Skip to main content

From margins to mainstream

  • Chapter
Inclusive Design

Abstract

Although the academic and broadsheet worlds still tend to refer to ‘the elderly’ and ‘the disabled’, as if they form distinct groups outside the mainstream of society, there is a growing trend to recognise age and disability as something we will all experience, and therefore part of a normal life course. Disabled people have become increasingly assertive about their rights to access buildings and services, while for older people the emphasis is now on independence. Both groups aspire to active participation within the mainstream of society, reject the dependency and institutionalisation that were the norm for much of the last century, and are beginning to assert themselves as consumers who control significant amounts of disposable income. Such new expectations offer a rationale for design that is ‘inclusive’ rather that exclusive, and more closely aligned to contemporary social expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Allied Dunbar National Fitness Survey (1992) Main findings: A report on activity patterns and fitness levels. Sports Council and Health Education Authority, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benktzon M (1993) Designing for our future selves: The Swedish experience.Applied Ergonomics, 24, 1, Butterworth-Heinemann, London: 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicknell J, McQuiston L eds (1977) Design for need: the social contribution of design. Conference proceedings. Pergamon Press & Royal College of Art, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for universal Design. At http://www.designncsu.edu/cud

  • Coleman R (1995) Design strategies for older people. Designing for our future selves, Royal College of Art, London: 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R (1994) The case for inclusive design — an overview. Proceedings of the 12 triennial congress, International Ergonomics Association and Human Factors Association of Canada, Toronto: 3, 250–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R (1997a) Working together: a new approach to design. Royal College of Art, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R ed (1997b) Design für die zukunft. DuMont Buchverlag, Cologne: 140–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R (1999) Introduction to the Methods Lab. PRESENCE: new media for older people, Netherlands Design Institute, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R, Bound J, Aldersey-Williams H eds (1999) The Methods Lab: user research for design. Design forAgeing Network, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PJ, Keats S (2002) Quantifying design exclusion. Universal access in assistive technology, Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DDA (1995) Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Department of Education and Employment, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • DDA (1995) Disability Discrimination Act 1995. Department of Education and Employment, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney R and Associates (2000) A study of the difficulties disabled people have when using everyday consumer products. DTI, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk J (1993) Design for the elderly: a biological perspective. Applied Ergonomics 24,1 Butterworth-Heinman, London: 47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Follette-Story M, Mueller J (2001) Universal design ofproducts. Universal design handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York: 49.11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner L, Powell L, Page M (1993) An appraisal of a selection of products currently available to older consumers. Applied Ergonomics, 24,1. Butterworth-Heinman, London: 35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith S (1963) Designing for the disabled. Royal Institute of British Architects, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith S (2001) The bottom-up methodology ofuniversal design. Universal design handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York: 25,6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2002) Defming design exclusion. Universal access in assistive technology, Springer-Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates S, Clarkson PJ (2002) Countering design exclusion. Universal access in assistive technology, Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelstam M (1997) Was ein Name bewirken kann: Hilfsmittel fůr Behinderte in Grossbritannien. Design für die zukunft, DuMont Buchverlag, Cologne: 47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Manky D ed (1986) New design for old.Victoria andAlbert Museum and Helen Hamlyn Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone N (2000) Fully equipped: the provision of equipment to older or disabled people by the NHS and Social Services in England and Wales. Audit Commission Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moggridge B (1993) Design by story-telling. Applied Ergonomics 24,1 Butterworth-Heinman,London: 15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore P (1985) Disguised.Word Books, Waco, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff E (2001) Universal design practice in the United States. Universal design handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York: 43.5, 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostroff E, Preiser W eds (2001) Universal design handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkl J, Babic A (1988) Guidelines and strategies for designing transgenerational products: an instructors manual Copley Publishing Group, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkl J (1993) Transgenerational Design: products for an aging population. New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirkl J (1991) Transgenerational design: A Design strategy whose time has arrived. Design Management Journal, fall: 55–60 RSA Student Design Awards. At http://www.rsa.org.uk/sda/default.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhu J (1993) Design for the elderly: user-based evaluation studies involving elderly users with special needs. Applied Ergonomics 24,1 Butterworth-Heinman, London: 30–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Sará-Serrano M, Mathiason J (2001) United Nations standards andrules. Universal design handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York: 11.2

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales J, Scase R (2000) Fit and 50: a report prepared for the Economic and Social Research Council ESRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • TIDE User Consortium at http://www.stakes.fi/include

  • Trace Center, University of Madison,Wisconsin at http://www.trace.wisc.edu

  • Trace Center (1999) Universal design research project. At http://www.trace.wisc.edu/docs/univ_design_res_proj/udrp.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (1993) Design and elderly people. RSA Journal, London: May 25

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, R., Lebbon, C., Clarkson, J., Keates, S. (2003). From margins to mainstream. In: Clarkson, J., Keates, S., Coleman, R., Lebbon, C. (eds) Inclusive Design. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0001-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-0001-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics