Knowledge Technologies: A ReUse Perspective

(Extended Abstract)
  • Derek Sleeman
Conference paper

Abstract

In 2000 the EPSRC funded an Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration (IRC) in Advanced Knowledge Technologies for the period 2000–2006, which involves 5 UK Universities: Aberdeen, Edinburgh, OU, Sheffield & Southampton. The project seeks to provide an intellectual underpinning for much of eCommerce, and at the same time it is contributing to the definition & realization of the Semantic Web. Six grand challenges have been identified, namely: Knowledge Acquisition, Modelling, Use/ReUse, Retrieval, Knowledge Publishing, & Maintenance. Considerable effort is being expended to ensure that the different knowledge sources can inter-operate. Additionally, several industrial test beds should ensure that the group’s earlier & new technologies are integrated; these test beds are in the service & manufacturing sectors, and AKT is also applying these techniques to the Consortium’s own information management. In the talk I plan to review each of the above activities, but will focus on ReUse (a holy grail for KBS Research). I will give an overview of what has been achieved to date, & will discuss several current projects in this sub-area.

Keywords

Hunt Alan 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shortliffe, EH (1976). Computer-based Medical Consultation: MYCIN. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalfoglou, Y, Menzies, T, Althoff, K-D, & Motta, E. (2000). Meta-Knowledge in systems design: Panacea or undelivered promise. Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol 15, 4, pp381 - 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winter, M & Sleeman, D (1995). REFINER+: An Efficient System for Detecting and Removing Inconsistencies in Example Sets. In Research & Development in Expert Systems XII (eds MA Bramer, JL Nealon & R Milne). Oxford: Information Press Ltd. pp 115–132.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alberdi, E & Sleeman, D. (1997). ReTAX: a step in the automation of taxonomic revision. Artificial Intelligence, p 257–279.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winter, M, Sleeman, D & Parsons, T (1997). Inventory Management using Constraint Satisfaction and Knowledge Refinement Techniques. In Proceedings of ES97 (J Hunt & R Miles (eds)) Publ: Oxford: SGES press (ISBN 1 899621 20 2), pp 277–293.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carbonara, L & Sleeman, D. (1999). Effective and Efficient Knowledge Base Refinement. Machine Learning, Vol 37, pp143–181.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Preece, A, Hui, K, Gray, A, Marti, P, Bench-Capon, T, Jones, D & Cui, Z. The KRAFT Architecture for Knowledge Fusion and Transformation, In M Bramer, A Macintosh & F Coenen (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVI (Proc ES99), Springer, pages 23–38, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Puppe, F., (1998), “Knowledge Reuse among Diagnostic Problem-Solving Methods in the Shell-Kit D3”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Academic Press, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gennari, J. H., Cheng, H., Altman, R. B., Musen, M. A., (1998), “Reuse, CORBA, and Knowledge-based Systems”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    White, S & Sleeman, D. (1999). A Constraint-based Approach to the Description of Competence. Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling & Management eds D. Fensel and R. Studer. Publ: Springer, p291–308.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    White, S & Sleeman, D. (to appear). A Grammar-Driven Knowledge Acquisition Tool that incorporates Constraint Propagation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap’0I).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek Sleeman
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing Science DepartmentThe University AberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations