Remembrance of Designs Past: Legacy Data, Organisational Memory and Distributed Design

  • Dave Randall
  • Tom Rodden
  • Mark Rouncefield
  • Ian Sommerville


This chapter reports on an ethnographic study of a manufacturing design team in order to understand some features of how distributed, legacy product data is managed and accessed in everyday work. It describes the routine activity of design work and documents how issues of “legacy” and “organisational memory” are instantiated in routine work. The general motivation for the study derived from an interest in understanding the impact of legacy systems and legacy data as organisations confront a number of major and connected transformations in the social, economic and technological environment in which they operate. While there are various diagnoses and explanations of these transformations (Lash and Urry, 1987; Hammer and Champy, 1993); most stress the role of IT in responding to manifest organisational needs. These include a greater reliance on knowledge creation and conversion, the growing importance of the consumer, the growth of distributed organisational structures, and the creation of more flexible patterns of organisational relationships. IT may be viewed as the crucial element in facilitating these changes, through the development of systems that can facilitate coordination and communication, and support skill and knowledge (Zuboff, 1988; Scott-Morton, 1991). Paradoxically, and at the same time IT is also commonly regarded as holding back organisational change as legacy problems, problems of integrating, evolving or replacing ageing systems, proliferate.


Design Team Organisational Memory Virtual Enterprise Everyday Work View Versus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerman, M. (1994). Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organisational and Group Memories. Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh IEEE Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences (HICSS 94): 191–200.Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann, M. and Halverson, C. (1998) Considering an Organisation’s Memory. In Proceedings of CSCW′98, Seattle, Washington 1998. New York. ACM Press, pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. and Sharrock, W. (1993) Can Organisations Afford Knowledge?, CSCW, 1;3, London, KluwerGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannon, L and Kuuti, K (1996) Shifting perspectives on organisational memory: From storage to active remembering. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICS-29) IEEE Computer Press, Los Alamitos, pp. 156–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown (1998) Working Notes: How organisations use technology to collaborate. PhD thesis, Department of sociology. 1998, Guildford, England: University of Surrey. Available on the internet at
  6. Brown, S. (2000) Groupware and the Mediation of Memory. Paper given at the Network, Scale, Memory and Play: Key concepts in ICT research Workshop. Manchester.-available at
  7. Buttny, R (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London. Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Casey, C. (1995) Work, Self and Society After Industrialism. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Coulter, J. (1979) The Social Construction of Mind. London, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulter, J. (1983) Rethinking Cognitive Theory. London, MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards< D and Potter, J (1992) Discursive Psychology. London. Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, H. (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology, Englewoord Cliffs, Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammer, M., and Champy, J. (1993) Re-engineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brierley Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Hughes, J. A., King, V., Rodden, T., and Andersen, H. (1994) “Moving out from the control room: Ethnography in system design”. In Proceedings of CSCW ′94, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, J.A., O’Brien, J., Randall, D., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M. and Tolmie P. (1999) Getting to Know the “Customer in the Machine”. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work Nov 14-17 Phoenix, Arizona. New York. ACM Press, pp. 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, J.A., Kristoffersen, S., O’Brien, J., and Rouncefield, M. (1996) “When Mavis met IRIS” Ending the Love Affair with Organisational Memory. In Proceedings of the 19th Information systemsResearch seminar In Scandinavia, Lokeberg, Sweden 10-13 August 1996. Gothenburg, Gothenburg Studies in Informatics, Report 8, June 1996, Vol 2, pp. 767–787.Google Scholar
  17. Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987) The End of Organised Capitalism. Madison, Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  19. Middleton, D. and Edwards, D. (1990) Collective Remembering. London. Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Orlikowski, M. (1997) Evolving With Notes: Organisational Change around Groupware Technology, in Groupware and Teamwork: Invisible Aid or Technical Hindrance?, C. Ciborra, Editor. 1997, Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Randall, D., Hughes, J. A., O’Brien, J., and Rouncefield, M. (1996) “Organisational Memory and CSCW: Supporting the “Mavis Phenomenon”.” In Proceedings of OzCHI 96, Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  22. Randall, D., Hughes, J., O’Brien, J., Rouncefield M. and Tolmie P. (2000) “Memories Are Made Of This”: Explicating Organisational Memory.— in Edwards, J and Kidd, J. (eds) proceedings of KMAC2000 The Knowledge Management Conference, Aston, Birmingham. Operational Research Society. pp255–264.Google Scholar
  23. Randall, D., Rouncefield, M, and Hughes J. (1995) “Chalk and Cheese: BPR and ethnomethodologically informed ethnography in CSCW.” in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW ′95. Dordrecht. Kluwer, pp. 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt, K and Bannon, L. (1992)Google Scholar
  25. Scott Morton, M. ed. (1991), The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sieber, P and Griese, J. (1998) (eds) Organizational Virtualness in Proceedings of the VoNet—Workshop, 27-28 April, 1998. Available from
  27. Strathern M. (ed.), (2000) Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human—machine communication. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Walsh, J.P., and Ungson, G. R. (1991) Organizational Memory. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1) 57–91.Google Scholar
  30. Winter, S.G., (1999), Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets, in M. Zack (1999) Knowledge and Strategy. Boston, Ma., Butterworth/HeinmannGoogle Scholar
  31. Yates, J. (1989) Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Baltimore. John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Zimmerman, F-O. (1997) “Structural and managerial aspects of virtual enterprises” from Proceedings of the European Conference on Virtual Enterprises and Networked Solutions— New Perspectives on Management, Communication and Information Technology, 7-10 April 1997, Paderborn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  33. Zuboff, S. (1988) In the age of the smart machine. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dave Randall
  • Tom Rodden
  • Mark Rouncefield
  • Ian Sommerville

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations