WebShell: The development of web based expert systems
It is rare to find knowledge based appearing on the World Wide Web. This is, in part, due to difficulties associated with porting expert system shell environments to the world wide web. For instance, many real world applications require shell environments that do more than make mere inferences with rules. However, integrating rule based reasoning with other approaches exacerbate the difficulties in placing hybrid, ystems on the World Wide Web. In this paper, we present a knowledge based system shell, WebShell that enables knowledge based systems to be developed and executed on the World Wide Web. WebShell models knowledge using two distinct techniques; decision trees for procedural type tasks and argument trees for tasks that are more complex, ambiguous or uncertain. Rather than translate decision tree knowledge into rules, we map the decision trees into sets we call sequenced transition networks. These sets can readily be stored in a relational database format in a way that simplifies the inference engine design. The inference engines for both the argument tree and the decision tree models execute on the server side and have been implemented using a very small (30K) PHP program.
KeywordsSmit Dick Berman
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Clark, P. 1991. A Model of Argumentation and Its Application in a Cooperative Expert System. PhD thesis. Turing Institute. Department of Computer Science. University of Strathclyde. Glasgow.Google Scholar
- 3.Dick, J. P. 1991. A conceptual, case-relation representation of text for intelligent retrieval. Ph.D Thesis. University of Toronto. 1991. Canada.Google Scholar
- 4.Dick, J. P. 1987. Conceptual retrieval and case law. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. Boston. May 27–29. ACM Press. p106–115.Google Scholar
- 5.Fox, J., and Parsons, S., 1998. Arguing about Beliefs and Actions. In Hunter, A., and Parsons, S., (Eds). 1998. Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms. Springer. Berlin. Pp 266–302.Google Scholar
- 6.Grove, R, F., and Hulse, A, C., 1999. An Internet based expert system for reptile identification. PAJava99. Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Practical Application of Jaye. Practical Application Company Ltd. pp 165–73.Google Scholar
- 7.Huntington, D. 2000. Web-based expert system are on the way: Java bsed Web delivery. PCAI Intelligent Solutions for Desktop Computers vol 14, no 6. Nov-Dec, pp34–36Google Scholar
- 8.Koers, A. W., Kracht, D., Smith, M., Smits, J. M. and Weusten, M. C. M. 1989. Knowledge Based Systems in Law. Computer/Law Series. Kluwer. The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- 10.Marshall, C. C, 1989. Representing the structure of legal argument. Proceedings of Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM Press,USA. pp121–127Google Scholar
- 11.Shortliffe, E. H. 1976. Computer based medical consultations: MYCIN. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- 12.Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Yearwood, J., 2002. Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and monoletical reasoning. To appear in Knowledge Engineering ReviewGoogle Scholar
- 13.Toulmin S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.CambridgeGoogle Scholar