtual Learning Environments and the Role of the Teacher. Milton Keynes: Open University. http://www.eies.njit.edu Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, J., Randall, D. & Shapiro, D. (1992) Faltering from Ethnography to Design. In Proceedings ofthe ACM 1992 Conference on CSCW. New York: ACM PressGoogle Scholar
  17. ]Koschmann, T. (Ed) (1996) CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  18. Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Teaching: A Frameworkfor the Effective Use of Educational Technology. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawson, B. (1980) How Designers Think. London: The Architectural Press LtdGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin et al (1995) Instructional Design and Development of Learning Communities: An invitation to Dialog, Educational Technology Sep-Oct 1995, p53Google Scholar
  22. Marton, F. (1994) Phenomenography. In Husen, T. & Postlethwaite, T.N. The International Encyclopaedia ofEducation (2nd edition). Oxford: Pergamon, pp4424–4429Google Scholar
  23. Marton, F. & Booth, S. (1997) Learning and Awareness. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  24. Mason, R.D. (1989) A Case Study of the Use of Computer Conferencing at the Open University. PhD, Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. Mason, R. & Kaye, A. (1990) Towards a New Paradigm for Distance Education. In Harasim, L. (Ed) Online Education: Perspectives on a New Environment. New York: PraegerGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, R. (1994) Using Communications Media in Open and Flexible Learning. London; Kogan PageGoogle Scholar
  27. Paulsen, M.F. (1995) The Online Report on Pedagogical Techniques for ComputerMediated Communication. http://www.home.nettskolen.nki.no/-mortenl
  28. Plowman, L., Rogers, Y. & Ramage, M. (1995) What Are Workplace Studies for? In ECSCW’ 95: The Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Co-operative Work. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  29. Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University PressGoogle Scholar
  30. Randall, D., Hughes, lA. & Shapiro, D. (1994) Using Ethnography to Inform System Design. Journal of Intelligent Systems 4, (1–2), pp9–28Google Scholar
  31. Reynolds, M. (1997). Learning Styles: A Critique. Management Learning. 28, (6) pp115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richardson, J.E.T. (1999) The Concepts and Methods of Phenomenographic Research. Review of Educational Research 69, (1) pp53–82Google Scholar
  33. ]Reigeluth, C. (Ed) (1999) Instructional-Design Theories and Models Volume II. A New Paradigm ofInstructional Design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  34. ]Rogoff, B. (Ed) (1990) Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  35. Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Toohey, S (1999) Designing Courses for Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open UniversityGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Driel, J.H., Verloop, N., Van Werven, H.I. & Dekkers, H. (1997) Teachers’ Craft Knowledge and Curriculum Innovation in Higher Engineering Education. Higher Education, 34, pp105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson, B.T. (1997) Reflections on Constructivism and Instructional Design. In Dills, C.R. & Romiszowski, A.J. (1997) Instructional Development Paradigms. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  40. Whiteley, N (1993) Design for Society. London: Reaktion BooksGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodman, D. & Redley, M. (1996) The wretched document: an analysis of the talk and perceptions of staff on the process and procedure of validation and review, course planning and teaching preparation. In Gibbs, G. (Ed) Improving Student Learning: Using Research to Improve Student Learning. Oxford: Oxford Center For Staff DevelopmentGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Jones
  • Mireia Asensio

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations