Advertisement

What is Your Relationship with Your Information Space?

  • John Vince
  • Rae Earnshaw
Conference paper

Abstract

This invited paper describes a vision for a fundamentally new approach to finding the unexpected and verifying the expected in massive information spaces. Rather than communicate with our information spaces using abstractions, our relationship and interaction with our information spaces are that of a master to its slave. Today, we specify searches and our information resources respond to our specifically worded queries. However, when dealing with massive information spaces, determining how to construct the queries themselves is daunting. Instead, we argue that the information spaces themselves must be given sufficient latitude to support a human-information discourse, by (1) developing its own initiative and thereby supporting a more equal communication style, (2) presenting information within a context that can itself be relied upon as an artifact of communication, (3) while creating a two way dialogue for query and thought refinement. We will motivate the change from human-computer interaction into human-information interaction, discuss higher order interactions with information spaces, and address the technical challenges in achieving this vision.

Keywords

Information Resource Massive Data Digital Medium Information Space High Order Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    £®Card, S.K., T.P. Moran, and Newell, A., “The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction,” ISBN 0–89859–0–89859, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    £®Schneiderman, Ben, “Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human ¡ª Computer Interaction,” ISBN 0–2–0–2–2, Addison Wesley, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    £®Wise, James A., James, J. Thomas, Kelly Pennock, David Lantrip, Marc Pottier, Anne Schur, and Vern Crow: “Visualizing the Nonvisual: Spatial Analysis and Interaction with Information from Text Documents,” Proc. IEEE Information Visualization ‘85, (1995), 51–58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    £®Thomas, James J., Kris Cook, Vern Crow, Beth Hetzler, Richard May, Dennis McQuerry, Renie McVeety, Nancy Miller, Grant Nakamura, Lucy Nowell, Paul Whitney, and Pak Chung Wong: “Human Computer Interaction with Global Information Spaces - Beyond Data Mining.” Digital Media Futures: British Computer Society, International Conference April 13–14, 1999. Published by Springer, Digital Media, ISBN 13–14–13–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    £®Turner, A.E., and L.T. Nowell, “Beyond the Desktop, Diversity and Artistry,” to appear CHI 2000 proceedings Spring 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    £®Hetzler, Beth, Paul Whitney, Lou Martucci, and James J. Thomas: “Multi-faceted Insight Through Interoperable Visual Information Analysis Paradigms.” In Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, InfoVis ‘88, October 19–20, 1998, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, pp.19–20.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    £®Havre S.L., E.G. Hetzler, P.D. Whitney, and L.T. Nowell, 2002 “ThemeRiver: Visualizing Thematic Changes in Large Document Collections” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics Vol 8, No 1, January 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    £®Havre S.L., E.G. Hetzler, K.A. Perrine, E.R. Jurrus, and N.E. Miller: “Interactive Visualization of Multiple Query Results.” In Proc. of Information Visualization 2001. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    £®Thomas J.J., P.J. Cowley, O.A. Kuchar, L.T. Nowell, J.R. Thomson, and P.C. Wong: “Discovering Knowledge Through Visual Analysis,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, Springer, ISSN 0948–695x, International Conference on Knowledge Management, July 0948–695, 2001. PP. 0948–695.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    £®Nowell LT, B.G. Hetzler, and T.E. Tanasse: “Change Blindness in Information Visualization ” IEEE InfoViz Symposium 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    £®Thomas, J.J. and A.E. Turner: “Access and Retrieval of Digital Media,” Digital Media Conference: BCS, April, 10–13, 2000, National Musuem of PhotographyGoogle Scholar
  12. Film, and Television, Bradford England, Published in book form by Springer, Oct. 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    £®de Beaugrande, R.: “New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse: Cognition, Communication, and the Freedom of Access to Knowledge and Society,” Ablex Publishing Corp. (1996).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    £®Novick D. & S. Sutton: “What is mixed-initiative interaction?” Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction. Stanford University: AAAI Press. (1997).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    £®Quine, W. V.“Word & Object,” MIT Press. (1964).Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    £®Eco, U.: “A Theory of Semiotics,” Indiana University Press. (1976).Google Scholar
  17. £®Habermas, J.: “The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society,” Beacon Press. (1984).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    £®Eco, U.: “Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language,” Indiana University Press. (1986).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    £®Habermas, J. and M. Cooke, M. “On the Pragmatics of Communication,” MIT Press. (1998).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    £®Lai, Jennifer, Guest Editor “Conversational Interfaces,” Communications of the ACM, September, 2000.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    £®Oviatt, Sharon: “Taming Recognition Errors with a Multimodal Interface,” Communications of the ACM September, 2000. http://www.sims.berkley.edu/now-much-info Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    £®Vygotsky, L.S. (1962) Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge Books, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    £®Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1969) The Psychology of the Child, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Vince
    • 1
  • Rae Earnshaw
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Media, Arts and CommunicationBournemouth UniversityPoole
  2. 2.Department of Electronic Imaging and Media CommunicationsUniversity of BradfordBradford

Personalised recommendations