Abstract
Few topics engender more diversity of view and opinion than “quality.” The term is often used with the modifier “high” implied; only an explicit reference to low quality requires a modifier. An assertion such as “that’s a quality automobile” or “quality goes in before the name goes on” needs no clarification that high quality is intended. What is embodied in the term “quality” or how an assessment intends to measure it are issues that evoke major disagreements. Consider the differences in perceptions and reactions to the assertion, “that person is a quality teacher.” The attributes of a teacher that elicit praise by students vary greatly among the evaluators, simply because a match in learning approach and teaching style is the key to a successful experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nance, R.E., Arthur, J.D. (2002). Software Quality: Views and Purviews. In: Managing Software Quality. Practitioner Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0117-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0117-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-393-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0117-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive